Literature DB >> 23242859

Post-operative diabetes insipidus after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.

Matthew Schreckinger1, Blake Walker, Jordan Knepper, Mark Hornyak, David Hong, Jung-Min Kim, Adam Folbe, Murali Guthikonda, Sandeep Mittal, Nicholas J Szerlip.   

Abstract

Diabetes insipidus (DI) after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) can lead to increased morbidity, longer hospital stays, and increased medication requirements. Predicting which patients are at high risk for developing DI can help direct services to ensure adequate care and follow-up. The objective of this study was to review our institution's experience with ETSS and determine which clinical/laboratory variables are associated with DI in this patient population. The authors wanted to see if there was an easily determined single value that would help predict which patients develop DI. This represents the largest North American series of this type. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had undergone ETSS for resection of sellar and parasellar pathology between 2006 and 2011. We examined patient and tumor characteristics and their relationship to postoperative DI. Out of 172 endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries, there were 15 cases of transient DI (8.7%) and 14 cases of permanent DI (8.1%). Statistically significant predictors of postoperative DI (p < 0.05) included tumor volume and histopathology (Rathke's cleft cyst and craniopharyngioma). Significant indicators of development of DI were postoperative serum sodium, preoperative to postoperative change in sodium level, and urine output prior to administration of 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin. An increase in serum sodium of ≥2.5 mmol/L is a positive marker of development of DI with 80% specificity, and a postoperative serum sodium of ≥145 mmol/L is a positive indicator with 98% specificity. Identifying perioperative risk factors and objective indicators of DI after ETSS will help physicians care for patients postoperatively. In this large series, we demonstrated that there were multiple perioperative risk factors for the development of DI. These findings, which are consistent with other reports from microscopic surgical series, will help identify patients at risk for diabetes insipidus, aid in planning treatment algorithms, and increase vigilance in high risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23242859     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-012-0453-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  25 in total

1.  DDAVP use in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  J M Sheehan; J P Sheehan; G L Douds; R B Page
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Postoperative diabetes insipidus.

Authors:  J Seckl; D Dunger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-07

3.  A prospective study of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: presentation, management, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Lukui Chen; William L White; Robert F Spetzler; Bainan Xu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Diabetes insipidus in children: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Tim Cheetham; Peter H Baylis
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Transsphenoidal surgery in patients with acromegaly: operative strategies for overcoming technically challenging anatomical variations.

Authors:  Gabriel Zada; Luigi M Cavallo; Felice Esposito; Julio Cesar Fernandez-Jimenez; Anastasia Tasiou; Michelangelo De Angelis; Tullio Cafiero; Paolo Cappabianca; Edward R Laws
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 6.  Diabetes insipidus: diagnosis and treatment of a complex disease.

Authors:  Amgad N Makaryus; Samy I McFarlane
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.321

7.  Predictors of diabetes insipidus after transsphenoidal surgery: a review of 881 patients.

Authors:  Edward C Nemergut; Zhiyi Zuo; John A Jane; Edward R Laws
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Hydrocortisone dose and postoperative diabetes insipidus in patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  S Rajaratnam; M S Seshadri; M J Chandy; V Rajshekhar
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: endocrinological results.

Authors:  J Honegger; M Buchfelder; R Fahlbusch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Endoscopic approach for pituitary surgery improves rhinologic outcomes.

Authors:  Scott M Graham; Tim A Iseli; Lucy H Karnell; John D Clinger; Patrick W Hitchon; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  The Treatment of Cushing's Disease.

Authors:  Rosario Pivonello; Monica De Leo; Alessia Cozzolino; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia: Disorders of Water Balance in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Mendel Castle-Kirszbaum; Mervyn Kyi; Christopher Wright; Tony Goldschlager; R Andrew Danks; W Geoffrey Parkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Complication Rates after Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for ACTH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: A Comparative Analysis with GH and Nonfunctioning Adenomas.

Authors:  Juan Á Aibar-Durán; Michael Oladotun-Anka; Carlos Asencio-Cortés; Elena Valassi; Susan Webb; Juan R Gras-Cabrerizo; Joan Monserrat-Gili; Pere Tresserras Ribó; Fernando Muñoz-Hernández
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-03-02

4.  Peel-off resection of the pituitary gland for functional pituitary adenomas: pathological significance and impact on pituitary function.

Authors:  Yuichi Nagata; Kazuhito Takeuchi; Taiki Yamamoto; Takayuki Ishikawa; Teppei Kawabata; Yoshie Shimoyama; Naoko Inoshita; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Immediate and Delayed Complications Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew R Naunheim; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Derrick T Lin; Benjamin S Bleier; Eric H Holbrook; William T Curry; Stacey T Gray
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-05-15

6.  Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach for Apoplectic Pituitary Tumor: Surgical Outcomes and Complications in 45 Patients.

Authors:  Rucai Zhan; Xueen Li; Xingang Li
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-08-20

7.  Diabetes Insipidus following Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma.

Authors:  Abdulrazag M Ajlan; Sarah Bin Abdulqader; Achal S Achrol; Yousef Aljamaan; Abdullah H Feroze; Laurence Katznelson; Griffith R Harsh
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-08-03

8.  Is it possible to predict the development of diabetes insipidus after pituitary surgery? Study of 241 endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgeries.

Authors:  M Araujo-Castro; F Mariño-Sánchez; A Acitores Cancela; A García Fernández; S García Duque; V Rodríguez Berrocal
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Predictive factors of postoperative diabetes insipidus in 333 patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for non-functioning pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kinoshita; Akira Taguchi; Atsushi Tominaga; Tetsuhiko Sakoguchi; Kazunori Arita; Fumiyuki Yamasaki
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  Diabetes insipidus after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: multicenter experience and development of the SALT score.

Authors:  Mendel Castle-Kirszbaum; Peter Fuller; Yi Yuen Wang; James King; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.