Literature DB >> 22006929

Risk factors and other epidemiologic considerations for cervical cancer screening: a narrative review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Kimberly K Vesco1, Evelyn P Whitlock, Michelle Eder, Brittany U Burda, Caitlyn A Senger, Kevin Lutz.   

Abstract

Despite the success of cervical cancer screening programs, questions remain about the appropriate time to begin and end screening. This review explores epidemiologic and contextual data on cervical cancer screening to inform decisions about when screening should begin and end. Cervical cancer is rare among women younger than 20 years. Screening for cervical cancer in this age group is complicated by lower rates of detection and higher rates of false-positive results than in older women. Methods used to diagnose and treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia have important potential adverse effects. High-risk human papillomavirus infections and abnormalities on cytologic and histologic examination have relatively high rates of regression. Accordingly, cervical cancer screening in women younger than 20 years may be harmful. The incidence of, and mortality rates from, cervical cancer and the proportion of U.S. women aged 65 years or older who have had a Papanicolaou smear within 3 years have decreased since 2000. Available evidence supports discontinuation of cervical cancer screening among women aged 65 years or older who have had adequate screening and are not otherwise at high risk. Further reductions in the burden of cervical cancer in older women are probably best achieved by focusing on screening those who have not been adequately screened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22006929     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  27 in total

1.  Association between FAS A670G polymorphism and susceptibility to cervical cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Ning-Xia Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-07-31

2.  Knowledge, perceptions, and decision making about human papillomavirus vaccination among Korean American women: a focus group study.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Boyoung Kim; Eunsuk Choi; Youngshin Song; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

3.  Feasibility of blood testing combined with PET-CT to screen for cancer and guide intervention.

Authors:  Anne Marie Lennon; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac Kinde; Andrew Warren; Ashley Honushefsky; Ariella T Cohain; David H Ledbetter; Fred Sanfilippo; Kathleen Sheridan; Dillenia Rosica; Christian S Adonizio; Hee Jung Hwang; Kamel Lahouel; Joshua D Cohen; Christopher Douville; Aalpen A Patel; Leonardo N Hagmann; David D Rolston; Nirav Malani; Shibin Zhou; Chetan Bettegowda; David L Diehl; Bobbi Urban; Christopher D Still; Lisa Kann; Julie I Woods; Zachary M Salvati; Joseph Vadakara; Rosemary Leeming; Prianka Bhattacharya; Carroll Walter; Alex Parker; Christoph Lengauer; Alison Klein; Cristian Tomasetti; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Decisional balance and self-efficacy mediate the association among provider advice, health literacy and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Qian-Li Xue; Benita Walton-Moss; Marie T Nolan; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.398

5.  A qualitative study exploring factors associated with Pap test use among North Korean refugees.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Soohyun Kim; Yoonkyung Chung
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2017-10

6.  Blood-based biomarkers of human papillomavirus-associated cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjana Balachandra; Samuel B Kusin; Rebecca Lee; James-Michael Blackwell; Jasmin A Tiro; Lindsay G Cowell; Cheng-Ming Chiang; Shwu-Yuan Wu; Sanskriti Varma; Erika L Rivera; Helen G Mayo; Lianghao Ding; Baran D Sumer; Jayanthi S Lea; Aditya Bagrodia; Linda M Farkas; Richard Wang; Carole Fakhry; Kristina R Dahlstrom; Erich M Sturgis; Andrew T Day
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Cervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Meg Watson; Philip E Castle; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Molecular cancer prevention: Current status and future directions.

Authors:  Karen Colbert Maresso; Kenneth Y Tsai; Powel H Brown; Eva Szabo; Scott Lippman; Ernest T Hawk
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Cervical cancer screening among young adult women in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Vicki B Benard; Ashwini Soman; Nancy Breen; Deanna Kepka; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Mujer Sana, Familia Fuerte: The Effects of a Culturally-Relevant, Community-Based, <i>Promotores</i> Program to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening among Latinas.

Authors:  A Manuela McDonough; Marcela Vargas; Selena Nguyen-Rodriguez; Melawhy Garcia; Gino Galvez; Britt Rios-Ellis
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.