Literature DB >> 22017611

Physiological relevance of quantifying segmental contraction synchrony.

Lauren Johnson1, Bouchra Lamia, Hyung Kook Kim, Masaki Tanabe, John Gorcsan, David Schwartzman, Sanjeev G Shroff, Michael R Pinsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most current indices of synchrony quantify left ventricular (LV) contraction pattern in terms of a single, global (integrated) measure. We report the development and physiological relevance of a novel method to quantify LV segmental contraction synchrony.
METHODS: LV pressure-volume and echocardiographic data were collected in seven anesthetized, opened-chest dogs under several pacing modes: right atrial (RA) (control), right ventricular (RV) (dyssynchrony), and additional LV pacing at either apex (CRTa) or free wall (CRTf). Cross-correlation-based integrated (CCSI(int) ) and segmental (CCSI(seg) ) measures of synchrony were calculated from speckle-tracking derived radial strain, along with a commonly used index (maximum time delay). LV contractility was quantified using either E(es) (ESPVR slope) or ESPVR(area) (defined in the manuscript).
RESULTS: RV pacing decreased CCSI(int) at LV base (0.95 ± 0.02 [RA] vs 0.64 ± 0.14 [RV]; P < 0.05) and only CRTa improved it (0.93 ± 0.03; P < 0.05 vs RV). The CCSI(seg) analysis identified anteroseptal and septal segments as being responsible for the low CCSI(int) during RV pacing and inferior segment for poor resynchronization with CRTf. Changes in ESPVR(area) , and not in E(es) , indicated depressed LV contractility with RV pacing, an observation consistent with significantly decreased global LV performance (stroke work [SW]: 252 ± 23 [RA] vs 151 ± 24 [RV] mJ; P < 0.05). Only CRTa improved SW and contractility (SW: 240 ± 19 mJ; ESPVR(area) : 545 ± 175 mmHg•mL; both P < 0.01 vs RV). Only changes in CCSI(seg) and global LV contractility were strongly correlated (R(2) = 0.698, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: CCSI(seg) provided insights into the changes in LV integrated contraction pattern and a better link to global LV contractility changes. ©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22017611      PMCID: PMC3770141          DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03246.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  34 in total

1.  Tissue Doppler imaging is superior to strain rate imaging and postsystolic shortening on the prediction of reverse remodeling in both ischemic and nonischemic heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung; Qing Zhang; Chi-Kin Chan; Yat-Sun Chan; Hong Lin; Leo C C Kum; Shun-Ling Kong; Yan Zhang; John E Sanderson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Michael R Bristow; Leslie A Saxon; John Boehmer; Steven Krueger; David A Kass; Teresa De Marco; Peter Carson; Lorenzo DiCarlo; David DeMets; Bill G White; Dale W DeVries; Arthur M Feldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Quantification of radial mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy without conduction delay by tissue displacement imaging.

Authors:  L Elif Sade; Hideaki Kanzaki; Donald Severyn; Kaoru Dohi; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Echocardiography, dyssynchrony, and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; John E Sanderson; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Predictors of systolic augmentation from left ventricular preexcitation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay.

Authors:  G S Nelson; C W Curry; B T Wyman; A Kramer; J Declerck; M Talbot; M R Douglas; R D Berger; E R McVeigh; D A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony.

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Pitzalis; Massimo Iacoviello; Roberta Romito; Francesco Massari; Brian Rizzon; Giovanni Luzzi; Pietro Guida; Andrea Andriani; Filippo Mastropasqua; Paolo Rizzon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Tissue Doppler imaging predicts improved systolic performance and reversed left ventricular remodeling during long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Peter Søgaard; Henrik Egeblad; W Yong Kim; Henrik K Jensen; Anders K Pedersen; Bent Ø Kristensen; Peter T Mortensen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Relationship between QRS duration and left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  Gabe B Bleeker; Martin J Schalij; Sander G Molhoek; Harriette F Verwey; Eduard R Holman; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Ernst E Van Der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-05

9.  Improvement of left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy is predicted by tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography.

Authors:  Martin Penicka; Jozef Bartunek; Bernard De Bruyne; Marc Vanderheyden; Marc Goethals; Marc De Zutter; Pedro Brugada; Peter Geelen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; Wing-Hong Fung; Hong Lin; Qing Zhang; John E Sanderson; Chu-Pak Lau
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Measures of dyssynchrony in the left ventricle of healthy children and young patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Vincent C Thomas; Kristopher M Cumbermack; Carey K Lamphier; Christina R Phillips; Derek A Fyfe; Brandon K Fornwalt
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  Dynamic right and left ventricular interactions in the pig.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.