Literature DB >> 21982697

Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.

Scott A K Oberg1, Gregory J Christie, Matthew S Tata.   

Abstract

Problem gambling (PG) is increasingly conceptualized as an addiction akin to substance abuse, rather than an impulse control disorder, however the mechanism of addiction remains unclear. Neuroimaging investigations have supported a "reward deficiency" hypothesis for PG by suggesting a blunted response to gambling, particularly in the striatum. Here we describe electrophysiological evidence of a hypersensitive response to gambling feedback in problem gamblers. Previous research in healthy participants has shown that feedback during gambling tasks triggers stereotypical neural responses including the Feedback-Related Mediofrontal Negativity (FRN), the feedback-related P300, and an increase in induced theta-band (4-8 Hz) power. We tested the theory that abnormal feedback processing characterizes brain activity in problem gamblers while gambling. EEG was recorded from non-gamblers and self-identified gamblers as they engaged in a computerized version of the Iowa Gambling Task. Feedback about valence (win vs. loss) triggered a FRN in both groups, but in gamblers this was preceded by an early-latency hypersensitive fronto-central difference to feedback. This early FRN was correlated with gambling severity and was localized to medial frontal cortex using distributed source imaging (CLARA). Gamblers also differed in responses to risk, showing a blunted P300 component and less EEG power in the theta band. Here we suggest that a more nuanced interpretation of reward deficiency is called for with respect to PG. For certain aspects of brain function, gamblers may exhibit hypersensitivity to reward feedback more akin to drug sensitization than reward deficiency. Our results also suggest that the neurologically normal brain employs dissociable systems in the processing of feedback from tasks involving risky decision making. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982697     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  26 in total

1.  The importance of agency in human reward processing.

Authors:  Cameron D Hassall; Greg Hajcak; Olave E Krigolson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Brain oscillatory activity of skill and chance gamblers during a slot machine game.

Authors:  Helena Alicart; Ernest Mas-Herrero; Xavier Rifà-Ros; David Cucurell; Josep Marco-Pallarés
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  A KCNJ6 gene polymorphism modulates theta oscillations during reward processing.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Howard J Edenberg; Leah Wetherill; Marc Schuckit; Jen-Chyong Wang; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Jay A Tischfield; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  The roles of valuation and reward processing in cognitive function and psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Sébastien Hélie; Farzin Shamloo; Keisha Novak; Dan Foti
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Is Empathy Associated with Gambling and Its Addiction? A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies.

Authors:  Anise M S Wu; Hui Zhou; Le Dang; Juliet Honglei Chen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 6.  Chronotype and Mental Health: Recent Advances.

Authors:  Briana J Taylor; Brant P Hasler
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  A developmental study of the feedback-related negativity from 10-17 years: age and sex effects for reward versus non-reward.

Authors:  Michael J Crowley; Jia Wu; Rebecca E Hommer; Mikle South; Peter J Molfese; R M P Fearon; Linda C Mayes
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 8.  The Subthalamic Nucleus, Limbic Function, and Impulse Control.

Authors:  P Justin Rossi; Aysegul Gunduz; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 7.444

9.  Amplified Striatal Responses to Near-Miss Outcomes in Pathological Gamblers.

Authors:  Guillaume Sescousse; Lieneke K Janssen; Mahur M Hashemi; Monique H M Timmer; Dirk E M Geurts; Niels P Ter Huurne; Luke Clark; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  The Brain's Reward Response Occurs Even Without Actual Reward!

Authors:  A Fielding; Y Fu; E A Franz
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.