Literature DB >> 6521466

Acoustic differentiation of laryngeal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech.

J Robbins.   

Abstract

This investigation was designed to determine if a multivariate acoustic classifier could effectively discriminate group membership for 15 tracheoesophageal, esophageal, and laryngeal speakers. Seven intensity, 10 frequency, and 13 duration measures were quantified from recorded voice samples. Using principal components analysis, a subset of the 13 least redundant acoustic and temporal measures was systematically selected from the 30 original measures and analyzed singly and jointly in terms of its ability to discriminate among the three speaker groups. Discriminant function analysis revealed perfect categorization of the 45 subjects, indicating that the three methods of speech production are acoustically and temporally distinct from one another. The relative importance of the selected variables which, in combination, significantly differentiated the three groups is discussed in relation to physiologic differences among groups and clinical application for postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6521466     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2704.577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  7 in total

1.  Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal voice in male total laryngectomy patients.

Authors:  N Deore; S Datta; R C Dwivedi; R Palav; R Shah; S I Sayed; M Jagde; R Kazi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Glenn Pieters; Jean-Pierre Martens; Marie-Jeanne Van der Borgt; Phillippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Neck and face surface electromyography for prosthetic voice control after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; James T Heaton; Rebecca G Rolland; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Chaos Behavior Analysis of Alaryngeal Voices Including Esophageal (SE) and Tracheoesophageal (TE) Voices.

Authors:  Boquan Liu; Fan Zhang; Ling Chen; Matthew A Silverman; Hengxin Liu; Dehui Fu; Yongwang Huang; Jing Pan; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.391

Review 6.  Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaske E van Sluis; Lisette van der Molen; Rob J J H van Son; Frans J M Hilgers; Patrick A Bhairosing; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Speech rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: long-term results with indwelling voice prosthesis Blom-Singer.

Authors:  Carlos Takahiro Chone; Ana L Spina; Agricio N Crespo; Flavio M Gripp
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-12-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.