Literature DB >> 22001362

Capturing patients' perspectives of treatment in clinical trials/drug development.

Asha Hareendran1, Ari Gnanasakthy, Randall Winnette, Dennis Revicki.   

Abstract

The patient's perspective of treatment outcomes is increasingly important to consumers and providers of healthcare. Recent studies have shown that traditional clinical endpoints may not accurately reflect the patient experience with treatment. Often patients' experience of their disease and associated treatment differs from the perspective of their physicians. When implemented with a clear and effective assessment strategy, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can be used to collect data directly from patients in the clinical setting. These data can be applied to a range of outcomes, such as treatment efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction. Such information is valuable at various stages of drug development and can be used to understand the patient's perspective of the treatment for evaluating the treatment benefit of new products and to engage patients to make decisions about treatment options and ultimately to support commercialization of pharmaceutical products. Recognizing the value of these data, various regulatory agencies have recently released guidelines on how to best implement these measures in clinical trials to support label claims. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the benefits of collecting PRO data for evaluating the outcomes of treatments in clinical trials, through the product life cycle.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22001362     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Role in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Cindy J Nowinski; Deborah M Miller; David Cella
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  The Patient Experience with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Randall Winnette; Lisa M Hess; Steven J Nicol; Datchen Fritz Tai; Catherine Copley-Merriman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.

Authors:  Lill-Brith von Arx; Trine Kjeer
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Data Mining of Free-Text Responses: An Innovative Approach to Analyzing Patient Perspectives on Treatment for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in a Phase IIa Proof-of-Concept Study for Dupilumab.

Authors:  Asif H Khan; Adeline Abbe; Bruno Falissard; Paulo Carita; Claus Bachert; Joaquim Mullol; Matthew Reaney; Jingdong Chao; Leda P Mannent; Nikhil Amin; Puneet Mahajan; Gianluca Pirozzi; Laurent Eckert
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Application of Bother in patient reported outcomes instruments across cultures.

Authors:  Mary C Gawlicki; Shawn M McKown; Matthew J Talbert; Barbara A Brandt
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.186

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.