Literature DB >> 21986872

Volumetric classification of pituitary macroadenomas predicts outcome and morbidity following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery.

Christoph P Hofstetter1, Michael J Nanaszko, Lynn L Mubita, John Tsiouris, Vijay K Anand, Theodore H Schwartz.   

Abstract

Endoscopy in combination with extended approaches allow for resection of large pituitary adenomas via a transsphenoidal route. The objective of the current study was to determine a volumetric threshold for lesions with high perioperative morbidity and high rate of subtotal resection following endonasal endoscopic surgery. Thus, we analyzed a prospectively collected database of 71 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches for macroadenomas (diameter >1 cm). Extend of resection (EOR) was calculated based on volumetric analysis of pre-and post-operative contrast-enhanced MRI. Average EOR was 97.8% and a gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 76.1% of all patients. GTR was accomplished in 92.0% versus 38.1% of adenomas either without or with CS invasion, respectively. Likewise, GTR was accomplished in 90.2% versus 40.0% of lesions less than or greater then 10 cm(3) respectively. However, even if only subtotal resection was achieved, 90.3% of tumor volume was removed. At 17 months follow-up, visual field defects improved in 80.8% of patients. Complications included permanent diabetes insipidus (5 patients), panhypopituitarism (4 patients), injury to the ophthalmic artery (1 patient) and CSF leak (1 patient). On multivariate logistic regression, two factors negatively predicted GTR: invasion of the CS and volume greater than 10 cm(3). A 10 cm(3) threshold was a stronger predictor of EOR and complication risk than diameter-based measurements. A volume greater than 10 cm(3) and CS invasion may help to identify pituitary lesions associated with a higher likelihood of subtotal resection and post-operative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21986872     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-011-0350-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  66 in total

1.  Endoscopic transsphenoidal approach: adaptability of the procedure to different sellar lesions.

Authors:  Enrico de Divitiis; Paolo Cappabianca; Luigi Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Follow-up studies on 105 cases of verified chromophobe and acidophile pituitary adenomata after treatment by transfrontal operation and x-ray irradiation.

Authors:  S B HEIMBACH
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1959       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Transsphenoidal endoscopic approach in the treatment of Rathke's cleft cyst.

Authors:  Giorgio Frank; Vittorio Sciarretta; Diego Mazzatenta; Giovanni Farneti; Giovanni Carlo Modugno; Ernesto Pasquini
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the suprasellar cistern.

Authors:  Theodore H Schwartz; Vijay K Anand
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  2007

5.  Extended transsphenoidal approach with submucosal posterior ethmoidectomy for parasellar tumors. Technical note.

Authors:  M Kitano; M Taneda
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  The endoscopic approach to the pituitary gland.

Authors:  C F Wurster; D E Smith
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-06

7.  A decade of pituitary microsurgery. The Herbert Olivecrona lecture.

Authors:  C B Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Giant pituitary adenomas: clinical characteristics and surgical results.

Authors:  J Garibi; I Pomposo; G Villar; S Gaztambide
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap.

Authors:  Gustavo Hadad; Luis Bassagasteguy; Ricardo L Carrau; Juan C Mataza; Amin Kassam; Carl H Snyderman; Arlan Mintz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  H W Pia; E Grote; G Hildebrandt
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.042

View more
  23 in total

1.  Surgical Treatment of Cavernous Sinus Lesion in Patients with Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas via the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach.

Authors:  Masahiro Toda; Kenzo Kosugi; Hiroyuki Ozawa; Kaoru Ogawa; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-07-16

Review 2.  Resection of pituitary tumors: endoscopic versus microscopic.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Walid I Essayed; Aaron Cohen-Gadol; Gabriel Zada; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Utility of early postoperative high-resolution volumetric magnetic resonance imaging after transsphenoidal pituitary tumor surgery.

Authors:  Kunal S Patel; Jacob Kazam; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Operative Strategies to Minimize Complications Following Resection of Pituitary Macroadenomas.

Authors:  Jayesh P Thawani; Ashwin G Ramayya; Jared M Pisapia; Kalil G Abdullah; John Y-K Lee; M Sean Grady
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  Long-Term Outcomes of Pituitary Gland Preservation in Pituitary Macroadenoma Apoplexy: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  John Robert Souter; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Kurt Grahnke; Ewa Borys; Chirag Patel; Anand V Germanwala
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-11-11

6.  Thin-Slice Pituitary MRI with Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Preoperative Prediction of Cavernous Sinus Invasion by Pituitary Adenoma: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  M Kim; H S Kim; J E Park; S Y Park; Y-H Kim; S J Kim; J Lee; M R Lebel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Post-operative diabetes insipidus after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.

Authors:  Matthew Schreckinger; Blake Walker; Jordan Knepper; Mark Hornyak; David Hong; Jung-Min Kim; Adam Folbe; Murali Guthikonda; Sandeep Mittal; Nicholas J Szerlip
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Three-dimensional volumetric measurements in defining endoscope-guided giant adenoma surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad Omar Chohan; Ariana M Levin; Ranjodh Singh; Zhiping Zhou; Carlos L Green; Jacob J Kazam; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Comparative study of complications after primary and revision transsphenoidal endoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Leandro Custódio do Amaral; Baltazar Leão Reis; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Thamires Marx da Silva Santos; Alexandre Varella Giannetti
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 10.  Impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging on gross total resection, extent of resection, and residual tumor volume in pituitary surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor E Staartjes; Alex Togni-Pogliorini; Vittorio Stumpo; Carlo Serra; Luca Regli
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.