Literature DB >> 30134714

Improving low-accuracy protein structures using enhanced sampling techniques.

Tianwu Zang1, Tianqi Ma1, Qinghua Wang2, Jianpeng Ma1.   

Abstract

In this paper, we report results of using enhanced sampling and blind selection techniques for high-accuracy protein structural refinement. By combining a parallel continuous simulated tempering (PCST) method, previously developed by Zang et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 141, 044113 (2014)], and the structure based model (SBM) as restraints, we refined 23 targets (18 from the refinement category of the CASP10 and 5 from that of CASP12). We also designed a novel model selection method to blindly select high-quality models from very long simulation trajectories. The combined use of PCST-SBM with the blind selection method yielded final models that are better than initial models. For Top-1 group, 7 out of 23 targets had better models (greater global distance test total scores) than the critical assessment of structure prediction participants. For Top-5 group, 10 out of 23 were better. Our results justify the crucial position of enhanced sampling in protein structure prediction and refinement and demonstrate that a considerable improvement of low-accuracy structures is achievable with current force fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30134714      PMCID: PMC5995690          DOI: 10.1063/1.5027243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  52 in total

1.  The free energy landscape for beta hairpin folding in explicit water.

Authors:  R Zhou; B J Berne; R Germain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Valerio Mariani; Florian Kiefer; Tobias Schmidt; Juergen Haas; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-15

5.  Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: 1. Characterizing the Performance of Different Clustering Algorithms.

Authors:  Jianyin Shao; Stephen W Tanner; Nephi Thompson; Thomas E Cheatham
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method.

Authors:  Alessandro Barducci; Giovanni Bussi; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Exploring the protein G helix free-energy surface by solute tempering metadynamics.

Authors:  Carlo Camilloni; Davide Provasi; Guido Tiana; Ricardo A Broglia
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-06

Review 8.  Parallel tempering: theory, applications, and new perspectives.

Authors:  David J Earl; Michael W Deem
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods.

Authors:  J Moult; J T Pedersen; R Judson; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11

10.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Forging tools for refining predicted protein structures.

Authors:  Xingcheng Lin; Nicholas P Schafer; Wei Lu; Shikai Jin; Xun Chen; Mingchen Chen; José N Onuchic; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Refining protein structures using enhanced sampling techniques with restraints derived from an ensemble-based model.

Authors:  Tianqi Ma; Tianwu Zang; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 6.725

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.