OBJECTIVE: Deficits in motor inhibition may contribute to impulsivity and irritability in children with bipolar disorder. Studies of the neural circuitry engaged during failed motor inhibition in pediatric bipolar disorder may increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of the illness. The authors tested the hypothesis that children with bipolar disorder and comparison subjects would differ in ventral prefrontal cortex, striatal, and anterior cingulate activation during unsuccessful motor inhibition. They also compared activation in medicated versus unmedicated children with bipolar disorder and in children with bipolar disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) versus those with bipolar disorder without ADHD. METHOD: The authors conducted an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study comparing neural activation in children with bipolar disorder and healthy comparison subjects while they performed a motor inhibition task. The study group included 26 children with bipolar disorder (13 unmedicated and 15 with ADHD) and 17 comparison subjects matched by age, gender, and IQ. RESULTS: On failed inhibitory trials, comparison subjects showed greater bilateral striatal and right ventral prefrontal cortex activation than did patients. These deficits were present in unmedicated patients, but the role of ADHD in mediating them was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: In relation to comparison subjects, children with bipolar disorder may have deficits in their ability to engage striatal structures and the right ventral prefrontal cortex during unsuccessful inhibition. Further research should ascertain the contribution of ADHD to these deficits and the role that such deficits may play in the emotional and behavioral dysregulation characteristic of bipolar disorder.
OBJECTIVE: Deficits in motor inhibition may contribute to impulsivity and irritability in children with bipolar disorder. Studies of the neural circuitry engaged during failed motor inhibition in pediatric bipolar disorder may increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of the illness. The authors tested the hypothesis that children with bipolar disorder and comparison subjects would differ in ventral prefrontal cortex, striatal, and anterior cingulate activation during unsuccessful motor inhibition. They also compared activation in medicated versus unmedicated children with bipolar disorder and in children with bipolar disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) versus those with bipolar disorder without ADHD. METHOD: The authors conducted an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study comparing neural activation in children with bipolar disorder and healthy comparison subjects while they performed a motor inhibition task. The study group included 26 children with bipolar disorder (13 unmedicated and 15 with ADHD) and 17 comparison subjects matched by age, gender, and IQ. RESULTS: On failed inhibitory trials, comparison subjects showed greater bilateral striatal and right ventral prefrontal cortex activation than did patients. These deficits were present in unmedicated patients, but the role of ADHD in mediating them was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: In relation to comparison subjects, children with bipolar disorder may have deficits in their ability to engage striatal structures and the right ventral prefrontal cortex during unsuccessful inhibition. Further research should ascertain the contribution of ADHD to these deficits and the role that such deficits may play in the emotional and behavioral dysregulation characteristic of bipolar disorder.
Authors: Pilyoung Kim; Sarah E Jenkins; Megan E Connolly; Christen M Deveney; Stephen J Fromm; Melissa A Brotman; Eric E Nelson; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2011-10-22 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Ariel Brown; Joseph Biederman; Eve Valera; Alexandra Lomedico; Megan Aleardi; Nikos Makris; Larry J Seidman Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; Cristina Gorrostieta; Hernando Ombao; Lisa D Goldberg; Alison C Brazel; Christopher J Gable; Clare Kelly; Dylan G Gee; Xi-Nian Zuo; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Michael A Cerullo; Caleb M Adler; Martine Lamy; James C Eliassen; David E Fleck; Stephen M Strakowski; Melissa P DelBello Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: A E Doyle; J Wozniak; T E Wilens; A Henin; L J Seidman; C Petty; R Fried; L M Gross; S V Faraone; J Biederman Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2008-12-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Melissa Lopez-Larson; Emily S Michael; Janine E Terry; Janis L Breeze; Steven M Hodge; Lena Tang; David N Kennedy; Constance M Moore; Nikos Makris; Verne S Caviness; Jean A Frazier Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Birgit Abler; Ian Greenhouse; Dost Ongur; Henrik Walter; Stephan Heckers Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; Brendan A Rich; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Lisa Berghorst; Deborah Vinton; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 6.744