Literature DB >> 21984249

Biosecurity-based interventions and strategies to reduce Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms.

D G Newell1, K T Elvers, D Dopfer, I Hansson, P Jones, S James, J Gittins, N J Stern, R Davies, I Connerton, D Pearson, G Salvat, V M Allen.   

Abstract

The prevention and control of Campylobacter colonization of poultry flocks are important public health strategies for the control of human campylobacteriosis. A critical review of the literature on interventions to control Campylobacter in poultry on farms was undertaken using a systematic approach. Although the focus of the review was on aspects appropriate to the United Kingdom poultry industry, the research reviewed was gathered from worldwide literature. Multiple electronic databases were employed to search the literature, in any language, from 1980 to September 2008. A primary set of 4,316 references was identified and scanned, using specific agreed-upon criteria, to select relevant references related to biosecurity-based interventions. The final library comprised 173 references. Identification of the sources of Campylobacter in poultry flocks was required to inform the development of targeted interventions to disrupt transmission routes. The approach used generally involved risk factor-based surveys related to culture-positive or -negative flocks, usually combined with a structured questionnaire. In addition, some studies, either in combination or independently, undertook intervention trials. Many of these studies were compromised by poor design, sampling, and statistical analysis. The evidence for each potential source and route of transmission on the poultry farm was reviewed critically, and the options for intervention were considered. The review concluded that, in most instances, biosecurity on conventional broiler farms can be enhanced and this should contribute to the reduction of flock colonization. However, complementary, non-biosecurity-based approaches will also be required in the future to maximize the reduction of Campylobacter-positive flocks at the farm level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21984249      PMCID: PMC3233073          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01090-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  77 in total

1.  Role of batch depletion of broiler houses on the occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in chicken flocks.

Authors:  B Hald; E Rattenborg; M Madsen
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.858

2.  Reduction of campylobacter infections in broiler flocks by application of hygiene measures.

Authors:  A W van de Giessen; J J Tilburg; W S Ritmeester; J van der Plas
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Epidemiological study on risk factors and risk reducing measures for campylobacter infections in Dutch broiler flocks.

Authors:  A W van de Giessen; B P Bloemberg; W S Ritmeester; J J Tilburg
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Dynamics of Campylobacter spp. spread investigated in 14 broiler flocks in Switzerland.

Authors:  M Ring; M A Zychowska; R Stephan
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.577

5.  Epidemiological investigation of risk factors for campylobacter colonization in Norwegian broiler flocks.

Authors:  G Kapperud; E Skjerve; L Vik; K Hauge; A Lysaker; I Aalmen; S M Ostroff; M Potter
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Dose response for infectivity of several strains of Campylobacter jejuni in chickens.

Authors:  Lailai Chen; Helena Geys; Shaun Cawthraw; Arie Havelaar; Peter Teunis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Serotype and genotype diversity and hatchery transmission of Campylobacter jejuni in commercial poultry flocks.

Authors:  L Petersen; E M Nielsen; S L On
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Investigation of the presence and protective effects of maternal antibodies against Campylobacter jejuni in chickens.

Authors:  S A Cawthraw; D G Newell
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.577

9.  Natural campylobacter colonization in chickens raised under different environmental conditions.

Authors:  G B Lindblom; E Sjörgren; B Kaijser
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1986-06

10.  Use of fly screens to reduce Campylobacter spp. introduction in broiler houses.

Authors:  Birthe Hald; Helle M Sommer; Henrik Skovgård
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  57 in total

1.  On-farm Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in commercial broiler chickens: Re-used bedding does not influence Campylobacter emergence and levels across sequential farming cycles.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; W Estella; H Rodrigues; D G Mayer; C Weyand; T Tran; A Onysk; I Diallo
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Management Strategies for Prevention of Campylobacter Infections Through the Poultry Food Chain: A European Perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Alter; Felix Reich
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection.

Authors:  Nadeem O Kaakoush; Natalia Castaño-Rodríguez; Hazel M Mitchell; Si Ming Man
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Enumeration of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in environmental farm samples and processing plant carcass rinses from commercial broiler chicken flocks.

Authors:  Roy D Berghaus; Stephan G Thayer; Bibiana F Law; Rita M Mild; Charles L Hofacre; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Proximity to Other Commercial Turkey Farms Affects Colonization Onset, Genotypes, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter spp. in Turkeys: Suggestive Evidence from a Paired-Farm Model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Niedermeyer; Lynde Ring; William G Miller; Seiche Genger; Christina Parr Lindsey; Jason Osborne; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Effect of bacteriophage application on Campylobacter jejuni loads in commercial broiler flocks.

Authors:  Sophie Kittler; Samuel Fischer; Amir Abdulmawjood; Gerhard Glünder; Günter Klein
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  The Data Behind Risk Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Infections.

Authors:  Racem Ben Romdhane; Roswitha Merle
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 8.  Phage Biocontrol of Campylobacter: A One Health Approach.

Authors:  Sophie Kittler; Severin Steffan; Elisa Peh; Madeleine Plötz
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Campylobacter colonization and proliferation in the broiler chicken upon natural field challenge is not affected by the bird growth rate or breed.

Authors:  Fraser J Gormley; Richard A Bailey; Kellie A Watson; Jim McAdam; Santiago Avendaño; William A Stanley; Alfons N M Koerhuis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Campylobacter and Arcobacter species in food-producing animals: prevalence at primary production and during slaughter.

Authors:  Nompumelelo Shange; Pieter Gouws; Louwrens C Hoffman
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.