PURPOSE: To identify a predictive molecular "signature" for sensitivity to retinoic acid in pancreatic cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fourteen patient-derived, low-passage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) lines with varied expression of fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP2) were used to evaluate the response to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). Cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration/invasion assays were used to measure the in vitro response. Tumor growth was monitored in subcutaneous xenografts in athymic nude mice for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Response to ATRA was observed to be dependent upon differential expression of FABP5 versus CRABP2. Thus, elevated FABP5 expression was associated with minimal cytotoxicity and tumor growth inhibition and a paradoxical increase in migration and invasion. Conversely, CRABP2 expression in the absence of FABP5 was associated with significant tumor growth inhibition with ATRA, even in gemcitabine-resistant tumors. The ATRA-resistant phenotype of FABP5(high)CRABP2(null) cells could be circumvented by ectopic expression of CRABP2. Alternatively, reexpression of endogenous CRABP2 could be enabled in FABP5(high)CRABP2(null) PDAC lines by exposure to decitabine and trichostatin A, thereby relieving epigenetic silencing of the CRABP2 gene promoter. Immunohistochemical staining for FABP5 in archival human tissue microarrays identifies a subset of cases (13 of 63, ~20%) which are negative for FABP5 expression and might be candidates for ATRA therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The widely used agent ATRA deserves a "second look" in PDAC, but needs to be targeted to patient subsets with biopsy-proven FABP5-negative tumors, or be combined with a chromatin-modifying agent to reexpress endogenous CRABP2.
PURPOSE: To identify a predictive molecular "signature" for sensitivity to retinoic acid in pancreatic cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fourteen patient-derived, low-passage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) lines with varied expression of fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP2) were used to evaluate the response to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). Cell proliferation, apoptosis, and migration/invasion assays were used to measure the in vitro response. Tumor growth was monitored in subcutaneous xenografts in athymic nude mice for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Response to ATRA was observed to be dependent upon differential expression of FABP5 versus CRABP2. Thus, elevated FABP5 expression was associated with minimal cytotoxicity and tumor growth inhibition and a paradoxical increase in migration and invasion. Conversely, CRABP2 expression in the absence of FABP5 was associated with significant tumor growth inhibition with ATRA, even in gemcitabine-resistant tumors. The ATRA-resistant phenotype of FABP5(high)CRABP2(null) cells could be circumvented by ectopic expression of CRABP2. Alternatively, reexpression of endogenous CRABP2 could be enabled in FABP5(high)CRABP2(null) PDAC lines by exposure to decitabine and trichostatin A, thereby relieving epigenetic silencing of the CRABP2 gene promoter. Immunohistochemical staining for FABP5 in archival human tissue microarrays identifies a subset of cases (13 of 63, ~20%) which are negative for FABP5 expression and might be candidates for ATRA therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The widely used agent ATRA deserves a "second look" in PDAC, but needs to be targeted to patient subsets with biopsy-proven FABP5-negative tumors, or be combined with a chromatin-modifying agent to reexpress endogenous CRABP2.
Authors: Audrey Vincent; Noriyuki Omura; Seung-Mo Hong; Andrew Jaffe; James Eshleman; Michael Goggins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kevin A David; Nigel P Mongan; Christopher Smith; Lorraine J Gudas; David M Nanus Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-05-08 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Marilia F Calmon; Rodrigo V Rodrigues; Carla M Kaneto; Ricardo P Moura; Sabrina D Silva; Louise Danielle C Mota; Daniel G Pinheiro; Cesar Torres; Alex F de Carvalho; Patrícia M Cury; Fabio D Nunes; Ines Nobuko Nishimoto; Fernando A Soares; Adriana M A da Silva; Luis P Kowalski; Helena Brentani; Cleslei F Zanelli; Wilson A Silva; Paula Rahal; Eloiza H Tajara; Dirce M Carraro; Anamaria A Camargo; Sandro R Valentini Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Thaddeus T Schug; Daniel C Berry; Illia A Toshkov; Le Cheng; Alexander Yu Nikitin; Noa Noy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Fieke E M Froeling; Christine Feig; Claude Chelala; Richard Dobson; Charles E Mein; David A Tuveson; Hans Clevers; Ian R Hart; Hemant M Kocher Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: M M Streppel; S Lata; M DelaBastide; E A Montgomery; J S Wang; M I Canto; A M Macgregor-Das; S Pai; F H M Morsink; G J Offerhaus; E Antoniou; A Maitra; W R McCombie Journal: Oncogene Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Liraz Levi; Glenn Lobo; Mary Kathryn Doud; Johannes von Lintig; Darcie Seachrist; Gregory P Tochtrop; Noa Noy Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 12.701