Literature DB >> 11113037

Dissociable mechanisms of attentional control within the human prefrontal cortex.

Y Nagahama1, T Okada, Y Katsumi, T Hayashi, H Yamauchi, C Oyanagi, J Konishi, H Fukuyama, H Shibasaki.   

Abstract

Neuropsychological tests that require shifting an attentional set, such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, are sensitive to frontal lobe damage. Although little information is available for humans, an animal experiment suggested that different regions of the prefrontal cortex may contribute to set shifting behavior at different levels of processing. Behavioral studies also suggest that set shifting trials are more time consuming than non-set shifting trials (i.e. switch cost) and that this may be underpinned by differences at the neural level. We determined whether there were differential neural responses associated with two different levels of shifting behavior, that of reversal of stimulus-response associations within a perceptual dimension or that of shifting an attentional set between different perceptual dimensions. Neural activity in the antero-dorsal prefrontal cortex increased only in attentional set shifting, in which switch costs were significant. Activity in the postero-ventral prefrontal cortex increased not only in set shifting but also in reversing stimulus-response associations, in which switch costs were absent. We conclude that these distinct regions in the human prefrontal cortex provide different levels of attention control in response selection. Thus, the antero-dorsal prefrontal cortex may be critical for higher order control of attention, i.e. attentional set shifting, whereas the postero-ventral area may be related to a lower level of shift, i.e. reorganizing stimulus-response associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11113037     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/11.1.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  52 in total

1.  Wisconsin Card Sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  O Monchi; M Petrides; V Petre; K Worsley; A Dagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Defining the neural mechanisms of probabilistic reversal learning using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Luke Clark; Adrian M Owen; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  The prefrontal cortex: insights from functional neuroimaging using cognitive activation tasks.

Authors:  Ingeborg Goethals; Kurt Audenaert; Christophe Van de Wiele; Rudi Dierckx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

5.  Differential responses in human striatum and prefrontal cortex to changes in object and rule relevance.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Luke Clark; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural correlates of switching set as measured in fast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Anna B Smith; Eric Taylor; Mick Brammer; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Selection for cognitive control: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Striatal dopamine influences the default mode network to affect shifting between object features.

Authors:  Linh C Dang; Aneesh Donde; Cindee Madison; James P O'Neil; William J Jagust
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions.

Authors:  Tara A Niendam; Angela R Laird; Kimberly L Ray; Y Monica Dean; David C Glahn; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin card-sorting task and component processes.

Authors:  Bradley R Buchsbaum; Stephanie Greer; Wei-Li Chang; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.