Literature DB >> 21988203

Comparison of gene-specific DNA methylation patterns in equine induced pluripotent stem cell lines with cells derived from equine adult and fetal tissues.

Catherine H Hackett1, Line Greve, Kira D Novakofski, Lisa A Fortier.   

Abstract

Cellular pluripotency is associated with expression of the homeobox transcription factor genes NANOG, SOX2, and POU5F1 (OCT3/4 protein). Some reports suggest that mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) may express increased quantities of these genes, creating the possibility that MPCs are more "pluripotent" than other adult cell types. The objective of this study was to determine whether equine bone marrow-derived MPCs had gene expression or DNA methylation patterns that differed from either early fetal-derived or terminally differentiated adult cells. Specifically, this study compared DNA methylation of the NANOG and SOX2 promoter regions and concurrent gene expression of NANOG, SOX2, and POU5F1 in equine induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, fetal fibroblasts, fetal brain cells, adult chondrocytes, and MPCs. Results indicate that NANOG and POU5F1 were not detectable in appreciable quantities in tissues other than the equine iPS cell lines. Equine iPS cells expressed large quantities of all three genes examined. Significantly increased quantities of SOX2 were noted in iPS cells and both fetal-derived cell types compared with adult cells. MPCs and adult chondrocytes expressed equivalent, low quantities of SOX2. Further, NANOG and SOX2 expression inversely correlated with the DNA methylation pattern in the promoter region, such that as gene expression increased, DNA methylation decreased. The equine iPS cell lines examined demonstrated DNA methylation and gene expression patterns that were consistent with pluripotency features described in other species. Results do not support previous reports that NANOG, SOX2, and POU5F1 are poised for increased activity in MPCs compared with other adult cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21988203      PMCID: PMC3376462          DOI: 10.1089/scd.2011.0055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  59 in total

1.  Comment on " 'Stemness': transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells" and "a stem cell molecular signature".

Authors:  Alexei V Evsikov; Davor Solter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Isolation and characterization of the murine Nanog gene promoter.

Authors:  Da Yong Wu; Zhen Yao
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  A negative feedback loop of transcription factors that controls stem cell pluripotency and self-renewal.

Authors:  Guangjin Pan; Jun Li; Yali Zhou; Hui Zheng; Duanqing Pei
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Shinji Masui; Yuhki Nakatake; Yayoi Toyooka; Daisuke Shimosato; Rika Yagi; Kazue Takahashi; Hitoshi Okochi; Akihiko Okuda; Ryo Matoba; Alexei A Sharov; Minoru S H Ko; Hitoshi Niwa
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Sall4 is essential for stabilization, but not for pluripotency, of embryonic stem cells by repressing aberrant trophectoderm gene expression.

Authors:  Shunsuke Yuri; Sayoko Fujimura; Keisuke Nimura; Naoki Takeda; Yayoi Toyooka; Yu-Ichi Fujimura; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Kiyoe Ura; Haruhiko Koseki; Hitoshi Niwa; Ryuichi Nishinakamura
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.277

6.  Nanog binds to Smad1 and blocks bone morphogenetic protein-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Atsushi Suzuki; Ángel Raya; Yasuhiko Kawakami; Masanobu Morita; Takaaki Matsui; Kinichi Nakashima; Fred H Gage; Concepción Rodríguez-Esteban; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Stable CpG hypomethylation of adipogenic promoters in freshly isolated, cultured, and differentiated mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue.

Authors:  Agate Noer; Anita L Sørensen; Andrew C Boquest; Philippe Collas
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  A stem cell molecular signature.

Authors:  Natalia B Ivanova; John T Dimos; Christoph Schaniel; Jason A Hackney; Kateri A Moore; Ihor R Lemischka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs promote induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Robert L Judson; Joshua E Babiarz; Monica Venere; Robert Blelloch
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Bisulfite-based epityping on pooled genomic DNA provides an accurate estimate of average group DNA methylation.

Authors:  Sophia J Docherty; Oliver S P Davis; Claire M A Haworth; Robert Plomin; Jonathan Mill
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.954

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: Mechanisms, achievements and perspectives in farm animals.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Thirumala R Talluri; Taruna Anand; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 2.  Induced pluripotent stem cells from farm animals.

Authors:  Yue Su; Jiaqi Zhu; Saleh Salman; Young Tang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Significance of epigenetic landscape in cartilage regeneration from the cartilage development and pathology perspective.

Authors:  Jingting Li; James Ohliger; Ming Pei
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Current state of the opportunities for derivation of germ-like cells from pluripotent stem cells: are you a man, or a mouse?

Authors:  Rumena Petkova; Borislav Arabadjiev; Stoyan Chakarov; Roumen Pankov
Journal:  Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 1.632

5.  Allogeneic Stem Cells Alter Gene Expression and Improve Healing of Distal Limb Wounds in Horses.

Authors:  Jamie A Textor; Kaitlin C Clark; Naomi J Walker; Fabio A Aristizobal; Amir Kol; Sarah S LeJeune; Andrea Bledsoe; Arik Davidyan; Sarah N Gray; Laurie K Bohannon-Worsley; Kevin D Woolard; Dori L Borjesson
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  Generation and miRNA Characterization of Equine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Fetal and Adult Multipotent Tissues.

Authors:  Laís Vicari de Figueiredo Pessôa; Pedro Ratto Lisboa Pires; Maite Del Collado; Naira Caroline Godoy Pieri; Kaiana Recchia; Aline Fernanda Souza; Felipe Perecin; Juliano Coelho da Silveira; André Furugen Cesar de Andrade; Carlos Eduardo Ambrosio; Fabiana Fernandes Bressan; Flavio Vieira Meirelles
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 7.  Perspectives of pluripotent stem cells in livestock.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Thirumala R Talluri; Naresh L Selokar; Iqbal Hyder; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Derivation and characterization of induced pluripotent stem cells from equine fibroblasts.

Authors:  Amandine Breton; Ruchi Sharma; Andrea Catalina Diaz; Alea Gillian Parham; Audrey Graham; Claire Neil; Christopher Bruce Whitelaw; Elspeth Milne; Francesc Xavier Donadeu
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.272

9.  Epigenetic Changes in Equine Embryos after Short-Term Storage at Different Temperatures.

Authors:  Gustavo D A Gastal; Dragos Scarlet; Maria Melchert; Reinhard Ertl; Christine Aurich
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.