OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three-dimensional (3D) measurements of the lower extremity using a biplanar low-dose X-ray device in children and adolescents. METHODS: Firstly, 3D measurements of eight dried bones were analysed by a biplanar low-dose X-ray device (LDX) using stereoscopic software and compared with 3D computed tomography (CT). Secondly, 47 lower limbs of children and adolescents were studied using LDX two-dimensional (2D) and 3D measurements. Both parts were evaluated for femoral and tibial lengths and mechanical angles, frontal and lateral knee angulations, and the femoral neck-shaft angle. RESULTS: The 3D specimen comparison between LDX and CT measurements showed no significant differences: femoral length (P = 0.069), tibial length (P = 0.059), femoral mechanical angle (P = 0.475), tibial mechanical angle (P = 0.067), frontal knee angulation (P = 0.198), lateral knee angulation (P = 0.646) and femoral neck-shaft angle (P = 0.068). The comparison between LDX 2D and 3D measurements showed significant differences in tibial length (P = 0.003), femoral mechanical angle (P < 0.001) and femoral neck-shaft angle (P = 0.001); other parameters were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D LDX system presented reliable measurements compared with 3D CT. Differences between LDX 2D and 3D measurements were noted in the femoral mechanical angle, femoral neck-shaft angle and tibial length. Moderate to good interobserver agreement for the 3D LDX measurements were found. KEY POINTS: Low radiation dose is essential when assessing potential lower extremity discrepancies. A new biplanar low-dose X-ray device can assess such discrepancies in children/adolescents. This LDX device provides equally reliable 3D measurements as prevalent practice LDX measurements carry good overall interobserver agreement.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three-dimensional (3D) measurements of the lower extremity using a biplanar low-dose X-ray device in children and adolescents. METHODS: Firstly, 3D measurements of eight dried bones were analysed by a biplanar low-dose X-ray device (LDX) using stereoscopic software and compared with 3D computed tomography (CT). Secondly, 47 lower limbs of children and adolescents were studied using LDX two-dimensional (2D) and 3D measurements. Both parts were evaluated for femoral and tibial lengths and mechanical angles, frontal and lateral knee angulations, and the femoral neck-shaft angle. RESULTS: The 3D specimen comparison between LDX and CT measurements showed no significant differences: femoral length (P = 0.069), tibial length (P = 0.059), femoral mechanical angle (P = 0.475), tibial mechanical angle (P = 0.067), frontal knee angulation (P = 0.198), lateral knee angulation (P = 0.646) and femoral neck-shaft angle (P = 0.068). The comparison between LDX 2D and 3D measurements showed significant differences in tibial length (P = 0.003), femoral mechanical angle (P < 0.001) and femoral neck-shaft angle (P = 0.001); other parameters were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D LDX system presented reliable measurements compared with 3D CT. Differences between LDX 2D and 3D measurements were noted in the femoral mechanical angle, femoral neck-shaft angle and tibial length. Moderate to good interobserver agreement for the 3D LDX measurements were found. KEY POINTS: Low radiation dose is essential when assessing potential lower extremity discrepancies. A new biplanar low-dose X-ray device can assess such discrepancies in children/adolescents. This LDX device provides equally reliable 3D measurements as prevalent practice LDX measurements carry good overall interobserver agreement.
Authors: Vincent Pomero; David Mitton; Sébastien Laporte; Jacques A de Guise; Wafa Skalli Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Y Chaibi; T Cresson; B Aubert; J Hausselle; P Neyret; O Hauger; J A de Guise; W Skalli Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 1.763
Authors: Günther Maderbacher; Clemens Baier; Achim Benditz; Ferdinand Wagner; Felix Greimel; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Andrea B Rosskopf; Florian M Buck; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Leonhard E Ramseier Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 2.199