Literature DB >> 21999700

Gene expression profiling in the Cynomolgus macaque Macaca fascicularis shows variation within the normal birth range.

Bright Starling Emerald1, Keefe Chng, Shinya Masuda, Deborah M Sloboda, Mark H Vickers, Ravi Kambadur, Peter D Gluckman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although an adverse early-life environment has been linked to an increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome, the molecular mechanisms underlying altered disease susceptibility as well as their relevance to humans are largely unknown. Importantly, emerging evidence suggests that these effects operate within the normal range of birth weights and involve mechanisms of developmental palsticity rather than pathology.
METHOD: To explore this further, we utilised a non-human primate model Macaca fascicularis (Cynomolgus macaque) which shares with humans the same progressive history of the metabolic syndrome. Using microarray we compared tissues from neonates in the average birth weight (50-75th centile) to those of lower birth weight (5-25th centile) and studied the effect of different growth trajectories within the normal range on gene expression levels in the umbilical cord, neonatal liver and skeletal muscle.
RESULTS: We identified 1973 genes which were differentially expressed in the three tissue types between average and low birth weight animals (P < 0.05). Gene ontology analysis identified that these genes were involved in metabolic processes including cellular lipid metabolism, cellular biosynthesis, cellular macromolecule synthesis, cellular nitrogen metabolism, cellular carbohydrate metabolism, cellular catabolism, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism, regulation of molecular functions, biological adhesion and development.
CONCLUSION: These differences in gene expression levels between animals in the upper and lower percentiles of the normal birth weight range may point towards early life metabolic adaptations that in later life result in differences in disease risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21999700      PMCID: PMC3210194          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Clinical, experimental and epidemiological studies have highlighted a link between the early-life environment and the health and well-being of offspring in later life. An adverse maternal environment has been linked to an increased risk of developing metabolic and cardiovascular disorders including type 2 diabetes, obesity, hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance and hypertension [1-7]. An important feature of these studies is that these relationships exist within the normative birth range and do not depend on extremes of birth weight. This has led to the proposal that later life disease risk is the result of maladaptive consequences of plastic mechanisms which would normally be adaptive [8,9]. It is proposed that developmental plasticity determines the trajectory of development through epigenetic processes such that the fetus attempts to match its later phenotype to the environment [10]. It has been proposed that low birth weight is a marker of a poor early life nutritional environment [11] and thus a smaller fetus is more likely to develop a metabolic capacity appropriate for a low nutrient postnatal environment. But, if faced with a high nutrient environment it is more likely to become obese and insulin resistant [12]. Although, epigenetic processes have been increasingly implicated largely from rodent studies involving nutritional manipulation of the dam [13,14] the molecular mechanisms underlying altered disease susceptibility are largely unknown. There is also some evidence that these developmental trajectories, and associated long-term gene expression and epigenetic changes can be reversed by the administration of the adipokine leptin to the neonatal rat although the concentrations used were higher than physiological levels [10,12,15,16]. These data suggest that a better understanding of the molecular events associated with impaired early life development may help in designing future intervention strategies. To identify the possible molecular pathways associated with variations in the fetal environment, we have utilised a non-human primate (NHP) model, the Macaca fascicularis (Cynomolgus macaque) to elucidate whether variations within the normal birth weight range are associated with differential gene expressions patterns. Cynomolgus macaques share with humans the same progressive history of the metabolic syndrome [17] which makes this model directly relevant to humans and importantly, Cynomolgus macaque is a monotocous species in which spontaneous variation in fetal growth rather than experimental manipulation can be investigated. This study therefore we have investigated the effect of spontaneous lower birth weight on gene expression in key tissues (umbilical cord, hepatic tissue and skeletal muscle) from female Cynomolgus macaque neonates.

Methods

Collection of Umblical cords

Sixty-five pregnant Cynomolgus macaque dams, sired naturally by one male, were monitored prior to delivery at the Vietnam Primate Breeding and Development Corporation. After birth, dams were sedated (ketamine-HCl; 7 mg/kg) to facilitate collection of the umbilical cord. The cords were collected and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for later analyses. Neonates were weighed at birth and promptly returned to the dams. All animal procedures were approved by Nafovanny, subsidiary of the Ministry of Forestry, Vietnam, and performed in accordance with the guidelines set by the national advisory committee for laboratory animal research (NACLAR) of Singapore.

Collection of hepatic and skeletal muscle samples

The normative birth range was assessed from these 65 pregnancies and 8 neonates were selected based on their birth weights to comprise 2 groups: 1) ; n = 4 classified as those that were within the 5th to 25th birth weight percentile, birth weight range 299-317 g and 2) n = 4 classified as those that were within the 50th to 75th birth weight percentile, birth weight range 358-398 g. The normal gestation of Cynomolgus macaque is approximately 155-170 days [18]. We have estimated the gestational age based on early ultrasound measurements (greatest length of the embryo at the time of pregnancy detection) and used those pregnancies where fetuses were within normal distribution for full term Cynomolgus macaques [18]. On postnatal day 5, neonates were sedated with an intramuscular injection of ketamine-HCl (15 mg/kg), and exsanguinated under anesthesia. Liver and skeletal muscle (biceps femoris) were collected and immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for later analyses

Preparation of Total RNA

Total RNA was isolated from umbilical cords and neonatal tissues using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). RNA integrity was confirmed by bio analyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). An RNA Integrity Number (RIN) value of 7.5 above was considered acceptable and used in further experiments.

Microarray analysis

For microarray analysis, RNA from 6 groups of samples (Cord: ABW and LBW; Liver: ABW and LBW; skeletal muscle: ABW and LBW) were labeled using QuickAmp 1-color labeling kit (Agilent Technologies) according to manufacturer's protocol. The Cy3 labeled cRNA were subsequently hybridized to Agilent Rhesus Macaque (G2519F-015421) Gene Expression microarray. The Rhesus macaque gene expression microarray used in this study represented 43,803 Rhesus monkey probes synthesized as 60-mers spotted using the Agilent SurePrint technology (Agilent Technologies). The microarrays were scanned with Agilent High resolution Scanner and the images were feature extracted using FE software version 10.5 (Agilent Technologies). Data analysis was performed using Genespring GX ver10 (Agilent Technologies). The raw signal intensity from each samples is global normalized to 75th percentile and base-line transformed. Probes flagged with present call in at least 75% of the samples in any of the 6 groups were used for subsequent data analysis. Two-way ANOVA was performed with p value cut-off at 0.05 to identify genes that are differentially expressed in the tissue type and birth weight. Due to limited annotation of Rhesus Monkey genome, the microarray probes are annotated against human genes and ontology. For mapping against the human genome, the probes from the monkey microarray were re-annotated using Agilent eARRAY. The probe sequences were aligned to human genome (hg18) using BLAST based algorithm and the associated human annotation was extracted from the database. To study the gene expression profile of the birth weight in each of the tissue type, Welch T-Test with p-value cut off of 0.05 and fold change of 1.5X was performed between the ABW and LBW samples in each of the tissue groups. Complete microarray data is available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under the accession number GSE32069.

Network Analysis

The microarray data was imported into Pathway Studio version 7 (Ariadne Genomics, Rockville, USA) for network analysis. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed on ABW vs LBW in the respective tissue using Kolmogorov-Smirnov algorithm with p-value cut-off at 0.05. In addition, Network Enrichment Analysis (NEA) was performed to identify expression hub of the treatment. Sub network was generated by connecting entities to their expression target network using the Resnet 7 Mammalian database.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Five up-regulated and two down regulated genes were selected for verification using qRT-PCR. The primers were designed using the Cynomolgus if available or Rhesus macaque sequences using the primer 3 software if not available [19]. The gene symbols and the primers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR:

PASK F 5' CTACTCCGGGAGCTGCTATC 3'
PASK R5' AGCAGCAGAACAGAGGTGTG 3'


116936 F5' GCACATCTGCCTGAAGTGAA 3'

116936 R5' GAGCAGCTTGTCCAGGAAGT 3'


ADK F5' TGGTGGCTCTACCCAGAACT 3'

ADK R5' CATCTACATGGGCTTCAGCA 3'


ELMO F5' AGCTCTGTGTGGCTTGGTTT 3'

ELMO R5' CGGTGTGAATAACGGAGTCCT 3'


SIX1 F5' GTTTAAGAACCGGAGGCAAA 3'

SIX1 R5' GGAGAGAGTTGGTTCTGCTTG 3'


SLC12A9 F5' GGCTTCAACAGCAGTACCCT 3'

SLC12A9 R5' AAGAGGACAGCAAAGACGCT 3'


RBL1 F5' TAGCCTGACCAACATGGAGA 3'

RBL1 R5' GTTCAAGCAATTCTGCCTCA 3'


Uni18SrRNA F5' AGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTACACA 3'

Uni18SrRNA R5' GATCCGAGGGCCTCACTAAAC 3'
Sequences of primers used for qRT-PCR: We used skeletal muscle RNA to verify the array. Briefly, total RNA was extracted as mentioned above from four ABW and four LBW neonates and were reverse transcribed using Applied Biosystem's high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit using 1 μg of total RNA in a reaction volume of 20 μl. The PCR reactions were carried out in 25 μl of SYBR Green Master Mix with 200 ng of cDNA using 7500 real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The comparative Ct method was used to calculate the relative gene expression [20]. 18S RNA was used as the internal control which was validated using the method described in Schmittgen and Livak [20] and found to be stable and consistent.

Results

Two-way factorial ANOVA identified 1973 genes which were differentially expressed in the three tissue types between ABW and LBW neonates (P < 0.05). Of these, 1141 genes were up regulated in the LBW samples while 832 genes were down-regulated in the LBW samples compared to ABW (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Hierarchical clustergram of 1973 genes (1141 up regulated in LBW and 832 down regulated in LBW) identified by ANOVA (P < 0.05) in all the three tissues (umbilical cord (C), liver (L) and skeletal muscle (B) analyzed. The relative expression is reflected by the intensity of the color (Green = down regulated, red = up regulated)

Hierarchical clustergram of 1973 genes (1141 up regulated in LBW and 832 down regulated in LBW) identified by ANOVA (P < 0.05) in all the three tissues (umbilical cord (C), liver (L) and skeletal muscle (B) analyzed. The relative expression is reflected by the intensity of the color (Green = down regulated, red = up regulated) Gene expression profiles of umbilical cord, liver and skeletal muscle were also compared using Welch-t-test. There were 250 genes significantly and differently expressed in the liver, 850 genes significantly and differently expressed in the skeletal muscle and 891 genes significantly and differently expressed in cord samples (P < 0.05, >1.5 fold difference) (Figure 2, 3). The top 50 genes whose gene expression levels changed in each tissue based on their fold difference based on Welch T-test are given in Tables 2, 3, 4.
Figure 2

Heat map depicting the differentially expressed genes in skeletal muscle (850 genes), liver (210 genes) and cord (891 genes) (P < 0.05, >= 1.5 fold difference). A. 733 genes (584 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle, 149 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle), B. 19 genes (16 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 15 genes up regulated in LBW liver, 3 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 4 genes down regulated in liver). C 182 genes (115 genes up regulated in LBW liver and 67 genes down regulated in LBW liver). D 5 genes (2 genes up regulated in LBW cords and 3 genes up regulated LBW liver, 3 genes down regulated in LBW cords and 2 genes down regulated in LBW liver). E. 788 genes (338 genes up regulated in LBW cord and 450 genes down regulated LBW cord). F. 94 genes (60 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 22 up regulated in LBW cord, 34 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 72 genes down regulated in LBW cord. G. 4 genes (4 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and liver, 4 genes down regulated in LBW cord).

Figure 3

Venn diagram depicting the differentially expressed genes in skeletal muscle (850 genes), liver (210 genes) and cord (891 genes) t-test unpaired unequal variance, LBW .

Table 2

List of top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in the skeletal muscle based on fold difference (t-test).

Gene Symbol2Way ANOVA P valueFold Change in Skeletal muscle, Welch t-testRegulation in LBWFold change Liver, Welch t-testRegulation in LBWFold change in Cords, Welch t-testRegulation in LBWGene name
XM_1169360.01791330610.054285up1.080386up2.185324upPREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to RIKEN cDNA 4832428D23 gene (LOC196541) mRNA [XM_116936]

XM_0562540.0218957929.569201up2.09208down1.391897upPREDICTED: Homo sapiens heparan sulfate (glucosamine) 3-O-sulfotransferase 4 (HS3ST4) mRNA [XM_056254]
C5orf230.014753296.0808635up1.072585up1.301361upHomo sapiens chromosome 5 open reading frame 23 (C5orf23), mRNA [NM_024563]

PASK0.034264265.977056up2.995584up19.17474upHomo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), mRNA [NM_015148]
WDR80.0046812345.6804295down2.978104down8.061375downHomo sapiens WD repeat domain 8 (WDR8), mRNA [NM_017818]

ADK1.63E-045.639505down1.368648down9.386349downHomo sapiens adenosine kinase (ADK), transcript variant ADK-short, mRNA [NM_001123]
APOBEC3G0.0406987034.8567457down1.669566down1.105857downHomo sapiens apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G), mRNA [NM_021822]

CCL20.0021212434.757898down1.287543down2.895307downHomo sapiens chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), mRNA [NM_002982]
A_01_P0133900.0298690654.6248507down1.099004down1.527467down

BC0442260.046778914.3998837down1.966762down1.502299downHomo sapiens myosin binding protein H, mRNA [BC044226]
CCL110.0089925194.050988down3.178148down1.002582upHomo sapiens chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11 (CCL11), mRNA [NM_002986]

POU4F30.024599943.8642302up1.615214up1.991698downHomo sapiens POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 3 (POU4F3), mRNA [NM_002700]
XR_0117940.0105198723.7855186up3.637105up2.76764upPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN)-like domain containing 1 (LOC707835), mRNA [XR_011794]

H1FOO0.0111093263.7804163up1.404401up1.449255downHomo sapiens H1 histone family, member O, oocyte-specific (H1FOO), mRNA [NM_153833]
C17orf750.0013625313.7583363down3.447702down1.443745downHomo sapiens chromosome 17 open reading frame 75 (C17orf75), mRNA [NM_022344]

RNF2160.0016507853.7307158down1.504036down6.793567downHomo sapiens TRIAD3 protein (TRIAD3), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_207111]
GTSF10.0170402793.6632807up4.653995up2.487166upHomo sapiens family with sequence similarity 112, member B (FAM112B), mRNA [NM_144594]

C13orf330.0062149883.5870998down2.664488down1.061963upHomo sapiens chromosome 13 open reading frame 33 (C13orf33), mRNA [NM_032849]
CA20.0333408643.5736616down3.483002down1.194329upHomo sapiens carbonic anhydrase II (CA2), mRNA [NM_000067]

CO6457730.037049073.5384166down2.022003down1.474969downILLUMIGEN_MCQ_30118 Katze_MMPB Macaca mulatta cDNA clone IBIUW:22572 5' similar to Bases 1 to 42 highly similar to human RARRES3 (Hs.17466), mRNA sequence [CO645773]
MYST30.0134099073.3029778up2.827006up1.403819upHomo sapiens MYST histone acetyltransferase (monocytic leukemia) 3 (MYST3), mRNA [NM_006766]

NM_0009770.0085619923.2655115up2.138359up2.014805upHomo sapiens ribosomal protein L13 (RPL13), transcript variant 1, mRNA. [NM_000977]
XR_0142650.0013825463.2319098down1.270026down2.168579downPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC716045 (LOC716045), mRNA [XR_014265]

NM_0010046850.0434429053.1747854up1.353824up1.407273downHomo sapiens olfactory receptor, family 2, subfamily F, member 2 (OR2F2), mRNA. [NM_001004685]
XR_0142040.0292259343.167453down3.849135down1.084816upPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC719546 (LOC719546), mRNA [XR_014204]

DARS3.99E-053.1527941down1.10567down12.63266downHomo sapiens aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (DARS), mRNA [NM_001349]
GYLTL1B9.45E-043.143812up1.169517up3.19979upHomo sapiens glycosyltransferase-like 1B (GYLTL1B), mRNA [NM_152312]

CNNM21.94E-043.1423542up1.00608down1.785853upHomo sapiens cyclin M2 (CNNM2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_017649]
C20orf260.0232108093.1168563up1.353857up1.414684upHomo sapiens chromosome 20 open reading frame 26 (C20orf26), mRNA [NM_015585]

SLC26A90.0420997663.0884879up2.137558up1.776504upHomo sapiens solute carrier family 26, member 9 (SLC26A9), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_052934]
SEC14L30.0255272913.0402198up1.787294up1.547541downHomo sapiens SEC14-like 3 (S. cerevisiae) (SEC14L3), mRNA [NM_174975]

TMEM200.0010558412.9346027down1.821723down1.558415downHomo sapiens transmembrane protein 20 (TMEM20), mRNA [NM_153226]
UHRF10.0428540262.9323897down1.272487down1.455897downHomo sapiens ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING finger domains, 1 (UHRF1), transcript variant 2, mRNA [NM_013282]

CST9L0.0085728642.9286344up1.46455up1.695363downHomo sapiens cystatin 9-like (mouse) (CST9L), mRNA [NM_080610]
C20.0054257312.906241down1.470166down1.228973upHomo sapiens complement component 2 (C2), mRNA [NM_000063]

C7orf620.033732792.8281868up1.466387up1.326441downHomo sapiens hypothetical protein MGC26647 (MGC26647), mRNA [NM_152706]
HOXB130.0084046982.822795up1.530259up1.061908downHomo sapiens homeobox B13 (HOXB13), mRNA [NM_006361]

ANLN0.0269289152.8110342down1.205709down1.210447downHomo sapiens anillin, actin binding protein (ANLN), mRNA [NM_018685]
TMEM45B0.028369522.789488up1.108079up1.434473upHomo sapiens transmembrane protein 45B (TMEM45B), mRNA [NM_138788]

COL8A20.0291335842.7760508down1.111961down2.334076downHomo sapiens collagen, type VIII, alpha 2 (COL8A2), mRNA [NM_005202]
IL15RA3.56E-052.7710447down2.542192down5.776398downHomo sapiens interleukin 15 receptor, alpha (IL15RA), transcript variant 2, mRNA [NM_172200]

AY9372480.0026210242.7557867up1.074139down2.046131upMacaca mulatta placental protein 14 mRNA, complete cds [AY937248]
SCN3B0.001994752.7342772up1.566765up1.26591upHomo sapiens sodium channel, voltage-gated, type III, beta (SCN3B), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_018400]

TRIM60.0054246262.7181938up1.451755up1.960095upHomo sapiens tripartite motif-containing 6 (TRIM6), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001003818]
TNS40.0416287032.7158492up1.315606up1.297834downHomo sapiens tensin 4 (TNS4), mRNA [NM_032865]

PDE1C0.0269032682.6685586up1.596604up1.15087downHomo sapiens phosphodiesterase 1C, calmodulin-dependent 70kDa (PDE1C), mRNA [NM_005020]
S100A40.018362042.656307down1.047433down2.01034downHomo sapiens S100 calcium binding protein A4 (S100A4), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_002961]

AADACL10.0179241232.6216743down1.119603down1.47176downHomo sapiens arylacetamide deacetylase-like 1 (AADACL1), mRNA [NM_020792]
XR_0113450.0292551242.6165082up1.450092up1.492756downPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to otoancorin isoform 1 (LOC699600), mRNA [XR_011345]

FN10.020289522.6025481down1.05622down1.051482downHomo sapiens fibronectin 1 (FN1), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_212482]
SP73.05E-042.5985072up1.616763up1.088733downHomo sapiens Sp7 transcription factor (SP7), mRNA [NM_152860]
Table 3

List of top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in liver based on fold difference (t-test).

Gene Symbol2Way ANOVA P valueFold Change in Liver Welch t-testRegulation in LBWFold change skeletal tissue, Welch t-testRegulation in LBWFold change in Cords, Welch t-testRegulation in LBWGene name
ELMOD10.01142517725.931845down1.737314down2.051013upHomo sapiens ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 1 (ELMOD1), mRNA [NM_018712]

RBBP90.02672903611.012514down1.47388down5.131376downHomo sapiens retinoblastoma binding protein 9 (RBBP9), mRNA [NM_006606]
MMP250.00132530710.996225down2.384582down1.436251downHomo sapiens matrix metallopeptidase 25 (MMP25), mRNA [NM_022468]

C5orf460.04776238310.762607down1.234639up1.096919upHomo sapiens similar to AVLV472 (MGC23985), mRNA [NM_206966]
GOLSYN2.29E-056.13113up1.05566up1.458383upHomo sapiens hypothetical protein FLJ20366 (FLJ20366), mRNA [NM_017786]

LCN150.0052916655.3478875up1.891747up2.217465upHomo sapiens MSFL2541 (UNQ2541), mRNA [NM_203347]
CCDC1460.0306615215.281487up1.06658up1.360575upHomo sapiens KIAA1505 protein (KIAA1505), mRNA [NM_020879]

AK0949290.0011182425.262121up1.690864up1.110624upHomo sapiens cDNA FLJ37610 fis, clone BRCOC2011398. [AK094929]
SORCS30.003289175.0026994up2.266284up2.921157upHomo sapiens sortilin-related VPS10 domain containing receptor 3 (SORCS3), mRNA [NM_014978]

COL4A40.015713774.897748down1.548386down1.059327downHomo sapiens collagen, type IV, alpha 4 (COL4A4), mRNA [NM_000092]
IL1R20.0043474554.777918down1.8715down1.690538downHomo sapiens interleukin 1 receptor, type II (IL1R2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_004633]

CD200R10.049674094.7169123down1.052303up1.319852downHomo sapiens CD200 receptor 1 (CD200R1), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_138806]
GTSF10.0170402794.653995up3.663281up2.487166upHomo sapiens family with sequence similarity 112, member B (FAM112B), mRNA [NM_144594]

SNAI10.0050386174.582946down1.534132down1.847129downHomo sapiens snail homolog 1 (Drosophila) (SNAI1), mRNA [NM_005985]
USH1C0.005057424.3276477up1.595945up1.465964upHomo sapiens Usher syndrome 1C (autosomal recessive, severe) (USH1C), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_005709]

ALLC0.0067095124.060955up1.861818up2.766094upHomo sapiens allantoicase (ALLC), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_018436]
CXCL30.049037583.9091544down1.096309down1.172056upHomo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 3 (CXCL3), mRNA [NM_002090]

XR_0142040.0292259343.8491352down3.167453down1.084816upPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC719546 (LOC719546), mRNA [XR_014204]
XR_0117940.0105198723.637105up3.785519up2.76764upPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN)-like domain containing 1 (LOC707835), mRNA [XR_011794]

NMNAT20.0456852063.6255727up2.521069down2.189285upHomo sapiens nicotinamide nucleotide adenylyltransferase 2 (NMNAT2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_015039]
SLC39A80.0415057133.6139402down1.366996down1.390711downHomo sapiens solute carrier family 39 (zinc transporter), member 8 (SLC39A8), mRNA [NM_022154]

CA20.0333408643.4830022down3.573662down1.194329upHomo sapiens carbonic anhydrase II (CA2), mRNA [NM_000067]
NTRK30.0038905983.4711208up1.593136up1.043792downHomo sapiens neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 3 (NTRK3), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001012338]

C17orf750.0013625313.4477015down3.758336down1.443745downHomo sapiens chromosome 17 open reading frame 75 (C17orf75), mRNA [NM_022344]
CXCL10.0069568453.392382down1.063934up4.611126downHomo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (melanoma growth stimulating activity, alpha) (CXCL1), mRNA [NM_001511]

NM_1986920.031943523.3605232down1.343767up1.654617downHomo sapiens keratin associated protein 10-11 (KRTAP10-11), mRNA. [NM_198692]
SHANK20.0232801383.3547363up1.255762up1.189415downHomo sapiens SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 2 (SHANK2), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_012309]

CCDC810.0049824373.2717588down1.533572down4.912844downHomo sapiens coiled-coil domain containing 81 (CCDC81), mRNA [NM_021827]
CCL110.0089925193.1781478down4.050988down1.002582upHomo sapiens chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11 (CCL11), mRNA [NM_002986]

CO6473860.0207765573.1651435down1.030158down1.631509downILLUMIGEN_MCQ_40418 Katze_MMPB2 Macaca mulatta cDNA clone IBIUW:21432 5' similar to Bases 185 to 778 highly similar to human CXCL2 (Hs.75765), mRNA sequence [CO647386]
GPR980.0247524883.1570897down1.10821down3.919889downHomo sapiens G protein-coupled receptor 98 (GPR98), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_032119]

TMEM59L5.34E-043.137047up1.57364up1.407988upHomo sapiens transmembrane protein 59-like (TMEM59L), mRNA [NM_012109]
UGT1A60.0400700463.1353552down2.066639down1.399845downHomo sapiens UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A6 (UGT1A6), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001072]

KCNE27.02E-043.1135461up1.972823up1.170852downHomo sapiens potassium voltage-gated channel, Isk-related family, member 2 (KCNE2), mRNA [NM_172201]
XR_0123760.0225542933.0699794down1.9303down1.439485downPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta hypothetical protein LOC710335 (LOC710335), mRNA [XR_012376]

RXFP10.0020978083.0400152up1.931833up1.276558upHomo sapiens relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1), mRNA [NM_021634]
ITGBL10.028612613.0041916down2.563332down1.243521downHomo sapiens integrin, beta-like 1 (with EGF-like repeat domains) (ITGBL1), mRNA [NM_004791]

PASK0.034264262.995584up5.977056up19.17474upHomo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), mRNA [NM_015148]
DEFB10.0049495562.9797235down1.065357up2.807533downHomo sapiens defensin, beta 1 (DEFB1), mRNA [NM_005218]

WDR80.0046812342.9781044down5.68043down8.061375downHomo sapiens WD repeat domain 8 (WDR8), mRNA [NM_017818]
RIMS40.041128272.9677074up1.724443up1.024011downHomo sapiens regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 4 (RIMS4), mRNA [NM_182970]

PDGFRL0.0113966752.9371088down1.21306down1.55284downHomo sapiens platelet-derived growth factor receptor-like (PDGFRL), mRNA [NM_006207]
TNRC40.0059306192.9251838up1.208589up1.396738upHomo sapiens trinucleotide repeat containing 4 (TNRC4), mRNA [NM_007185]

UGT2B110.025187662.9193914down1.09908down2.958316downHomo sapiens UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B11 (UGT2B11), mRNA [NM_001073]
FLT3LG0.0297935942.8908129up1.037797down1.527226upHomo sapiens fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3LG), mRNA [NM_001459]

IP6K30.039003142.8685477up1.471319up1.39455downHomo sapiens inositol hexaphosphate kinase 3 (IHPK3), mRNA [NM_054111]
ST6GALNAC10.036695312.8622296down1.408642down2.126189downHomo sapiens ST6 (alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminyl-2,3-beta-galactosyl-1,3)-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 1 (ST6GALNAC1), mRNA [NM_018414]

EFNA40.0070862682.843187down1.084758up2.766163downHomo sapiens ephrin-A4 (EFNA4), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_005227]
MYST30.0134099072.827006up3.302978up1.403819upHomo sapiens MYST histone acetyltransferase (monocytic leukemia) 3 (MYST3), mRNA [NM_006766]

XM_3707150.0016140592.7565975up1.561267up2.382949upPREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to hypothetical protein MGC48915 (LOC387911), mRNA [XM_370715]
NM_0314360.0357838532.6903787up1.740635up1.698687upHomo sapiens aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C-like 2 (AKR1CL2), mRNA. [NM_031436]
Table 4

Top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in cord based on fold difference (t-test).

Gene Symbol2Way ANOVA P valueFold Change in cord, Welch t-testRegulation in LBWFold change skeletal tissue, Welch t-testRegulation in LBWFold change in liver,Regulation in LBWGene name
ATP5F10.00350421729.998667down1.850386down1.153583downHomo sapiens ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F0 complex, subunit B1 (ATP5F1), nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, mRNA [NM_001688]

EHHADH3.25E-0529.713446down1.004504up1.027032downHomo sapiens enoyl-Coenzyme A, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl Coenzyme A dehydrogenase (EHHADH), mRNA [NM_001966]
CNPY26.12E-0524.275322down2.033511down1.345912downHomo sapiens transmembrane protein 4 (TMEM4), mRNA [NM_014255]

IMMP1L5.31E-0421.21959down1.067236down1.052987upHomo sapiens IMP1 inner mitochondrial membrane peptidase-like (S. cerevisiae) (IMMP1L), mRNA [NM_144981]
GNL20.00884567619.523186down1.389994down1.352022upHomo sapiens guanine nucleotide binding protein-like 2 (nucleolar) (GNL2), mRNA [NM_013285]

HRSP120.01064473819.35189down1.121147up1.013192upHomo sapiens heat-responsive protein 12 (HRSP12), mRNA [NM_005836]
CN6436392.57E-0519.177528down1.710693down1.132373upILLUMIGEN_MCQ_8235 Katze_MMBR Macaca mulatta cDNA clone IBIUW:3333 5' similar to Bases 1 to 682 highly similar to human Unigene Hs.513885, mRNA sequence [CN643639]

PASK0.0342642619.17474up5.977056up2.995584upHomo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), mRNA [NM_015148]
NDUFC11.93E-0418.786453down1.418954down1.095977upHomo sapiens NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1, subcomplex unknown, 1, 6 kDa (NDUFC1), mRNA [NM_002494]

BNIP3L3.67E-0518.46857down2.523903down1.123252downHomo sapiens BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa interacting protein 3-like (BNIP3L), mRNA [NM_004331]
GALE0.00403012318.304993down1.591229up1.378757downHomo sapiens UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (GALE), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_000403]

XM_3718372.06E-0618.251152down1.76245down1.15429downPREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to oxidoreductase UCPA (LOC389416), mRNA [XM_371837]
OSTCL9.90E-0517.57389down1.173702down1.075778downHomo sapiens similar to RIKEN cDNA 2310008M10 (LOC202459), mRNA [NM_145303]

WDR757.83E-0517.02899down2.353145down1.037028downHomo sapiens WD repeat domain 75 (WDR75), mRNA [NM_032168]
SMPDL3A1.25E-0516.127317down1.290077down1.780315downHomo sapiens sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, acid-like 3A (SMPDL3A), mRNA [NM_006714]

LIN7C6.29E-0415.929515down1.429568down1.006664downHomo sapiens lin-7 homolog C (C. elegans) (LIN7C), mRNA [NM_018362]
COX7B8.03E-0615.9135065down1.283232down1.138854upHomo sapiens cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIb (COX7B), nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, mRNA [NM_001866]

MRPL11.35E-0615.901582down1.776047down1.05264upHomo sapiens mitochondrial ribosomal protein L1 (MRPL1), nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein, mRNA [NM_020236]
NPM33.58E-0415.357531down1.39378down1.314134upHomo sapiens nucleophosmin/nucleoplasmin, 3 (NPM3), mRNA [NM_006993]

RNF1264.43E-0415.14725down1.165075down1.084156downHomo sapiens ring finger protein 126 (RNF126), transcript variant 2, mRNA [NM_194460]
ATG4C1.86E-0614.422242down1.01449down1.571663downHomo sapiens ATG4 autophagy related 4 homolog C (S. cerevisiae) (ATG4C), transcript variant 7, mRNA [NM_032852]

ACMSD2.00E-0414.3137down1.121731up1.098467downHomo sapiens aminocarboxymuconate semialdehyde decarboxylase (ACMSD), mRNA [NM_138326]
WASF30.002695514.211387down1.134297down1.574282upHomo sapiens WAS protein family, member 3 (WASF3), mRNA [NM_006646]

F13B1.26E-0513.94526down1.052562down1.02993downHomo sapiens coagulation factor XIII, B polypeptide (F13B), mRNA [NM_001994]
HNRNPA1L20.00730523913.879195down1.288451up1.062584downHomo sapiens heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1-like (LOC144983), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_001011724]

XR_0117370.00194029413.592515down1.736661down1.168041upPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to transcription factor B2, mitochondrial (LOC710669), mRNA [XR_011737]
CP1.42E-0413.285389down1.122256down1.274657downHomo sapiens ceruloplasmin (ferroxidase) (CP), mRNA [NM_000096]

TOLLIP1.59E-0412.683504down1.156986down1.00844downHomo sapiens toll interacting protein (TOLLIP), mRNA [NM_019009]
DARS3.99E-0512.632657down3.152794down1.10567downHomo sapiens aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (DARS), mRNA [NM_001349]

CKLF4.24E-0412.476327down1.130294down1.064736downHomo sapiens chemokine-like factor (CKLF), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_016951]
STT3B1.13E-0412.457355down2.027118down1.030927downHomo sapiens STT3, subunit of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex, homolog B (S. cerevisiae) (STT3B), mRNA [NM_178862]

TXNDC114.40E-0512.377014down1.525444down1.011564downHomo sapiens thioredoxin domain containing 11 (TXNDC11), mRNA [NM_015914]
CR6031059.80E-0412.209639down1.284419down1.155491downfull-length cDNA clone CS0DF006YN22 of Fetal brain of Homo sapiens (human) [CR603105]

XR_0106725.09E-0511.634537down1.602301down1.059423upPREDICTED: Macaca mulatta similar to Molybdenum cofactor synthesis protein 2 large subunit (Molybdopterin synthase large subunit) (MPT synthase large subunit) (MOCS2B) (MOCO1-B) (LOC703049), mRNA [XR_010672]
GDE10.0391764611.536806down1.190901up1.20255upHomo sapiens membrane interacting protein of RGS16 (MIR16), mRNA [NM_016641]

CFHR22.07E-0411.37657down1.208862down1.032327downHomo sapiens complement factor H-related 2 (CFHR2), mRNA [NM_005666]
RPL300.0306746211.374878down1.173423up1.096937upHomo sapiens ribosomal protein L30 (RPL30), mRNA [NM_000989]

XM_4958850.00242900911.322625down1.165255down1.156577downPREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to ribosomal protein S12 (LOC440055), mRNA [XM_495885]
NDUFB12.13E-0411.293429down1.404433down1.277028upHomo sapiens NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplex, 1, 7 kDa (NDUFB1), mRNA [NM_004545]

NM_0328072.89E-0411.240869down1.075345down1.014724downHomo sapiens F-box protein, helicase, 18 (FBXO18), transcript variant 1, mRNA. [NM_032807]
CSGALNACT 21.34E-0511.216295down1.714551down1.080183downHomo sapiens chondroitin sulfate GalNAcT-2 (GALNACT-2), mRNA [NM_018590]

NM_0223330.00259848810.94874down1.130622up1.014866downHomo sapiens TIA1 cytotoxic granule-associated RNA binding protein-like 1 (TIAL1), ranscript variant 2, mRNA [NM_022333]
NM_0328070.00117293110.342792down1.522541down1.139832downHomo sapiens F-box protein, helicase, 18 (FBXO18), transcript variant 1, mRNA. [NM_032807]

AAMP2.62E-0510.171815down1.560637down1.085371downHomo sapiens angio-associated, migratory cell protein (AAMP), mRNA [NM_001087]
ESF11.02E-079.745275down1.620818down1.008674downHomo sapiens ESF1, nucleolar pre-rRNA processing protein, homolog (S. cerevisiae) (ESF1), mRNA [NM_016649]

DOCK70.017997089.74066down1.174452up1.171709upHomo sapiens dedicator of cytokinesis 7 (DOCK7), mRNA [NM_033407]
DDX3Y4.78E-069.687978down1.356089down1.134329downHomo sapiens DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3, Y-linked (DDX3Y), mRNA [NM_004660]

XIAP3.65E-059.587557down1.882389down1.280735upHomo sapiens baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 4 (BIRC4), mRNA [NM_001167]
TRPC4AP9.51E-059.4549885down1.340843down1.07043upHomo sapiens transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4 associated protein (TRPC4AP), transcript variant 1, mRNA [NM_015638]

ADK1.63E-049.386349down5.639505down1.368648downHomo sapiens adenosine kinase (ADK), transcript variant ADK-short, mRNA [NM_001123]
NM_0010022 923.92E-049.258961down1.016391up1.220083downHomo sapiens chromosome 1 open reading frame 139 (C1orf139), transcript variant 2, mRNA. [NM_001002292]
Heat map depicting the differentially expressed genes in skeletal muscle (850 genes), liver (210 genes) and cord (891 genes) (P < 0.05, >= 1.5 fold difference). A. 733 genes (584 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle, 149 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle), B. 19 genes (16 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 15 genes up regulated in LBW liver, 3 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 4 genes down regulated in liver). C 182 genes (115 genes up regulated in LBW liver and 67 genes down regulated in LBW liver). D 5 genes (2 genes up regulated in LBW cords and 3 genes up regulated LBW liver, 3 genes down regulated in LBW cords and 2 genes down regulated in LBW liver). E. 788 genes (338 genes up regulated in LBW cord and 450 genes down regulated LBW cord). F. 94 genes (60 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 22 up regulated in LBW cord, 34 genes down regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 72 genes down regulated in LBW cord. G. 4 genes (4 genes up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and liver, 4 genes down regulated in LBW cord). Venn diagram depicting the differentially expressed genes in skeletal muscle (850 genes), liver (210 genes) and cord (891 genes) t-test unpaired unequal variance, LBW . List of top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in the skeletal muscle based on fold difference (t-test). List of top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in liver based on fold difference (t-test). Top 50 genes significantly differentially regulated in cord based on fold difference (t-test). Of the 250 genes which were differently expressed in the liver, 182 genes were unique to the liver (115 genes up regulated in the LBW group and 67 genes down-regulated in the LBW group). There were 19 genes which were significantly and differently expressed between liver and skeletal muscle (16 up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 15 genes up regulated in liver and 3 down-regulated in the LBW skeletal muscle and 4 down regulated in LBW liver). There were 5 genes which are significantly and differently expressed between liver and cord (3 up regulated in LBW liver and 2 genes up regulated in LBW cord and 2 down regulated in LBW liver and 3 down regulated in the cord). Of the 850 genes significantly and differently expressed in skeletal muscle, 733 genes were specific to the skeletal muscle; i.e. showed altered regulation only in the skeletal muscle (584 genes up regulated in the LBW samples and 149 genes down regulated in the LBW group). There were 94 genes which were significantly and differently expressed between skeletal muscle and cord (60 up regulated in LBW skeletal muscle and 22 genes up regulated in LBW cord and 34 genes down regulated in the LBW skeletal muscle and 72 genes down regulated in the LBW cord). Of the 891 genes significantly and differently expressed in umbilical cord; 788 genes showed altered regulation only in umbilical cord (338 genes up regulated and 450 genes down regulated in LBW group). There were 4 genes which are significantly and differently expressed between liver, skeletal muscle and umbilical cord (4 genes up regulated in the LBW skeletal muscle and liver while the same four genes were down regulated in LBW cord) Figure 2, 3.

Functional classification of genes

Gene ontology was used to classify genes based on functional significance. The main component of the Gene Ontology (GO) annotation taken into consideration was metabolic function. Genes were classified into fifteen functional categories: Cellular lipid metabolic process (43 genes), Cellular biosynthetic process (95 genes), Cellular macromolecule synthesis (222 genes), Cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process (10 genes), Cellular carbohydrate metabolic process (6 genes), Cellular catabolic process (9 genes), Nucelobase, Nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process (216 genes), Other cellular metabolic process (29 genes), Other metabolic process (36 genes), Transport (141 genes), Regulation of molecular functions (28 genes), Biological adhesion (27 genes), Developmental process (74 genes) Other biological processes (252 genes) and Non classified (795) with p-value of (p > 0.05). The genes enriched for each GO term were further classified into the number of genes up regulated or down regulated in each tissue with a fold difference of 1.5 or greater (Table 5) (Additional file 1).
Table 5

Gene ontology classification to group genes using Genespring ver10 (Agilent Tech, Santa Clara) of similar functional families.

Skeletal muscleLiverCord

Up regulatedDown regulatedUp regulatedDown regulatedUp regulatedDown regulated

Cellular lipid metabolic process156441311
Cellular biosynthesis process814641640

Cellular macromolecule synthesis213219144563

Cellular nitrogen metabolic process414071

Cellular carbohydrate metabolic process200021

Cellular catabolic process120021

Nucleobase, Nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process19171546643

Other cellular metabolic process3213315

Other metabolic process5752911

Transport301721143926

Regulation of molecular functions4211128

Biological adhesion6845810

Developmental process1911742016

Other biological process383825196559
Gene ontology classification to group genes using Genespring ver10 (Agilent Tech, Santa Clara) of similar functional families. To validate the micoarray results we carried out quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) using the same RNA samples in the microarray analysis. We selected seven genes (a novel gene XM_116936, PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase (PASK), Adenisine kinase (ADK) transcript variant ADK-short, ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 1 (ELMOD1), Sine oculins homeobox homolog 1 (SIX1) Retinoblastoma like-1 (RBL1) and Solute carrier family 12 (potassium/chloride transporters) member 9 (SLC12A9) for this validation of the array using skeletal muscle cDNA. Of these 5 genes were significantly up regulated in the array and 2 genes were significantly down regulated in the array. Our results from the qPCR complement our results from the microarray (Table 6). The fold differences along with the values which derived from the microarray are presented in Table 6.
Table 6

Verification of seven genes from the microarray using Real-time RT-PCR analysis in skeletal muscle.

Gene Symbol and description2 way ANOVA p-value (Birth weight)Microarray Fold change (t-Test)Regulation in LBWqPCR-Fold Change
XM_1169360.01791330610.054285Up regulated
PREDICTED: Homo sapiens similar to RIKEN cDNA 4832428D23 gene4.780893

PASK:0.034264265.977056Up regulated
Homo sapiens PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase14.55481
ADK:1.63E-04-5.639505Down regulated
Homo sapiens adenosine kinase, (transcript variant ADK-short)-3.57235

ELMOD1:
Homo sapiens ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 1.0.011425177-1.7373136Down regulated-1.71015
SIX1:
Homo sapiens sine oculis homeobox homolog 1 (Drosophila).0.0457281321.1253903Up in low birth weight1.246574

RBL1:
Homo sapiens retinoblastoma-like 1 (p107), (transcript variant 1)0.0117053141.5320477Up regulated3.023726
SLC12A9:
Homo sapiens solute carrier family 12 (potassium/chloride transporters), member 9.1.31E-051.3670695Up regulated1.694303
Verification of seven genes from the microarray using Real-time RT-PCR analysis in skeletal muscle.

Discussion

In the present study, we have identified genes involved in key metabolic signaling pathways in three tissue types in a non-human primate model, that were differentially expressed according to the birth weight of the animal. Importantly, this differential expression was across the normal birth weight spectrum and therefore likely to represent adaptive pathways that the fetuses uses to predict its postnatal environment. The identification of novel signaling pathways that appear to be regulated by the early life environment is a key step in designing future experimental paradigms to understand the association between birth weight and disease risk. Metabolic disease particularly, has been strongly with early life adversity [21,22]. Our data begin to shed light on the key signaling pathways that are vulnerable to subtle changes in the early life environment. The strength of our study, despite its small size, is that we have focused on infants whose growth was not experimentally manipulated but lay within normal birth weight range. Many experimental models have manipulated pregnancy in an effort to produce fetal growth restriction. Such studies have shown that offspring which are born growth restricted catch-up in growth with their normally nourished counterparts and in adulthood are obese, hypertensive, hyperinsulinemic, leptin resistant and display sedentary behavior [23-25]. Investigations into underlying mechanisms and the determination of gene expression levels that may explain these altered phenotypes have produced conflicting results [26-28] which may reflect variations in the model systems used and the gender of the animals used [28]. Taken together, although these studies have established the link between early life nutritional adversity to later pathophysiology, there are limitations in the interpretation of rodent studies in development as applied to humans. In the present study we aimed to study the molecular associates of growth variation within the normative range and exclude pathology. This is because the growing literature on developmental outcomes highlights that the importance of variation in risk is associated with non-pathological developmental environments. Accordingly we studied relatively small infants born between the 5th and 25th centile but excluded the smallest neonates, which may reflect obstetrical abnormalities. These infants were compared to infants in the middle of the normative range (50th-75th centile) and accordingly we excluded infants who may have had macrosomia as a result of the mother's being over-nourished by being maintained in captivity. Thus we are confident that we have excluded pathological influences and demonstrated that within the normative range patterns of gene expression may vary considerably with variable birth weights. Indeed we found a number of genes with more than a 10 fold shift in expression levels. There are important implications to this observation. Historically, experimental and epidemiological focus has been on the extremes of birth weight (either small for gestational age or large for gestational age) and there has been little focus within the normal birth weight range continuum. What is evident from the present study is that relatively small changes in the birth phenotype may be associated with profound changes in molecular physiology. In turn this also suggests the presence of highly evolved processes by which the fetus can adjust its development in response to subtle cues from mother [29]. The Cynomolgus, as in the human, has monotocous pregnancies with haemochorial placentae; they have omnivorous diets and monogastric digestion. They also share with humans the same progressive history of the metabolic syndrome [17]. We have identified alterations in the levels and expression patterns of a number of genes involved in different metabolic processes including cellular lipid metabolism, cellular biosynthesis, cellular macromolecule synthesis, cellular nitrogen metabolism, cellular carbohydrate metabolism, cellular catabolism, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism, biological adhesion and development.Recently, transcriptional profiling in rats subjected to gestational under nutrition was performed in young adult male rats where 249 genes were shown to be differentially expressed in the liver [28]. We compared the genes which are significantly altered in our array with those identified in the rat array study and have identified twelve similar or closely related genes from those identified in the rat: Tribbles homolog 2 (Trib2); 3-hydroxyanthanillate dioxygenase (Haao), transmembrane serine protease 6 (Tmmprss6); Thioredoxin domain containing10 (Txndc10); tralation initiation factor 4A3 (Eifa3); Ribosomal protein L31 (Rpl31); Danse 1-like 2 (Dnase1l2); Quinolate phosphoribosyl transferase (Qprt); general transcription factor IIa 2 (Gtf2a3); General transcription factor II H 3 [28]. Only four of these genes (Trib2, Trip10, EIF4A3 and Dnase1l2) were altered in the same direction in the livers of LBW macaques as in the rat array. We have also compared our observations with those identified from LBW term placentas by McCarthy and colleagues [30] and found similarities in expression changes in the genes Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioygense (PLOD2); Soluble interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP); Solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter) member3 (SLC2A3); Myosin V1(MYH6); Ribosomal protein S6(RPS6) and Latexin (LXN). The Tribbles homolog 2 (Trib2) is also increased in the LBW infants and suggests another possible way in way insulin/IGF-1 signalling might be impaired during development. Tribbles belongs to a family of kinase-like proteins and are reported to be negative regulators of Akt, the principle target of insulin signaling [31,32]. Studies using animal models such as rodents to understand the developmental origins of metabolic diseases have shown that epigenetic changes in genes correlates with expression changes including metabolic enzymes such as PEPCK, transcriptional factors such as PPARα which regulate fat metabolism and factors associated with insulin action (e.g. PI3 kinase, PKC-ζ), the key regulatory genes which are responsible for bringing these changes are not known [15,33]. One aim in our study was to identify whether there were shifts within the expression of key early regulators and from the array we have identified one such key regulatory gene the PAS Kinase (PASK), an evolutionarily conserved PAS domain containing serine/threonine kinase whose expression is altered as a result of adverse early developmental conditions. PAS domains are evolutionarily conserved and appear from archaea, bacteria to eukaryotes and are present in many signaling proteins where they act as signal sensor domain [34]. The PASK gene, whereby expression was up regulated in the LBW animals, has been shown to be a metabolic sensor based on mice knock-out studies; mice lacking PASK are resistant to high-fat induced obesity, hepatic steatosis and are resistant to insulin [35].

Conclusions

In summary, this paper has identified significant variation in gene expression in multiple tissues in primate newborns of different growth trajectories but within the normative range of birth size. Further detailed analyses may improve our understanding of how alterations in such genes due to adverse early life environment predisposes towards metabolic syndrome. These data give strength to the hypothesis that developmental plasticity operating within the normative range of birth weights can influence metabolic and other physiological systems in a way that might have later health consequences. It emphasizes that the concept of developmental programming need not involve pathological changes in growth trajectories to have molecular and presumably functional consequences.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

BSE, RK and PDG conceived the study. KC, DMS and MHV coordinated and collected the animal samples. BSE and SM undertook the molecular biology. BSE and PDG wrote the manuscript. BSE, KC, DMS, SM, MHV, RK and PDG reviewed/edited manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file 1

Genes which were differentially regulated between the ABW and LBW groups classified based on GO terms. Genes with a ≥ 1.5 fold change at least in one tissue with a p value of ≥ 0.5 identified from the array with the GO terms Click here for file
  34 in total

1.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Towards a new developmental synthesis: adaptive developmental plasticity and human disease.

Authors:  Peter D Gluckman; Mark A Hanson; Patrick Bateson; Alan S Beedle; Catherine M Law; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Konstantin V Anokhin; Pierre Bougnères; Giriraj Ratan Chandak; Partha Dasgupta; George Davey Smith; Peter T Ellison; Terrence E Forrester; Scott F Gilbert; Eva Jablonka; Hillard Kaplan; Andrew M Prentice; Stephen J Simpson; Ricardo Uauy; Mary Jane West-Eberhard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method.

Authors:  Thomas D Schmittgen; Kenneth J Livak
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Developmental origins of metabolic disease: life course and intergenerational perspectives.

Authors:  Keith M Godfrey; Peter D Gluckman; Mark A Hanson
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 12.015

5.  Dysregulation of the adipoinsular axis -- a mechanism for the pathogenesis of hyperleptinemia and adipogenic diabetes induced by fetal programming.

Authors:  M H Vickers; S Reddy; B A Ikenasio; B H Breier
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Maternal protein restriction with or without folic acid supplementation during pregnancy alters the hepatic transcriptome in adult male rats.

Authors:  Karen A Lillycrop; Joanne Rodford; Emma S Garratt; Joanne L Slater-Jefferies; Keith M Godfrey; Peter D Gluckman; Mark A Hanson; Graham C Burdge
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 7.  Nutrition, epigenetics, and developmental plasticity: implications for understanding human disease.

Authors:  Graham C Burdge; Karen A Lillycrop
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 8.  Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease.

Authors:  Peter D Gluckman; Mark A Hanson; Cyrus Cooper; Kent L Thornburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The effect of neonatal leptin treatment on postnatal weight gain in male rats is dependent on maternal nutritional status during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mark H Vickers; Peter D Gluckman; Alice H Coveny; Paul L Hofman; Wayne S Cutfield; Arieh Gertler; Bernhard H Breier; Mark Harris
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.736

10.  Transcriptional profiling of rats subjected to gestational undernourishment: implications for the developmental variations in metabolic traits.

Authors:  Tiffany J Morris; Mark Vickers; Peter Gluckman; Stewart Gilmour; Nabeel Affara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Baboons as a model to study genetics and epigenetics of human disease.

Authors:  Laura A Cox; Anthony G Comuzzie; Lorena M Havill; Genesio M Karere; Kimberly D Spradling; Michael C Mahaney; Peter W Nathanielsz; Daniel P Nicolella; Robert E Shade; Saroja Voruganti; John L VandeBerg
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

2.  Abruptio placentae in cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis): male bias.

Authors:  N Schlabritz-Loutsevitch; A Schenone; M Schenone; S Gupta; G Hubbard; J Zhang; G Mari; E Dick
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 0.667

Review 3.  Why primate models matter.

Authors:  Kimberley A Phillips; Karen L Bales; John P Capitanio; Alan Conley; Paul W Czoty; Bert A 't Hart; William D Hopkins; Shiu-Lok Hu; Lisa A Miller; Michael A Nader; Peter W Nathanielsz; Jeffrey Rogers; Carol A Shively; Mary Lou Voytko
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Recurrent abruptio placentae in a cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  N Schlabritz-Loutsevitch; G Hubbard; J Zhang; S Gupta; E Dick
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Identification of early indicators of altered metabolism in normal development using a rodent model system.

Authors:  Ashok Daniel Prabakaran; Jimsheena Valiyakath Karakkat; Ranjit Vijayan; Jisha Chalissery; Marwa F Ibrahim; Suneesh Kaimala; Ernest A Adeghate; Ahmed Hassan Al-Marzouqi; Suraiya Anjum Ansari; Eric Mensah-Brown; Bright Starling Emerald
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.758

6.  The metabolic sensor PASK is a histone 3 kinase that also regulates H3K4 methylation by associating with H3K4 MLL2 methyltransferase complex.

Authors:  Jimsheena V Karakkat; Suneesh Kaimala; Sreejisha P Sreedharan; Princy Jayaprakash; Ernest A Adeghate; Suraiya A Ansari; Ernesto Guccione; Eric P K Mensah-Brown; Bright Starling Emerald
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.