Literature DB >> 25172857

Campylobacter colonization and proliferation in the broiler chicken upon natural field challenge is not affected by the bird growth rate or breed.

Fraser J Gormley1, Richard A Bailey2, Kellie A Watson2, Jim McAdam2, Santiago Avendaño2, William A Stanley2, Alfons N M Koerhuis2.   

Abstract

The zoonotic association between Campylobacter bacteria in poultry and humans has been characterized by decades of research which has attempted to elucidate the epidemiology of this complex relationship and to reduce carriage within poultry. While much work has focused on the mechanisms facilitating its success in contaminating chicken flocks (and other animal hosts), it remains difficult to consistently exclude Campylobacter under field conditions. Within the United Kingdom poultry industry, various bird genotypes with widely varying growth rates are available to meet market needs and consumer preferences. However, little is known about whether any differences in Campylobacter carriage exist across this modern broiler range. The aim of this study was to establish if a relationship exists between growth rate or breed and cecal Campylobacter concentration after natural commercial flock Campylobacter challenge. In one investigation, four pure line genotypes of various growth rates were grown together, while in the second, eight different commercial broiler genotypes were grown individually. In both studies, the Campylobacter concentration was measured in the ceca at 42 days of age, revealing no significant difference in cecal load between birds of different genotypes both in mixed- and single-genotype pens. This is important from a public health perspective and suggests that other underlying reasons beyond genotype are likely to control and affect Campylobacter colonization within chickens. Further studies to gain a better understanding of colonization dynamics and subsequent proliferation are needed, as are novel approaches to reduce the burden in poultry.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172857      PMCID: PMC4249045          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02162-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  Campylobacter infection has different outcomes in fast- and slow-growing broiler chickens.

Authors:  L K Williams; L C Sait; E K Trantham; T A Cogan; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.577

2.  Increased colonization potential of Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 after passage through chickens and its implication on the rate of transmission within flocks.

Authors:  S A Cawthraw; T M Wassenaar; R Ayling; D G Newell
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Colonization of chicks by motility mutants of Campylobacter jejuni demonstrates the importance of flagellin A expression.

Authors:  T M Wassenaar; B A van der Zeijst; R Ayling; D G Newell
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1993-06

4.  Host genes affect intestinal colonisation of newly hatched chickens by Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Yvonne Boyd; Eifion G Herbert; Kerrie L Marston; Michael A Jones; Paul A Barrow
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  Campylobacter jejuni-induced cytokine responses in avian cells.

Authors:  Chris K Smith; Pete Kaiser; Lisa Rothwell; Tom Humphrey; Paul A Barrow; Michael A Jones
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Lack of evidence for vertical transmission of Campylobacter spp. in chickens.

Authors:  Kenneth A Callicott; Vala Friethriksdóttir; Jarle Reiersen; Ruff Lowman; Jean-Robert Bisaillon; Eggert Gunnarsson; Eva Berndtson; Kelli L Hiett; David S Needleman; Norman J Stern
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  A longitudinal study of campylobacter infection of broiler flocks in Great Britain.

Authors:  S J Evans; A R Sayers
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Effects of feed particle size and feed form on survival of Salmonella typhimurium in the alimentary tract and cecal S. typhimurium reduction in growing broilers.

Authors:  D S Huang; D F Li; J J Xing; Y X Ma; Z J Li; S Q Lv
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Role of infection due to Campylobacter jejuni in the initiation of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  B Mishu; M J Blaser
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Campylobacter jejuni in broilers: the role of vertical transmission.

Authors:  S Shanker; A Lee; T C Sorrell
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1986-04
View more
  12 in total

1.  On-farm Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in commercial broiler chickens: Re-used bedding does not influence Campylobacter emergence and levels across sequential farming cycles.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; W Estella; H Rodrigues; D G Mayer; C Weyand; T Tran; A Onysk; I Diallo
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Campylobacter and Arcobacter species in food-producing animals: prevalence at primary production and during slaughter.

Authors:  Nompumelelo Shange; Pieter Gouws; Louwrens C Hoffman
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Effect of Feed Additives on Productivity and Campylobacter spp. Loads in Broilers Reared under Free Range Conditions.

Authors:  Muriel Guyard-Nicodème; Adeline Huneau-Salaün; Fabrizio A Tatone; Fabien Skiba; Maxime Quentin; Ségolène Quesne; Typhaine Poezevara; Marianne Chemaly
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli autotransporter genes exhibit lineage-associated distribution and decay.

Authors:  Jai W Mehat; Roberto M La Ragione; Arnoud H M van Vliet
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Prebiotic Driven Increases in IL-17A Do Not Prevent Campylobacter jejuni Colonization of Chickens.

Authors:  Geraldine M Flaujac Lafontaine; Philip J Richards; Phillippa L Connerton; Peter M O'Kane; Nacheervan M Ghaffar; Nicola J Cummings; Neville M Fish; Ian F Connerton
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Campylobacter sp.: Pathogenicity factors and prevention methods-new molecular targets for innovative antivirulence drugs?

Authors:  Vanessa Kreling; Franco H Falcone; Corinna Kehrenberg; Andreas Hensel
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Quantitative trait loci and transcriptome signatures associated with avian heritable resistance to Campylobacter.

Authors:  Androniki Psifidi; Andreas Kranis; Lisa M Rothwell; Abi Bremner; Kay Russell; Diego Robledo; Stephen J Bush; Mark Fife; Paul M Hocking; Georgios Banos; David A Hume; Jim Kaufman; Richard A Bailey; Santiago Avendano; Kellie A Watson; Pete Kaiser; Mark P Stevens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The genomic architecture of resistance to Campylobacter jejuni intestinal colonisation in chickens.

Authors:  A Psifidi; M Fife; J Howell; O Matika; P M van Diemen; R Kuo; J Smith; P M Hocking; N Salmon; M A Jones; D A Hume; G Banos; M P Stevens; P Kaiser
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The effect of the timing of exposure to Campylobacter jejuni on the gut microbiome and inflammatory responses of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Phillippa L Connerton; Philip J Richards; Geraldine M Lafontaine; Peter M O'Kane; Nacheervan Ghaffar; Nicola J Cummings; Darren L Smith; Neville M Fish; Ian F Connerton
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 10.  Revisiting Campylobacter jejuni Virulence and Fitness Factors: Role in Sensing, Adapting, and Competing.

Authors:  Abdi Elmi; Fauzy Nasher; Nick Dorrell; Brendan Wren; Ozan Gundogdu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.