Literature DB >> 22005875

Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent.

Allison E Crepeau1, Bart I McKinney, Maya Fox-Ryvicker, Jennifer Castelli, James Penna, Edward D Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians and society may overestimate the level of patient comprehension during the process of obtaining informed consent for medical and surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to prospectively measure the immediate level of patient comprehension at the time that surgical consent is obtained and the effect of time on this level of understanding. In addition, we studied the effect of sex, education level, and age on comprehension.
METHODS: One hundred patients scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery were enrolled voluntarily into this study. Following discussion of risks and benefits with the surgeon and a reading and explanation of the entire consent form, each patient immediately completed a questionnaire to test recall of the information that had just been reviewed. The same questionnaire was administered to each patient at the first postoperative visit and, if applicable, again at the second postoperative visit. Age, sex, education level, and questionnaire scores were recorded.
RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients completed the questionnaire preoperatively and scored an average of 70.7% correct answers. Seventy-five patients completed the first postoperative questionnaire, scoring an average of 59.5%. Thirty-nine patients completed the second postoperative questionnaire, scoring an average of 60.8%. The decline between the preoperative and the first postoperative score was significant. The mean score did not differ significantly according to sex at any time point. College-educated patients scored higher than patients without a college education did on both the preoperative and postoperative questionnaires, with the difference in the preoperative score being significant. Patients who were less than fifty years old scored higher than older patients did, with the difference in the postoperative score being significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient comprehension and recall immediately following a thorough discussion of the consent form was unexpectedly low. This poor recall deteriorated further between the preoperative visit and the first postoperative visit (a period of no more than two weeks). Greater age and lower education level were associated with poorer comprehension. Sex did not affect any of the scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22005875     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  21 in total

1. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Consent documentation for elective orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Robert M Kenyon; Eoghan Pomeroy; Robert Yeo; James P Cashman
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  The Quality of Informed Consent Forms-a Systematic Review and Critical Analysis.

Authors:  Julia Lühnen; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Evaluation of the Informed Consent Process of a Multicenter Tuberculosis Treatment Trial.

Authors:  Kimberley N Chapman; Eric Pevzner; Joan M Mangan; Peter Breese; Dorcas Lamunu; Robin Shrestha-Kuwahara; Joseph G Nakibali; Stefan V Goldberg
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-02-19

5.  Critical roles of orthopaedic surgeon leadership in healthcare systems to improve orthopaedic surgical patient safety.

Authors:  Calvin C Kuo; William J Robb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Health Literacy in Patients Seeking Orthopaedic Care: Results of the Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems (LIMP) Project.

Authors:  Andrew J Rosenbaum; Denis Pauze; Daniel Pauze; Nancy Robak; Ralph Zade; Michael Mulligan; Richard L Uhl
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

7.  Hands-On Surgical Training Workshop: an Active Role-Playing Patient Education for Adolescents.

Authors:  Apinut Wongkietkachorn; Pangpoom Boonyawong; Peera Rhunsiri; Kasaya Tantiphlachiva
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Syed S Naqvi; Soha Ghanian; Craig P Eberson; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Christopher T Born; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Consent for participating in clinical trials - Is it really informed?

Authors:  Teodora Alexa-Stratulat; Marius Neagu; Anca-Iulia Neagu; Ioana Dana Alexa; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.294

10.  How informed is the informed consent?

Authors:  H Vikas; Ananth Kini; Nishant Sharma; Naveen R Gowda; Anant Gupta
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.