Literature DB >> 21993903

Engaged, embedded, enjoined: science and technology studies in the National Science Foundation.

Edward J Hackett1, Diana R Rhoten.   

Abstract

Engaged scholarship is an intellectual movement sweeping across higher education, not only in the social and behavioral sciences but also in fields of natural science and engineering. It is predicated on the idea that major advances in knowledge will transpire when scholars, while pursuing their research interests, also consider addressing the core problems confronting society. For a workable engaged agenda in science and technology studies, one that informs scholarship as well as shapes practice and policy, the traditional terms of engagement must be renegotiated to be more open and mutual than has historically characterized the nature of inquiry in this field. At the same time, it is essential to protect individual privacy and preserve government confidentiality. Yet there is a scientific possibility for and benefit to introducing more collaborative and deliberative research approaches between scholar and subject in ways that will not violate these first-order ethics. To make the case, this article discusses the possibilities and perils of engaged science and technology scholarship by drawing on our own recent experiences to conduct and apply STS research while embedded in the National Science Foundation. Brief accounts of these experiences reveal the opportunities as well as the challenges of engaged scholarship. They also provide lessons for those fellow travelers who might follow the authors to this or other like host organizations with ambitions of increasing fundamental knowledge about and applying research to the policies, programs, and decisions of the scientific enterprise.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993903     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9307-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  4 in total

1.  NSF deals with conflicts every day.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Environmental science: a testing experience.

Authors:  Amanda Haag
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Chance and consensus in peer review.

Authors:  S Cole; J R Cole; G A Simon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Freedom, visibility of consequences, and scientific innovation.

Authors:  G Gordon; S Marquis
Journal:  AJS       Date:  1966-09
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?

Authors:  Erik Fisher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Doing science, technology and society in the National Science Foundation : commentary on: "Engaged, embedded, enjoined: science and technology studies in the National Science Foundation".

Authors:  Michael E Gorman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Taking our own medicine: on an experiment in science communication.

Authors:  Maja Horst
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  An exploratory study to develop a practical ethical framework for reproductive health research.

Authors:  Tahmineh Farajkhoda; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Mahmoud Abbasi
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-01

5.  To Crowdfund Research, Scientists Must Build an Audience for Their Work.

Authors:  Jarrett E K Byrnes; Jai Ranganathan; Barbara L E Walker; Zen Faulkes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review.

Authors:  Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Tom Pape; Martin Utley; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 7.035

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.