Literature DB >> 22019244

Day-to-day reproducibility of prostate intrafraction motion assessed by multiple kV and MV imaging of implanted markers during treatment.

Theodore F Mutanga1, Hans C J de Boer, Vinayakrishnan Rajan, Maarten L P Dirkx, Luca Incrocci, Ben J M Heijmen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: When one is performing online setup correction for prostate positioning displacements prior to daily dose delivery, intrafraction motion can become a limiting factor to prostate targeting accuracy. The aim of this study was to quantify and characterize prostate intrafraction motion assessed by multiple kilovoltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) imaging of implanted markers during treatment in a large patient group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intrafraction motion in the sagittal plane was studied by retrospective analysis of displacements of implanted gold markers on (nearly) lateral kV and MV images obtained at various time points during the treatment fractions (mean, 27 per patient) in 108 consecutive patients. The effective prostate motion in a fraction was defined as the time-weighted mean displacement.
RESULTS: Prostate displacements in the sagittal plane increased during the fraction (mean, 0.2 ± 0.2 mm/min). Forty percent of patients had a systematic (i.e., appearing in all fractions) effective displacement in the sagittal plane greater than 2 mm. Observed effective population mean-of-means (μeff) +/- systematic (Σeff) intrafraction motion (μ(eff) ± Σ(eff)) was 0.9 ± 1.1 mm and 0.6 ± 1.0 mm for the anterior-posterior and superior inferior directions, respectively. Corresponding random motion (σ(eff)) was 1.2 mm and 1.1 mm. Mean effective prostate motion in the first 5 fractions was predictive for mean effective displacement in the remaining fractions (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: For a large subgroup of patients, the systematic component of intrafraction prostate motion was substantial. Intrafraction motion correction prior to each beam delivery or offline corrections could likely be beneficial for the subgroup of patients with significant motion. The systematic component is well predicted by measurements in the initial fractions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22019244     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Observation of intrafraction prostate displacement through the course of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yasushi Hamamoto; Hiroki Inata; Noritaka Sodeoka; Shigeki Nakayama; Shintaro Tsuruoka; Hideki Takeda; Toshiharu Manabe; Teruhito Mochizuki; Masakichi Umeda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Three-dimensional surface imaging for detection of intra-fraction setup variations during radiotherapy of pelvic tumors.

Authors:  Giuseppina Apicella; Gianfranco Loi; Sara Torrente; Silvia Crespi; Debora Beldì; Marco Brambilla; Marco Krengli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Impact of inter- and intrafraction deviations and residual set-up errors on PTV margins. Different alignment techniques in 3D conformal prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  T Langsenlehner; C Döller; P Winkler; G Gallé; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Automatic prostate tracking and motion assessment in volumetric modulated arc therapy with an electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Juan Diego Azcona; Ruijiang Li; Edward Mok; Steven Hancock; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Real-time prostate motion assessment: image-guidance and the temporal dependence of intra-fraction motion.

Authors:  Avilash K Cramer; Amanu G Haile; Sanja Ognjenovic; Tulsee S Doshi; William Matthew Reilly; Katherine E Rubinstein; Nima Nabavizadeh; Thuan Nguyen; Lu Z Meng; Martin Fuss; James A Tanyi; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2013-09-23

6.  Approach and assessment of automated stereotactic radiotherapy planning for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Guoping Shan; Ming Chen; Binbing Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A treatment planning study comparing IMRT techniques and cyber knife for stereotactic body radiotherapy of low-risk prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Sergiu Scobioala; Christopher Kittel; Khaled Elsayad; Kai Kroeger; Michael Oertel; Laith Samhouri; Uwe Haverkamp; Hans Theodor Eich
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Delivered dose quantification in prostate radiotherapy using online 3D cine imaging and treatment log files on a combined 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system.

Authors:  Charis Kontaxis; Daan M de Muinck Keizer; Linda G W Kerkmeijer; Thomas Willigenburg; Mariska D den Hartogh; Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp; Eline N de Groot-van Breugel; Jochem Hes; Bas W Raaymakers; Jan J W Lagendijk; Hans C J de Boer
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-13

9.  Analysis of intra-fraction prostate motion and derivation of duration-dependent margins for radiotherapy using real-time 4D ultrasound.

Authors:  Eric Pei Ping Pang; Kellie Knight; Qiao Fan; Sheena Xue Fei Tan; Khong Wei Ang; Zubin Master; Wing-Ho Mui; Ronnie Wing-Kin Leung; Marilyn Baird; Jeffrey Kit Loong Tuan
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-28

10.  Determining intrafractional prostate motion using four dimensional ultrasound system.

Authors:  Mariwan Baker; Claus F Behrens
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.