C Hohmann1, C Eickhoff, R Radziwill, M Schulz. 1. Department of Medicine, Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Jaegerstraße 49-50, Berlin, Germany. carina.hohmann@klinikum-fulda.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with a high morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. The prevention of SSIs is based on a combination of preoperative preparation, surgical techniques, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and postoperative wound care. Despite an abundance of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of antimicrobials to prevent SSIs, the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this clinical setting is associated with inappropriate timing and selection and excessive duration of administration. To date, pharmacy interns (PIs) have not been involved in this process. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of involving PIs in monitoring adherence to the guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery patients. METHODS: The study was conducted in seven hospitals in Germany within the framework of the project "Pharmacy interns on the ward" (P-STAT2). Twenty-seven PIs participated, either from either May to October 2008 or from November 2008 to April 2009. Each patient admitted to the participating wards was consecutively monitored. PIs documented the antibiotic prophylaxis and checked the adherence with the hospital ward's PAP guidelines taking both the choice of antibiotic drug and the duration of PAP into account. The costs of antibiotics, personnel and material were calculated in cases of non-adherence with guidelines. RESULTS: This is the first time that PIs were involved in monitoring antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. A total of 6,167 patients were enrolled (mean age 58.3 ± 19.6 years; 47.1% male); of these, 5,064 patients underwent surgery and were ultimately available for evaluation. Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis were followed in 70.7% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that many patients do not receive the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis despite the fact that guidelines are in place. Based on these results, we conclude that PIs may play an important role in antibiotic prophylaxis management.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with a high morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. The prevention of SSIs is based on a combination of preoperative preparation, surgical techniques, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and postoperative wound care. Despite an abundance of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of antimicrobials to prevent SSIs, the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this clinical setting is associated with inappropriate timing and selection and excessive duration of administration. To date, pharmacy interns (PIs) have not been involved in this process. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of involving PIs in monitoring adherence to the guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery patients. METHODS: The study was conducted in seven hospitals in Germany within the framework of the project "Pharmacy interns on the ward" (P-STAT2). Twenty-seven PIs participated, either from either May to October 2008 or from November 2008 to April 2009. Each patient admitted to the participating wards was consecutively monitored. PIs documented the antibiotic prophylaxis and checked the adherence with the hospital ward's PAP guidelines taking both the choice of antibiotic drug and the duration of PAP into account. The costs of antibiotics, personnel and material were calculated in cases of non-adherence with guidelines. RESULTS: This is the first time that PIs were involved in monitoring antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. A total of 6,167 patients were enrolled (mean age 58.3 ± 19.6 years; 47.1% male); of these, 5,064 patients underwent surgery and were ultimately available for evaluation. Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis were followed in 70.7% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that many patients do not receive the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis despite the fact that guidelines are in place. Based on these results, we conclude that PIs may play an important role in antibiotic prophylaxis management.
Authors: C E Tourmousoglou; E Ch Yiannakopoulou; V Kalapothaki; J Bramis; J St Papadopoulos Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2007-11-12 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Dale W Bratzler; Peter M Houck; Chesley Richards; Lynn Steele; E Patchen Dellinger; Donald E Fry; Claudia Wright; Allen Ma; Karina Carr; Lisa Red Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2005-02
Authors: Daniela Bertschi; Walter P Weber; Jasmin Zeindler; Daniel Stekhoven; Robert Mechera; Lilian Salm; Marco Kralijevic; Savas D Soysal; Marco von Strauss; Edin Mujagic; Walter R Marti Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Therese M Duane; Fausto Catena; Jeffrey M Tessier; Federico Coccolini; Lillian S Kao; Belinda De Simone; Francesco M Labricciosa; Addison K May; Luca Ansaloni; John E Mazuski Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: H Fukuda; K Morikane; M Kuroki; S Kawai; K Hayashi; Y Ieiri; H Matsukawa; K Okada; F Sakamoto; T Shinzato; S Taniguchi Journal: Infection Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 3.553