| Literature DB >> 22011590 |
Jinah Hwang1, Yun-Hee Chang, Jung Hwa Park, Soo Yeon Kim, Haeyon Chung, Eugene Shim, Hye Jin Hwang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary polyunsaturated fats increase liver injury in response to ethanol feeding. We evaluated the effect of dietary corn oil (CO), olive oil (OO), and beef tallow (BT) on fatty acid composition of liver microsomal membrane and acute acetaminophen hepatotoxicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22011590 PMCID: PMC3214864 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fatty acid composition of corn oil, olive oil and beef tallow
| Fatty Acid | Corn oil | Olive oil | Beef tallow |
|---|---|---|---|
| μmole % | |||
| C14:0 | - | - | 2.3 |
| C16:0 | 8.3 | 10.8 | 29.8 |
| C18:0 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 23.3 |
| C18:1n-9 | 23.5 | 67.8 | 34.2 |
| C18:2n-6 | 59.8 | 9.7 | 2.7 |
| C18:3n-3 | 1.32 | 0.4 | - |
| ΣSFA | 10.8 | 13.7 | 55.4 |
| ΣMUFA | 23.5 | 67.8 | 34.2 |
| ΣPUFA | 61.1 | 10.1 | 2.7 |
Figure 1The effect of acetaminophen on GPT (A), GOT (B), TBARS (C) and hepatic GSH (D) levels. Abbreviations: GA, gum arabic vehicle injected to control group; APAP, acetaminophen injected to case group. Each bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters (a & b) indicate significant difference among APAP groups (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01)
Figure 2Immunoblot analysis for cytochrome P-450 2E1 (CYP 2E1) in hepatic microsomes. Microsomal proteins were analyzed by Western blot with polyclonal antibody against CYP 2E1. All data were normalized to the actin content of the same sample. Each bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 6). *** p < 0.001 compared with gum arbic vehicle and APAP-treated groups by Wilcoson rank sum test.
Fatty acid composition of phospholipids in liver microsomal membrane1
| Fatty Acid | Corn oil | Olive oil | Beef tallow |
|---|---|---|---|
| μmole % | |||
| C14:0 | 0.25 ± 0.10 | 0.42 ± 0.17 | 0.25 ± 0.15 |
| C16:0 | 19.9 ± 0.86 | 21.4 ± 2.39 | 23.8 ± 2.35 |
| C16:1n-7 | 0.25 ± 0.20b* | 1.19 ± 1.36a | 0.95 ± 0.24a |
| C18:0 | 25.6 ± 3.22 | 23.5 ± 2.14 | 23.9 ± 2.63 |
| C18:1n-9 | 3.27 ± 2.30b** | 9.46 ± 3.97a | 6.91 ± 0.51a |
| C18:1n-7 | 1.04 ± 0.54 | 2.67 ± 0.63 | 1.93 ± 0.59 |
| C18:2n-6 | 13.5 ± 1.08a** | 7.12 ± 0.39b | 7.20 ± 0.56b |
| C18:2/C18:12 | 3.13 ± 0.62a*** | 0.63 ± 0.16b | 0.82 ± 0.09b |
| C18:3n-3 | 0.47 ± 0.53 | 0.26 ± 0.28 | 0.03 ± 0.07 |
| C20:4n-6 | 28.0 ± 1.40 | 26.6 ± 2.61 | 26.1 ± 1.87 |
| DBI3 | 1.450 | 1.347 | 1.286 |
1Values are means ± S.D.
2The ratios of linoleic acid to oleic acids
3The double bond index (DBI) equals the sum obtained by multiplying the fraction of each fatty acid times the number of double bonds contained and adding the total together [10].
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0001 compared with beef tallow and olive oil fed groups by Kruskal-Wallis test. Different superscripts for each fatty acid mean significantly different levels among groups.