Literature DB >> 28712148

Influence of kidney offer acceptance behavior on metrics of allocation efficiency.

Andrew Wey1, Nicholas Salkowski1, Bertram L Kasiske1,2, Ajay K Israni1,2,3, Jon J Snyder1,3.   

Abstract

We investigated associations of deceased donor kidney offer acceptance with likelihood of the kidney being discarded, cold ischemia time at transplant (CIT), and likelihood of the kidney being exported outside the donation service area (DSA). We used kidney offers from donors in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients July 1, 2015-June 30, 2016, and a stratified logistic regression to estimate odds ratios of acceptance for candidates wait-listed in a DSA. We estimated associations between these ratios and likelihood of discard or export and CIT at transplant. Approximately 0.50 kidneys were discarded per donor; lower DSA-specific offer acceptance ratios were associated with more discards (R=-0.20; P=0.006). For a median donor, the DSA with the highest acceptance ratio would place 0.12 more kidneys per donor than the DSA with the lowest ratio. Low acceptance ratios were associated with higher CIT (R=-0.23; P<0.001). For the median donor, CIT was 2.9 hours shorter for the DSA with the highest versus lowest acceptance ratio. Low acceptance ratios were associated with more exports (R=-0.43; P<0.001); the probability was 15% higher for a median donor in the DSA with the lowest versus highest acceptance ratio. Improving lower-than-expected offer acceptance would likely reduce discards, CIT, and exports. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cold ischemia time; deceased donor; kidney transplant; organ offers

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28712148      PMCID: PMC5689462          DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  16 in total

1.  Developing organ offer and acceptance measures: when 'good' organs are turned down.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; F B LaPorte; A M Rodgers; E C Roys; G Fant; A B Leichtman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Susan Leppke; Tabitha Leighton; David Zaun; Shu-Cheng Chen; Melissa Skeans; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.943

3.  New quality monitoring tools provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: CUSUM.

Authors:  J J Snyder; N Salkowski; D Zaun; S N Leppke; T Leighton; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Share 35 changes in center-level liver acceptance practices.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Matthew Levine; Seth Karp; Richard Gilroy; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  Liver transplant center variability in accepting organ offers and its impact on patient survival.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Benjamin French; James D Lewis; Frank I Scott; Ronac Mamtani; Richard Gilroy; Scott D Halpern; Peter L Abt
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome.

Authors:  H U Meier-Kriesche; F K Port; A O Ojo; S M Rudich; J A Hanson; D M Cibrik; A B Leichtman; B Kaplan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Survival benefit of primary deceased donor transplantation with high-KDPI kidneys.

Authors:  A B Massie; X Luo; E K H Chow; J L Alejo; N M Desai; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  The aggressive phenotype: center-level patterns in the utilization of suboptimal kidneys.

Authors:  J M Garonzik-Wang; N T James; K C Weatherspoon; N A Deshpande; J A Berger; E C Hall; R A Montgomery; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Changes in geographic disparity in kidney transplantation since the final rule.

Authors:  Ashley E Davis; Sanjay Mehrotra; Daniela P Ladner; Vikram Kilambi; John J Friedewald
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Association of Candidate Removals From the Kidney Transplant Waiting List and Center Performance Oversight.

Authors:  J D Schold; L D Buccini; E D Poggio; S M Flechner; D A Goldfarb
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  11 in total

1.  Offer acceptance practices and geographic variability in allocation model for end-stage liver disease at transplant.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Joshua Pyke; David P Schladt; Sommer E Gentry; Tim Weaver; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Variability in donor organ offer acceptance and lung transplantation survival.

Authors:  Michael S Mulvihill; Hui J Lee; Jeremy Weber; Ashley Y Choi; Morgan L Cox; Babatunde A Yerokun; Muath A Bishawi; Jacob Klapper; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Heart and lung organ offer acceptance practices of transplant programs are associated with waitlist mortality and organ yield.

Authors:  Andrew Wey; Maryam Valapour; Melissa A Skeans; Nicholas Salkowski; Monica Colvin; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Evaluation of Accepting Kidneys of Varying Quality for Transplantation or Expedited Placement With Decision Trees.

Authors:  Vikram Kilambi; Kevin Bui; Gordon B Hazen; John J Friedewald; Daniela P Ladner; Bruce Kaplan; Sanjay Mehrotra
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Seeking new answers to old questions about public reporting of transplant program performance in the United States.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew Wey; Nicholas Salkowski; David Zaun; Cory R Schaffhausen; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Prospective Validation of Prediction Model for Kidney Discard.

Authors:  Sheng Zhou; Allan B Massie; Courtenay M Holscher; Madeleine M Waldram; Tanveen Ishaque; Alvin G Thomas; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Allan B Massie; Rebecca Craig-Schapiro; Dorry L Segev; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Association of Dialysis Duration With Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation in the Setting of Long Cold Ischemia Time.

Authors:  Keisha Bonner; Gaurang Joshi; Rachel Seibert; Liise K Kayler
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-12-17

9.  A Simulation-Based Optimization Model to Study the Impact of Multiple-Region Listing and Information Sharing on Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Zahra Gharibi; Michael Hahsler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Transplant Center Variability in Organ Offer Acceptance and Mortality Among US Patients on the Heart Transplant Waitlist.

Authors:  Ashley Y Choi; Michael S Mulvihill; Hui-Jie Lee; Congwen Zhao; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Jacob N Schroder; Chetan B Patel; Christopher B Granger; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.