Literature DB >> 10851207

Predictors of systolic augmentation from left ventricular preexcitation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay.

G S Nelson1, C W Curry, B T Wyman, A Kramer, J Declerck, M Talbot, M R Douglas, R D Berger, E R McVeigh, D A Kass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: VDD pacing can enhance systolic function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and discoordinate contraction; however, identification of patients likely to benefit is unclear. We tested predictors of systolic responsiveness on the basis of global parameters as well as directly assessed mechanical dyssynchrony. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-two DCM patients with conduction delay were studied by cardiac catheterization with a dual-sensor micromanometer to measure LV and aortic pressures during sinus rhythm and LV free-wall pacing. Pacing enhanced isovolumetric (dP/dt(max)) and ejection-phase (pulse pressure, PP) systolic function by 35+/-21% and 16.4+/-11%, respectively, and these changes correlated directly (r=0.7, P=0.001). %DeltadP/dt(max) was weakly predicted by baseline QRS (r=0.6, P<0.02), more strongly by baseline dP/dt(max) (r=0.7, P=0.001), and best by bidiscriminate analysis combining baseline dP/dt(max) < or =700 mm Hg/s and QRS > or =155 ms to predict %DeltadP/dt(max) > or =25% and %DeltaPP > or =10% (P<0.0005, chi(2)), with no false-positives. Benefit could not be predicted by %DeltaQRS. To test whether basal mechanical dyssynchrony predicted responsiveness to LV pacing, circumferential strains were determined at approximately 80 sites throughout the LV by tagged MRI in 8 DCM patients and 7 additional control subjects. Strain variance at time of maximal shortening indexed dyssynchrony, averaging 28.0+/-7.1% in normal subjects versus 201.4+/-84.3% in DCM patients (P=0.001). Mechanical dyssynchrony also correlated directly with %DeltadP/dt(max) (r=0.85, P=0.008). Conclusions-These results show that although mechanical dyssynchrony is a key predictor for pacing efficacy in DCM patients with conduction delay, combining information about QRS and basal dP/dt(max) provides an excellent tool to identify maximal responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10851207     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.23.2703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  60 in total

1.  Three dimensional echocardiography documents haemodynamic improvement by biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure.

Authors:  W Y Kim; P Søgaard; P T Mortensen; H K Jensen; A K Pedersen; B O Kristensen ; H Egeblad
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Electric currents applied during the refractory period can modulate cardiac contractility in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  D Burkhoff; I Shemer; B Felzen; J Shimizu; Y Mika; M Dickstein; D Prutchi; N Darvish; S A Ben-Haim
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Global improvement in left ventricular performance observed with cardiac contractility modulation is the result of changes in regional contractility.

Authors:  D J Callans; S Fuchs; Y Mika; I Shemer; R Aviv; W Haddad; N Darvish; S A Ben-Haim; R Kornowski
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Intra-left ventricular systolic asynchrony in patients with overt hyperthyroidism.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Kırış; Cihangir Erem; Gülhanım Kırış; Mustafa Koçak; Omer Gedikli; Irfan Nuhoğlu; Merih Kutlu; Tuba Kaplan; Mustafa Gökçe; Sükrü Celik
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Biventricular pacing for heart failure.

Authors:  Rebecca E Lane; Jamil Mayet; Nicholas S Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-03

6.  Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  P D Lambiase; A Rinaldi; J Hauck; M Mobb; D Elliott; S Mohammad; J S Gill; C A Bucknall
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Non-contact mapping of the left ventricle and new insights into the mechanisms for success of biventricular pacing.

Authors:  R J Schilling
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Noninvasive assessment of the biventricular pacing system.

Authors:  Jonathan S Steinberg; Parimal B Maniar; Steven L Higgins; Sherie L Whiting; David B Meyer; Sergio Dubner; Abrar H Shah; David T Huang; Leslie A Saxon
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Silke Isabelle Trautmann; Michael Kloss; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Ventricular reverse remodeling and 6-month outcomes in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis of the MIRACLE study.

Authors:  Gregory W Woo; Susan Petersen-Stejskal; James W Johnson; Jamie B Conti; Juan A Aranda; Anne B Curtis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.