Literature DB >> 22013394

Assessing potential radiological harm to fukushima recovery workers.

Bobby R Scott1.   

Abstract

A radiological emergency exists at the Fukushima Daiichi (Fukushima I) nuclear power plant in Japan as a result of the March 11, 2011 magnitude 9.0 earthquake and the massive tsunami that arrived later. News media misinformation related to the emergency triggered enormous social fear worldwide of the radioactivity that is being released from damaged fuel rods. The heroic recovery workers are a major concern because they are being exposed to mostly gamma radiation during their work shifts and life-threatening damage to the radiosensitive bone marrow could occur over time. This paper presents a way in which the bone marrow equivalent dose (in millisieverts), as estimated per work shift, could be used along with the hazard function model previously developed for radiological risk assessment to repeatedly check for potential life-threatening harm (hematopoietic system damage) to workers. Three categories of radiation hazard indication are proposed: 1, life-threatening damage unlikely; 2, life-threatening damage possible; 3, life-threatening damage likely. Categories 2 and 3 would be avoided if the whole body effective dose did not exceed the annual effective dose limit of 250 mSv. For down-wind populations, hormetic effects (activated natural protective processes) are much more likely than are deleterious effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hormesis; radiological emergency; risk assessment

Year:  2011        PMID: 22013394      PMCID: PMC3186926          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.11-004.Scott

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  9 in total

1.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Calculating hematopoietic-mode-lethality risk avoidance associated with radionuclide decorporation countermeasures related to a radiological terrorism incident.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Systems-related facts and consequences in assessing risk from low-level irradiation.

Authors:  Ludwig Feinendegen; Ronald D Neumann; Myron Pollycove
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Evaluating the risk of death via the hematopoietic syndrome mode for prolonged exposure of nuclear workers to radiation delivered at very low rates.

Authors:  B R Scott; A F Lyzlov; S V Osovets
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Lessons of Chernobyl: SNM members try to decontaminate world threatened by fallout. Part II.

Authors:  L E Ketchum
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Estimation of median human lethal radiation dose computed from data on occupants of reinforced concrete structures in Nagasaki, Japan.

Authors:  S G Levin; R W Young; R L Stohler
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Risk estimators for radiation-induced bone marrow syndrome lethality in humans.

Authors:  B R Scott; F F Hahn; R O McClellan; F A Seiler
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Meta-analysis of non-tumour doses for radiation-induced cancer on the basis of dose-rate.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tanooka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.