Literature DB >> 29933502

Consent for participating in clinical trials - Is it really informed?

Teodora Alexa-Stratulat, Marius Neagu, Anca-Iulia Neagu, Ioana Dana Alexa, Beatrice Gabriela Ioan.   

Abstract

The article explores the challenges of ensuring voluntary and informed consent which is obtained from potential research subjects in the north-eastern part of Romania. This study is one of the first empirical papers of this nature in Romania. The study used a quantitative survey design using the adapted Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) questionnaire. The target population consisted of 100 adult persons who voluntarily enrolled in clinical trials. The informed consent form must contain details regarding the potential risks and benefits, the aim of the clinical trial, study design, confidentiality, insurance and contact details in case of additional questions. Our study confirmed that although all required information was included in the ICF, few clinical trial participants truly understood it. We also found that the most important predictive factor for a good subjective and objective understanding of the clinical trial was the level of education. Our study suggests that researchers should consider putting more effort in order to help clinical trials participants achieve a better understanding of the informed consent. In this way they will ensure that participants' decision-making is meaningful and that their interests are protected.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; informed consent; participants; understanding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29933502      PMCID: PMC6156924          DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  32 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information.

Authors:  Anita N Shukla; Mary K Daly; Paul Legutko
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent.

Authors:  Allison E Crepeau; Bart I McKinney; Maya Fox-Ryvicker; Jennifer Castelli; James Penna; Edward D Wang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  C Behrendt; T Gölz; C Roesler; H Bertz; A Wünsch
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Legacies of Nuremberg. Medical ethics and human rights.

Authors:  M A Grodin; G J Annas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?

Authors:  Jiwon Koh; Eurah Goh; Kyung-Sang Yu; Belong Cho; Jeong Hee Yang
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Quality and extent of informed consent for invasive procedures: a pilot study at the institutional level in Turkey.

Authors:  H Hanzade Dogan; Elif Işik; Ezgi Vural; Hayriye Vehid; Mayer Brezis
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Neha Parikh; Venkat Goskonda; Ashok Chavan; Larry Dillaha
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  The business case for provider participation in clinical trials research: an application to the National Cancer Institute's community clinical oncology program.

Authors:  Paula H Song; Kristin L Reiter; Bryan J Weiner; Lori Minasian; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

10.  Informed consent: how much awareness is there?

Authors:  Daniel Purcaru; Adrian Preda; Daniela Popa; Marius Alexandru Moga; Liliana Rogozea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Patients' knowledge about their involvement in clinical trials. A non-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pablo Juan-Salvadores; Marcela Sánchez Michel Gómez; Víctor Alfonso Jiménez Díaz; Cristina Martínez Reglero; Andrés Iñiguez Romo
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-20

2.  Methodologic Considerations for Epigenomic Investigation of Preterm Birth in African American Women.

Authors:  Alexandra L Nowak; Carmen Giurgescu; Jodi L Ford; Amy Mackos; Joyce Ohm; Alai Tan; Maciej Pietrzak; Cindy M Anderson
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.