Literature DB >> 28321384

Operative Strategies to Minimize Complications Following Resection of Pituitary Macroadenomas.

Jayesh P Thawani1, Ashwin G Ramayya2, Jared M Pisapia2, Kalil G Abdullah2, John Y-K Lee2, M Sean Grady2.   

Abstract

Introduction We sought to identify factors associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and morbidity in patients undergoing resection of pituitary macroadenomas. Methods We reviewed records of 203 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal resection of a pituitary macroadenoma (mean age = 55.7 [16-88]) years, volume = 11.3 (1.0-134.3) cm3. Complete resection was possible in 60/29.6% patients. Mean follow-up was 575 days. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using MATLAB. Results Mean LOS was 4.67 (1-66) days and was associated with CSF leak (p = 0.025), lumbar drain placement (p = 0.041; n = 8/3.9% intraoperative, n = 20/9.9% postoperative), and any infection (p = 0.066). Age, diabetes insipidus (n = 17/8.37%), and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (n = 12/5.9%) were not associated with increased LOS (p > 0.2). Postoperative CSF leak in the hospital (n = 21/10.3%) was associated with intraoperative CSF leak (p = 0.002; n = 82/40.4%) and complete resection (p = 0.012). There was no significant association (p > 0.1) between postoperative CSF leak in the hospital following surgery and the use of a fat graft (n = 61/30.1%), nasoseptal flap (155/76.4%), or perioperative lumbar drain placement (n = 8/3.94%). Conclusion Complete resection is associated with increased risk of CSF leak and LOS. Operative strategies including placement of fat graft, nasoseptal flap, or intraoperative lumbar drain placement may have limited value in reducing the risk of postoperative CSF leak.

Entities:  

Keywords:  length of stay; pituitary macroadenoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 28321384      PMCID: PMC5357219          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of endoscopic versus sublabial pituitary surgery.

Authors:  Timothy R DeKlotz; Stanley H Chia; Wenxin Lu; Kepher H Makambi; Edward Aulisi; Ziad Deeb
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Giant pituitary adenomas: surgical outcomes of 50 cases operated on by the endonasal endoscopic approach.

Authors:  Jackson A Gondim; João Paulo C Almeida; Lucas Alverne F Albuquerque; Erika F Gomes; Michele Schops
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenoma: surgical complications in 301 patients.

Authors:  Jackson A Gondim; Joao Paulo C Almeida; Lucas Alverne F Albuquerque; Michele Schops; Erika Gomes; Tania Ferraz; Wladia Sobreira; Meissa T Kretzmann
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Frequent occurrence of the triphasic response (diabetes insipidus/hyponatremia/diabetes insipidus) after surgery for craniopharyngioma in childhood.

Authors:  Martijn J J Finken; Nitash Zwaveling-Soonawala; Marie J E Walenkamp; Thomas Vulsma; A S Paul van Trotsenburg; Joost Rotteveel
Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.852

Review 5.  Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Ricardo J Komotar; Robert M Starke; Daniel M S Raper; Vijay K Anand; Theodore H Schwartz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Retrospective analysis of a concurrent series of microscopic versus endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries for Knosp Grades 0-2 nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas at a single institution.

Authors:  Robert Dallapiazza; Aaron E Bond; Yuval Grober; Robert G Louis; Spencer C Payne; Edward H Oldfield; John A Jane
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal removal of recurrent and regrowing pituitary adenomas: experience on a 59-patient series.

Authors:  Luigi M Cavallo; Domenico Solari; Anastasia Tasiou; Felice Esposito; Michelangelo de Angelis; Alfonso Iodice D'Enza; Paolo Cappabianca
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Endoscopic endonasal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Maria Koutourousiou; Paul A Gardner; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Alessandro Paluzzi; Eric W Wang; Carl H Snyderman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Risk of meningitis with cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

Authors:  Anu Daudia; Debabrata Biswas; Nick S Jones
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Morbidity of repeat transsphenoidal surgery assessed in more than 1000 operations.

Authors:  Arman Jahangiri; Jeffrey Wagner; Sung Won Han; Corinna C Zygourakis; Seunggu J Han; Mai T Tran; Liane M Miller; Maxwell W Tom; Sandeep Kunwar; Lewis S Blevins; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  12 in total

1.  Utility of intraoperative ultrasonography for resection of pituitary adenomas: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshareef; Stephen Lowe; Yeonhee Park; Bruce Frankel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Near-Infrared Optical Contrast of Skull Base Tumors During Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery.

Authors:  Jun W Jeon; Steve S Cho; Shayoni Nag; Love Buch; John Pierce; YouRong S Su; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; Jason G Newman; Sunil Singhal; John Y K Lee
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Surgical Experience in Prevention of Postoperative CSF Leaks Using Abdominal Fat Grafts in Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Stephen Ahn; Jae-Sung Park; Do H Kim; Sung W Kim; Sin-Soo Jeun
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-20

4.  Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Dorismond; Griffin D Santarelli; Brian D Thorp; Adam J Kimple; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-07

5.  Folate Receptor Near-Infrared Optical Imaging Provides Sensitive and Specific Intraoperative Visualization of Nonfunctional Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Steve S Cho; Ryan Zeh; John T Pierce; Jun Jeon; MacLean Nasrallah; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; Jason G Newman; Caitlin White; Julia Kharlip; Peter Snyder; Philip Low; Sunil Singhal; M Sean Grady; John Y K Lee
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 6.  Preoperative risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel J Lobatto; Friso de Vries; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Alberto M Pereira; Wilco C Peul; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Nienke R Biermasz; Wouter R van Furth
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Avoiding Complications in Endoscopic Trans-Sphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma: A Beginner's Perspective.

Authors:  Pawan Goyal; Aditya Gupta; Sanjeev Srivastava; Shilpi Modi
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-12-21

8.  Cephalocaudal tumor diameter is a predictor of diabetes insipidus after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for non-functioning pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Hyongmin Oh; Hyeon Cheun; Yoon Jung Kim; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Ho Kang; Hyung-Chul Lee; Hee-Pyoung Park; Jung Hee Kim; Yong Hwy Kim
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Challenges, Learning Curve, and Safety of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of Sellar-Suprasellar Lesions in a Community Hospital.

Authors:  Mohamed A R Soliman; Sydney Eaton; Elise Quint; Abdullah F Alkhamees; Saba Shahab; Avalon O'Connor; Erika Haberfellner; Jacob Im; Abdurrahim A Elashaal; Francis Ling; Mustafa Elbreki; Tommy Dang; Dante J Morassutti; Abdalla Shamisa
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 10.  Postoperative diabetes insipidus: how to define and grade this complication?

Authors:  Friso de Vries; Daniel J Lobatto; Marco J T Verstegen; Wouter R van Furth; Alberto M Pereira; Nienke R Biermasz
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.