Literature DB >> 21988363

Visual working memory supports the inhibition of previously processed information: evidence from preview search.

Naseem Al-Aidroos1, Stephen M Emrich, Susanne Ferber, Jay Pratt.   

Abstract

In four experiments we assessed whether visual working memory (VWM) maintains a record of previously processed visual information, allowing old information to be inhibited, and new information to be prioritized. Specifically, we evaluated whether VWM contributes to the inhibition (i.e., visual marking) of previewed distractors in a preview search. We evaluated this proposal by testing three predictions. First, Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that preview inhibition is more effective when the number of previewed distractors is below VWM capacity than above; an effect that can only be observed at small preview set sizes (Experiment 2A) and when observers are allowed to move their eyes freely (Experiment 2B). Second, Experiment 3 shows that, when quantified as the number of inhibited distractors, the magnitude of the preview effect is stable across different search difficulties. Third, Experiment 4 demonstrates that individual differences in preview inhibition are correlated with individual differences in VWM capacity. These findings provide converging evidence that VWM supports the inhibition of previewed distractors. More generally, these findings demonstrate how VWM contributes to the efficiency of human visual information processing--VWM prioritizes new information by inhibiting old information from being reselected for attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21988363     DOI: 10.1037/a0025707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Visual short-term memory guides infants' visual attention.

Authors:  Samantha G Mitsven; Lisa M Cantrell; Steven J Luck; Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-04-25

2.  Competition Effects in Visual Cortex Between Emotional Distractors and a Primary Task in Remitted Depression.

Authors:  Mary L Woody; Vladimir Miskovic; Max Owens; Kiera M James; Cope Feurer; Effua E Sosoo; Brandon E Gibb
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-01-21

3.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.

Authors:  MaryAnn P Noonan; Nika Adamian; Alexandra Pike; Frida Printzlau; Ben M Crittenden; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.

Authors:  Blaire Dube; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-23

6.  A Drastic Change in Background Luminance or Motion Degrades the Preview Benefit.

Authors:  Takayuki Osugi; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-24

Review 7.  Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25

8.  Perceptual grouping constrains inhibition in time-based visual selection.

Authors:  Zorana Zupan; Derrick G Watson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Scene memory and spatial inhibition in visual search : A neural dynamic process model and new experimental evidence.

Authors:  Raul Grieben; Jan Tekülve; Stephan K U Zibner; Jonas Lins; Sebastian Schneegans; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.