| Literature DB >> 28809249 |
Manuel Ojeda1, Vitaliy Budarin2,3, Peter S Shuttleworth4,5,6, James H Clark7, Antonio Pineda8, Alina M Balu9,10, Antonio A Romero11, Rafael Luque12.
Abstract
Metal-containing mesoporous starches have been synthesized using a simple and efficient microwave-assisted methodology followed by metal impregnation in the porous gel network. Final materials exhibited surface areas >60 m² g-1, being essentially mesoporous with pore sizes in the 10-15 nm range with some developed inter-particular mesoporosity. These materials characterized by several techniques including XRD, SEM, TG/DTA and DRIFTs may find promising catalytic applications due to the presence of (hydr)oxides in their composition.Entities:
Keywords: Co; Cu; Fe; mesoporous polysaccharides; starch
Year: 2013 PMID: 28809249 PMCID: PMC5452507 DOI: 10.3390/ma6051891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Overview of the research objective; transformation of non-porous native polysaccharide into useful porous carbonaceous materials. Adapted from [1].
Figure 2XRD diffraction patterns of (A) CoST; (B) FeST and (C) CuST. The bottom solid lines correspond to the metallic phases with respective JCPDS cards matching the diffraction lines found in the different materials.
Figure 3TG, DTG and DTA curves of Cu-ST under oxidizing (Air, A) and inert atmosphere (Ar, B).
Textural properties of the synthesized materials.
| Materials | SBET a (m2/g) | DBJH b (nm) | VBJH c (mL/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoST | 87 | 14.3 | 0.32 |
| CuST | 76 | 13.7 | 0.31 |
| FeST | 66 | 11.2 | 0.30 |
| Co-STB-uncontrolled calcination | <5 | – | – |
| Co-STB-controlled calcination | 112 | 13.6 | 0.35 |
a BET surface area; b mean pore size diameter and c pore volume as worked out from the Barret Joyner Halenda equation [19].
Figure 4N2 physisorption experiments corresponding to materials: (A) CoST; (B) FeST and (C) CuST.
Figure 5SEM micrographs of: (A) parent native starch and (B) Fe-STB.
Actual metal content in mesoporous starches as compared to the theoretical content obtained by ICP–MS and SEM–EDX.
| Materials | Theoretical metal content (%) | ICP–MS metal content (%) | SEM–EDX metal content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fe-ST | 5 | 4.8 | 2.9 |
| Co-ST | 1.9 | 0.18 | – |
| Cu-ST | 3.9 | 0.2 | – |
Figure 6DRIFTs spectra of: (a) FeST; (b) CuST and (c) CoST.
Figure 7DRIFTs comparison between CuST and Cu-STB. Significant differences in functional groups were observed for both materials.
Figure 8Preparation of metal-containing porous polysaccharides.
Figure 9Pictorial representation of final materials, from left to right: Fe-starch (FeST), Co-starch (CoST) and Cu-starch (CuST).