| Literature DB >> 22016626 |
Robin J White1, Vitaly L Budarin, James W B Moir, James H Clark.
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) confined within porous starch have been prepared in a simple, green and efficient manner, utilising the nanoporous structure of predominantly mesoporous starch (MS) to act as nanoparticle stabiliser, support and reducing surface. MS/AgNP materials present high surface areas (S(BET) > 150 m(2) g(-1)) and mesopore volumes (V(meso) > 0.45 cm(3) g(-1)). The interaction of the AgNP precursor and forming nanoparticle nuclei with the mesoporous domains of the porous polysaccharide, direct porosity to increasingly narrower and more defined pore size distributions, indicative of a degree of cooperative assembly. Transmission electron microscopy images indicated the presence of spherical AgNP of a size reflective of the porous polysaccharide mesopore diameter (e.g., 5-25 nm), whilst XPS analysis confirmed the metallic Ag(0) state. Materials were prepared at relatively low Ag loadings (<0.18 mmol g(-1)), demonstrating excellent antimicrobial activity in solid and liquid phase testing against Gram negative (E. coli) and positive (S. aureus) model bacteria. The resulting materials are biocompatible and present a useful solid porous carbohydrate-based polymer vehicle to control the AgNP size regime and facilitate transference to a biological environment.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; mesoporous; nanoparticles; nanotechnology; polysaccharide; silver; starch
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22016626 PMCID: PMC3189750 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12095782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A) Photograph; and (B) Representative N2 sorption profile of MS/AgNP material (Ag loading: 0.180 mmol g−1).
Figure 2Representative TEM micrographs of MS/AgNP materials; Ag loading (A) 0.059 mmol g−1; and (B) 0.180 mmol g−1.
N2 sorption data for MS/AgNP materials prepared at increasing Ag loadings.
| Ag Loading/mmol g−1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 170 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.008 | 9.6 | 8.2 | |
| 0.029 | 152 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.007 | 8.8 | 6.7 |
| 0.059 | 161 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.007 | 9.0 | 5.8 |
| 0.180 | 175 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.008 | 7.7 | 5.0 |
BET surface area using N2 adsorption data in the relative pressure range 0.05–0.2;
BJH average pore diameter (PD), pore diameter maximum in mesopore region (PDmax), mesopore (Vmeso) and total pore volume (Vtotal);
Micropore volume from the t-plot method.
[MS = control experiment performed in the absence of AgNO3].
Figure 3(A) Pore size distributions of MS and MS/AgNP materials prepared at increasing Ag loading; and (B) Relationship between pore diameter maximum in mesopore region and Ag loading.
Figure 4(A) XPS survey scan of MS/AgNP material; and (B) High resolution XPS spectra of the Ag 3 (d) photoelectron envelope (loading: 0.180 mmol g−1).
Figure 5DRUVs analysis of MS/AgNP materials prepared at increasing Ag loading (surface plasmon maxima (λ) indicated).
Figure 6Bacterial growth curves in Lysogeny broth (LB) growth media, for (A) E. coli; and (B) S. aureus using MS/AgNP prepared at increasing Ag loading. Bacterial growth was monitored measuring the O.D..
Figure 7Representative photographs of agar growth plates for (A) S. aureus + MS control experiment; (B) S. aureus + MS/AgNP (0.180 mmol g−1); and (C) E. coli + MS/AgNP (0.180 mmol g−1) (Scale = 50 mm).