Literature DB >> 21982746

Sexual conflict in viscous populations: the effect of the timing of dispersal.

Geoff Wild1, Tommaso Pizzari, Stuart A West.   

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increasing theoretical and empirical examination of how sexual conflict can arise between males and females. However, much this work has implicitly assumed that interactions take place in panmictic populations with complete dispersal, where interactions are between unrelated individuals. Here, we examine the consequences of limited dispersal and population structure for the evolution of a male phenotype that is associated with the males pre- and post-copulatory reproductive success, using an inclusive-fitness based analysis applied to group-structured populations. We show that: (i) the sex-specific timing of the dispersal phase of the life cycle can drive the evolution of sexual conflict; (ii) the inclusive fitness of a female in this conflict is determined solely by direct (i.e. personal) effects on its own competitive ability. Our analysis is supported by results from individual-based simulations of multi-level selection. Our results support the suggestion that kin selection can influence the evolution of sexual conflict, but reveal that such a role might be more complex than previously appreciated when sex-specific life histories are taken into consideration. We discuss the implications of our results for sexual conflict in various species of insects, but focus primarily on dipteran flies of the family Sepsidae.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982746     DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  14 in total

Review 1.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Males optimally balance selfish and kin-selected strategies of sexual competition in the guppy.

Authors:  Mitchel J Daniel; Robert J Williamson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sally Le Page; Irem Sepil; Ewan Flintham; Tommaso Pizzari; Pau Carazo; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Kin selection promotes female productivity and cooperation between the sexes.

Authors:  Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Gonçalo S Faria; Susana A M Varela; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Cedric K W Tan; Felicity Allen; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Jennifer C Perry; Fern Johnson; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Sex-specific responses to sexual familiarity, and the role of olfaction in Drosophila.

Authors:  Cedric K W Tan; Hanne Løvlie; Elisabeth Greenway; Stephen F Goodwin; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Cedric Kai Wei Tan; Philippa Doyle; Emma Bagshaw; David S Richardson; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.