Literature DB >> 15197148

Tissue Doppler imaging is superior to strain rate imaging and postsystolic shortening on the prediction of reverse remodeling in both ischemic and nonischemic heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Cheuk-Man Yu1, Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung, Qing Zhang, Chi-Kin Chan, Yat-Sun Chan, Hong Lin, Leo C C Kum, Shun-Ling Kong, Yan Zhang, John E Sanderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of noninvasive techniques have been used to predict the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients, in particular left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling. This study compared the relative predictive values of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and strain-rate imaging (SRI) parameters for LV reverse remodeling in patients who received CRT and examined for potential differences in ischemic (n=22) and nonischemic (n=32) heart failure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: TDI and SRI were performed at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Eighteen parameters of intraventricular and interventricular asynchrony based on the time to peak myocardial contraction (Ts) and time to peak strain rate (Tsr) were compared, along with postsystolic shortening (PSS). Reverse remodeling with reduction of LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and gain in ejection fraction (all P<0.001) was observed in the whole study population. The standard deviation of Ts of 12 LV segments (Ts-SD) is the most powerful predictor of reverse remodeling in both the ischemic (r=-0.65, P<0.001) and nonischemic (r=-0.79, P<0.001) groups. The PSS of 12 LV segments was a good predictor only for the nonischemic (r=-0.64, P<0.001) but not the ischemic (r=0.32, P=NS) group. However, parameters of SRI and interventricular asynchrony failed to predict reverse remodeling. By multiple regression analysis, independent parameters included Ts-SD in both groups (P<0.005) and PSS of 12 LV segments in the nonischemic group (P=0.03). The area of the receiver operating characteristic curve was largest for Ts-SD (0.94; CI=0.88 to 1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: Ts-SD is the most powerful predictor of LV reverse remodeling and was consistently useful for ischemic and nonischemic heart failure. However, PSS is useful only for nonischemic pathogenesis, whereas the role of SRI parameters was not supported by the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197148     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133276.45198.A5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  111 in total

1.  Intra-left ventricular systolic asynchrony in patients with overt hyperthyroidism.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Kırış; Cihangir Erem; Gülhanım Kırış; Mustafa Koçak; Omer Gedikli; Irfan Nuhoğlu; Merih Kutlu; Tuba Kaplan; Mustafa Gökçe; Sükrü Celik
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David Birnie; Rob A de Kemp; Anthony S Tang; Terence D Ruddy; Michael H Gollob; Ann Guo; Kathryn Williams; Kerry Thomson; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Can cardiac resynchronization therapy cause harm?

Authors:  John E Sanderson; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Echocardiography, dyssynchrony, and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Cheuk-Man Yu; John E Sanderson; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Effects of the aging process on left ventricular systolic and diastolic synchronicity indexes: insights from 160 "completely" healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Hyung-Kwan Kim; Dae-Won Sohn; Sung-A Chang; Keun-Ho Park; Jin-Shik Park; Yong-Jin Kim; Byung-Hee Oh; Young-Bae Park
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  Nuclear Image-Guided Approaches for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT).

Authors:  Weihua Zhou; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Mechanical Dyssynchrony: A Risk Factor but not a Target.

Authors:  Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients without left intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Dominique Auger; Gabe B Bleeker; Matteo Bertini; See H Ewe; Rutger J van Bommel; Tomasz G Witkowski; Arnold C T Ng; Lieselot van Erven; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

10.  Association of corrected QT dispersion with symptoms improvement in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Hina; Hiroshi Kawamura; Takashi Murakami; Keizo Yamamoto; Hirosuke Yamaji; Masaaki Murakami; Satoshi Hirohata; Hiroko Ogawa; Kohsuke Sakane; Shozo Kusachi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.