OBJECTIVE: Although cervical cancer can be prevented through screening and follow-up, Latinas' rate of Pap tests remains low due to knowledge gaps and cultural and attitudinal factors. METHODS: This study used a single-group pre-/post-test design to evaluate the effectiveness of Mujer Sana, Familia Fuerte (Healthy Woman, Strong Family), an intervention intended to improve Latinas' cervical cancer prevention knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy to obtain a Pap test, and intention to get tested. The intervention is delivered through a single session by promotores de salud, who use a culturally competent, linguistically appropriate toolkit. A total of 5,211 Latinas participated in the study. RESULTS: The evaluation indicated that participants had increases in knowledge, positive attitudes, self-efficacy, and intention to test. CONCLUSION: Latinas have a low rate of cervical cancer screening but a high rate of cervical cancer, and Mujer Sana, Familia Fuerte shows promise as a public health practice for use with this population.
OBJECTIVE: Although cervical cancer can be prevented through screening and follow-up, Latinas' rate of Pap tests remains low due to knowledge gaps and cultural and attitudinal factors. METHODS: This study used a single-group pre-/post-test design to evaluate the effectiveness of Mujer Sana, Familia Fuerte (Healthy Woman, Strong Family), an intervention intended to improve Latinas' cervical cancer prevention knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy to obtain a Pap test, and intention to get tested. The intervention is delivered through a single session by promotores de salud, who use a culturally competent, linguistically appropriate toolkit. A total of 5,211 Latinas participated in the study. RESULTS: The evaluation indicated that participants had increases in knowledge, positive attitudes, self-efficacy, and intention to test. CONCLUSION: Latinas have a low rate of cervical cancer screening but a high rate of cervical cancer, and Mujer Sana, Familia Fuerte shows promise as a public health practice for use with this population.
Authors: Kimberly K Vesco; Evelyn P Whitlock; Michelle Eder; Brittany U Burda; Caitlyn A Senger; Kevin Lutz Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Charité N Ricker; Sue Hiyama; Susan Fuentes; Nancy Feldman; Vasanth Kumar; Gwen C Uman; Raluca Nedelcu; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Jeffrey N Weitzel Journal: Prev Med Date: 2006-10-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Anne Marie McCarthy; Tamara Dumanovsky; Kala Visvanathan; Amy R Kahn; Maria J Schymura Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Christine M Pierce Campbell; Lynette J Menezes; Electra D Paskett; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Melanie R Wasserman; Deborah E Bender; Shoou-Yih Lee; Joseph P Morrissey; Ted Mouw; Edward C Norton Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2006-01