Literature DB >> 22006369

Effect of histologic subtype on treatment and outcomes for esophageal cancer in the United States.

Ryan P Merkow1, Karl Y Bilimoria, Martin D McCarter, Warren B Chow, Howard S Gordon, Andrew K Stewart, Clifford Y Ko, David J Bentrem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have distinct clinico-pathologic characteristics; however, it is unclear whether treatment patterns differ by histologic subtype. The objective of this study was to examine differences in treatment use and outcomes by histologic subtype for esophageal cancer in the United States.
METHODS: From the National Cancer Data Base, patients with esophageal cancer were identified. Regression models were formulated to assess the influence of histologic subtype on treatment use and overall survival.
RESULTS: From 1998 to 2007, 80,961 patients were identified with esophageal cancer in the United States. A higher percentage of patients with nonmetastatic AC underwent surgical resection compared with patients with nonmetastatic SCC (AC, 65.7%; SCC, 36.0%; P<.001), who were more often treated with chemoradiotherapy alone (AC, 25.7%; SCC, 54.1%; P<.001). High-volume academic centers used surgery more frequently for both AC and SCC than did other centers, yet even at high-volume academic centers, surgery was used much less often to treat SCC than AC (AC, 79.3%; SCC, 53.7%; P<.001). The likelihood of operative treatment for nonmetastatic disease was significantly lower in patients with SCC compared with patients with AC (P<.001). Overall survival was lower for patients with stage II/III disease of either histologic subtype treated with chemoradiotherapy alone compared with surgery plus chemoradiotherapy (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients with esophageal cancer are being treated nonoperatively, and treatment use varies according to tumor histology, particularly by center type.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22006369     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Vitamin D receptor expression and neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ryan Trowbridge; Poonam Sharma; William J Hunter; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.362

Review 2.  Treatment of esophagogastric junction carcinoma: an unsolved debate.

Authors:  Michele Orditura; Gennaro Galizia; Eva Lieto; Ferdinando De Vita; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Surgery is an essential component of multimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Arlene M Correa; Jaffer A Ajani; Ritsuko U Komaki; James W Welsh; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne L Hofstetter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Racial disparities in esophageal cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Sha'shonda L Revels; Arden M Morris; Rishindra M Reddy; Clifford Akateh; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Racial disparities in surgical resection and survival among elderly patients with poor prognosis cancer.

Authors:  Sha'Shonda L Revels; Mousumi Banerjee; Huiying Yin; Christopher J Sonnenday; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of tumor biomarkers in predicting prognosis in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Meilan Chen; Jizheng Huang; Zhenli Zhu; Jun Zhang; Ke Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Clinical-pathological characteristics and prognosis of a cohort of oesophageal cancer patients: a competing risks survival analysis.

Authors:  Elena Rodríguez-Camacho; Salvador Pita-Fernández; Sonia Pértega-Díaz; Beatriz López-Calviño; Teresa Seoane-Pillado
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.211

8.  Comparison of the surgical treatment strategies for Siewert type II squamous cell carcinoma in the same area as esophagogastric junction carcinoma: data from a single Japanese high-volume cancer center.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yabusaki; Atsushi Nashimoto; Atsushi Matsuki; Masaki Aizawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.