Literature DB >> 16054839

Fooling your feelings: artificially induced referred sensations are linked to a modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex.

Michael Schaefer1, Nina Noennig, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Michael Rotte.   

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrated tactile illusions in healthy subjects by manipulating visual and tactile information. For example, a rubber hand, lying on a table in front of the subject and not connected with the body, can be felt by the subject as belonging to his or her own body by a simple visuotactile manipulation. Aim of the present study was to create an illusion in which the subject feels touch on a body site which is different from the actual touch, hence showing a referral of touch similar to those reported in phantom limb patients. Since it is known from animal studies that tactile illusions can alter early sensory processing, we were interested in the role of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) during this kind of illusion. Thus, we manipulated the visual and tactile information in eight healthy subjects. The participants were stimulated on their fifth digit (D5) while watching a video, which showed a life-sized hand where the first digit (D1) was stimulated, hence inducing a conflict in feeling and seeing. The visual and tactile stimulation was in-phase in one condition and out-of-phase in a control condition. The video was presented in the peripersonal space of the subject at the distance where the real hand would be expected. Subjects reported a referred sensation of feeling the stimulation on D1 instead of D5 when the stimulation was in-phase with the video. Neuromagnetic source imaging of the topography of the functional organization of SI related to tactile stimulation of D1 and D5 showed that the source extent of the cortical representation of D5 increased during the illusion. The results suggest that a simple manipulation of visual and tactile information can induce referred sensations in healthy subjects in a very fast manner. Since the amount of the referred sensation was significantly correlated with the modulation in SI, we argue that SI is involved in this kind of artificially induced referred sensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16054839     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands.

Authors:  George A Michael; Marie-Agnès Dupuy; Amélie Deleuze; Margaux Humblot; Bilitys Simon; Janick Naveteur
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Referred sensations induced by a mirror box in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Jun Takasugi; Daisuke Matsuzawa; Takashi Murayama; Ken Nakazawa; Kenji Numata; Eiji Shimizu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-28

3.  My third arm: shifts in topography of the somatosensory homunculus predict feeling of an artificial supernumerary arm.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Keehoon Kim; James Edward Colgate; Michael A Peshkin; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Anatomically plausible illusory posture affects mental rotation of body parts.

Authors:  Silvio Ionta; Anna Sforza; Mariko Funato; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Visuotactile learning and body representation: an ERP study with rubber hands and rubber objects.

Authors:  Clare Press; Cecilia Heyes; Patrick Haggard; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Sensorimotor incongruence and body perception: an experimental investigation.

Authors:  Jens Foell; Robin Bekrater-Bodmann; Candida S McCabe; Herta Flor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Effects of fusion between tactile and proprioceptive inputs on tactile perception.

Authors:  Jay P Warren; Marco Santello; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Referral of touch and ownership between the hands and the role of the somatosensory cortices.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Franziska Konczak; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of the environment in eliciting phantom-like sensations in non-amputees.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lewis; Donna M Lloyd; Martin J Farrell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.