Literature DB >> 22018069

Melanoma surveillance in the United States: overview of methods.

Meg Watson1, Christopher J Johnson, Vivien W Chen, Cheryll C Thomas, Hannah K Weir, Recinda Sherman, Myles Cockburn, Jeannette Jackson-Thompson, Mona Saraiya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States. Melanoma skin cancer is particularly deadly; more than 8000 US residents die from it each year. Although recent reports suggest that melanoma incidence rates have been increasing, these apparent increases could be caused by an increase in reporting and/or screening, and by an actual increase in the occurrence of melanoma.
OBJECTIVE: In this report, we describe methods used in this supplement to assess the current burden of melanoma in the United States using data from two federal cancer surveillance programs: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. We also provide basic descriptive epidemiologic data about melanoma in the United States.
METHODS: Cancer incidence data from population-based cancer registries that participate in the CDC National Program of Cancer Registries and/or the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program covering 78% of the US population for 2004 to 2006 were used.
RESULTS: Over 45 thousand melanomas were diagnosed annually, with a rate of 19 cases per 100,000 persons. LIMITATIONS: Melanoma rates may vary because of differences in reporting, diagnosis, and screening.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, the articles in this supplement constitute the first comprehensive examination of the overall burden of melanoma in the United States based on data from a majority of the US population.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018069     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  21 in total

1.  Social comparison framing in health news and its effect on perceptions of group risk.

Authors:  Cabral A Bigman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-07-05

2.  The influence of dermatologist and primary care physician visits on melanoma outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jeanne M Ferrante; Eduardo C Gonzalez; Ren Chen; Kate J Fisher; Kymia Love-Jackson; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Melanoma survival in the United States, 1992 to 2005.

Authors:  Lori A Pollack; Jun Li; Zahava Berkowitz; Hannah K Weir; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Umed A Ajani; Donatus U Ekwueme; Chunyu Li; Brian P Pollack
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Association between cutaneous melanoma incidence rates among white US residents and county-level estimates of solar ultraviolet exposure.

Authors:  Thomas B Richards; Christopher J Johnson; Zaria Tatalovich; Myles Cockburn; Melody J Eide; Kevin A Henry; Sue-Min Lai; Sai S Cherala; Youjie Huang; Umed A Ajani
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Melanoma in adolescents and young adults (ages 15-39 years): United States, 1999-2006.

Authors:  Hannah K Weir; Loraine D Marrett; Vilma Cokkinides; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Pragna Patel; Eric Tai; Ahmedin Jemal; Jun Li; Julian Kim; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 6.  Analysis of melanoma recurrence following a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Maggie Hodges; Edward Jones; Teresa Jones; Nathan Pearlman; Csaba Gajdos; Nicole Kounalakis; Martin McCarter
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-08-10

7.  Increasing incidence of melanoma among middle-aged adults: an epidemiologic study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  Garrett C Lowe; Alexandra Saavedra; Kurtis B Reed; Ana I Velazquez; Roxana S Dronca; Svetomir N Markovic; Christine M Lohse; Jerry D Brewer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  The potential impact of reducing indoor tanning on melanoma prevention and treatment costs in the United States: An economic analysis.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Yuanhui Zhang; Donatus U Ekwueme; Sun Hee Rim; Meg Watson
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Comparison of Florida skin cancer screening rates with those in different US regions.

Authors:  Cristina A Fernandez; Laura A McClure; William G Leblanc; Tainya C Clarke; Robert S Kirsner; Lora E Fleming; Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Strategies to reduce indoor tanning: current research gaps and future opportunities for prevention.

Authors:  Dawn M Holman; Kathleen A Fox; Jeffrey D Glenn; Gery P Guy; Meg Watson; Katie Baker; Vilma Cokkinides; Mark Gottlieb; DeAnn Lazovich; Frank M Perna; Blake P Sampson; Andrew B Seidenberg; Craig Sinclair; Alan C Geller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.