Literature DB >> 22014530

Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography.

M Dahmani-Causse1, M Marx, O Deguine, B Fraysse, B Lepage, B Escudé.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High-resolution CT imaging is essential to diagnosis and follow-up of temporal bone pathology. Morphologically, CT is the reference examination. The requirement of long-term follow-up thus exposes patients to cumulative radiation doses. Limiting exposure to ionizing radiation is an increasing concern of public health authorities. The principal advantage of Cone Beam CT (CBCT) lies in a significant reduction in radiation dose. The main objective of the present study was to assess the morphologic concordance between CBCT and Multislice Helical Computed Tomography (MSCT) on 20 anatomic landmarks corresponding to regions of interest in clinical practice. The secondary objectives were to compare the two techniques qualitatively in stapes and footplate assessment and measurement of footplate thickness, and quantitatively in terms of dosimetry.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: An experimental anatomical study was performed on 12 temporal bones from fresh human cadavers of unknown clinical history. Each underwent CBCT and MSCT.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in morphologic assessment of the temporal bones on the two techniques. Exploration of the stapes, incudostapedial joint, anterior stapediovestibular joint and footplate was qualitatively more precise on CBCT, and footplate thickness showed less overestimation than on MSCT. CBCT delivered 22 times less radiation than MSCT under the present experimental conditions.
CONCLUSION: CBCT provides reliable morphologic assessment of temporal bone, thanks to higher spatial resolution than on MSCT, with significantly reduced radiation dose. Copyright Â
© 2011. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22014530     DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2011.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis        ISSN: 1879-7296            Impact factor:   2.080


  17 in total

1.  Morphological concordance between CBCT and MDCT: a paranasal sinus-imaging anatomical study.

Authors:  J Demeslay; S Vergez; E Serrano; P Chaynes; P Cantet; B Chaput; G de Bonnecaze
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging.

Authors:  Jens De Cock; Federica Zanca; John Canning; Ruben Pauwels; Robert Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Frank Risi; Bernard Escudé; Irfan Durmo; Christopher James; Frédéric Lauwers; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluation of the human petrotympanic fissure using anatomized cadaveric specimens and multi-detector CT imaging.

Authors:  Óscar Villalba; Santiago Rojas; Marisa Ortega; Alberto Solano; Alfonso Rodríguez-Baeza
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 5.  High-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance findings in cochlear hypoplasias and incomplete partition anomalies: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  Giacomo Talenti; Renzo Manara; Davide Brotto; Felice D'Arco
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos de Miguel; Andrea A Argudo; Silvia A Borkoski Barreiro; Juan Carlos Falcón González; Angel Ramos Macías
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Role of HRCT and MRI of the Temporal Bone in Predicting and Grading the Degree of Difficulty of Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Sanjay Vaid; Neelam Vaid; Manoj Manikoth; Amit Zope
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-05-05

8.  "Is Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) a Potential Imaging Tool in ENT Practice?: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among ENT Surgeons in the State of Odisha, India.

Authors:  S Lata; S K Mohanty; S Vinay; Abhaya Chandra Das; Sanjib Das; Priyadarshini Choudhury
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-05

9.  Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology.

Authors:  Liliane Rosas Gomes; Marcelo Regis Gomes; João Roberto Gonçalves; Antônio Carlos O Ruellas; Larry M Wolford; Beatriz Paniagua; Erika Benavides; Lúcia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2015-10-20

10.  A retrospective, semi-quantitative image quality analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and MSCT in the diagnosis of distal radius fractures.

Authors:  H Lang; J Neubauer; B Fritz; E M Spira; J Strube; M Langer; E Kotter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.