Literature DB >> 17654548

Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 function prediction category.

Gonzalo López1, Ana Rojas, Michael Tress, Alfonso Valencia.   

Abstract

Here we present a full overview of the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP7) function prediction category. Predictions were submitted for Gene Ontology molecular function terms, Enzyme Commission numbers, and ligand binding site residues. The first two categories were difficult to assess because very little new functional information becomes available after the experiment. The majority of the known Gene Ontology terms and all the Enzyme Commission numbers were available a priori to predictors before the experiment, so prediction for these two categories was not blind. Nevertheless, for Gene Ontology terms we were able to demonstrate that some groups made better predictions than others. In the binding residue category, the predictors did not know in advance which ligands were bound and therefore blind evaluation was possible, but there were disappointingly few predictions in this category. After CASP 6 and 7 the need to organize a more effective blind function prediction category is obvious, even if it means focusing on binding site prediction as the only category that can be truly assessed in the CASP spirit. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17654548     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  24 in total

1.  Structure- and sequence-based function prediction for non-homologous proteins.

Authors:  Lee Sael; Meghana Chitale; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-01-22

2.  ESG: extended similarity group method for automated protein function prediction.

Authors:  Meghana Chitale; Troy Hawkins; Changsoon Park; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Assessment of ligand binding site predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Tiziano Gallo Cassarino; Lorenza Bordoli; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

4.  Prediction of ligand binding sites using homologous structures and conservation at CASP8.

Authors:  Mark N Wass; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

5.  Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Jürgen Haas; Tiziano Gallo Cassarino; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-11

6.  GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Woong-Hee Shin; Myeong Sup Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The PFP and ESG protein function prediction methods in 2014: effect of database updates and ensemble approaches.

Authors:  Ishita K Khan; Qing Wei; Samuel Chapman; Dukka B Kc; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures.

Authors:  Mark N Wass; Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Functional enrichment analyses and construction of functional similarity networks with high confidence function prediction by PFP.

Authors:  Troy Hawkins; Meghana Chitale; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction-Round VII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Burkhard Rost; Tim Hubbard; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.