Literature DB >> 21978111

Noise properties of grating-based x-ray phase contrast computed tomography.

Thomas Köhler1, Klaus Jürgen Engel, Ewald Roessl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the properties of tomographic grating-based phase contrast imaging with respect to its noise power spectrum and the energy dependence of the achievable contrast to noise ratio.
METHODS: Tomographic simulations of an object with 11 cm diameter constituted of materials of biological interest were conducted at different energies ranging from 25 to 85 keV by using a wave propagation approach. Using a Monte Carlo simulation of the x-ray attenuation within the object, it is verified that the simulated measurement deposits the same dose within the object at each energy.
RESULTS: The noise in reconstructed phase contrast computed tomography images shows a maximum at low spatial frequencies. The contrast to noise ratio reaches a maximum around 45 keV for the simulated object. The general dependence of the contrast to noise on the energy appears to be independent of the material. Compared with reconstructed absorption contrast images, the reconstructed phase contrast images show sometimes better, sometimes worse, and sometimes similar contrast to noise, depending on the material and the energy.
CONCLUSIONS: Phase contrast images provide additional information to the conventional absorption contrast images and might thus be useful for medical applications. However, the observed noise power spectrum in reconstructed phase contrast images implies that the usual trade-off between noise and resolution is less efficient for phase contrast imaging compared with absorption contrast imaging. Therefore, high-resolution imaging is a strength of phase contrast imaging, but low-resolution imaging is not. This might hamper the clinical application of the method, in cases where a low spatial resolution is sufficient for diagnosis.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21978111     DOI: 10.1118/1.3532396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach.

Authors:  Erik Fredenberg; Mats Danielsson; J Webster Stayman; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Magnus Aslund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Fundamental relationship between the noise properties of grating-based differential phase contrast CT and absorption CT: theoretical framework using a cascaded system model and experimental validation.

Authors:  Ke Li; Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of bowtie filter and object position on the two-dimensional noise power spectrum of a clinical MDCT system.

Authors:  Daniel Gomez-Cardona; Juan Pablo Cruz-Bastida; Ke Li; Adam Budde; Jiang Hsieh; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Improving radiation dose efficiency of X-ray differential phase contrast imaging using an energy-resolving grating interferometer and a novel rank constraint.

Authors:  Yongshuai Ge; Ran Zhang; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Dual Energy Differential Phase Contrast CT (DE-DPC-CT) Imaging.

Authors:  Xu Ji; Ran Zhang; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Studies of signal estimation bias in grating-based x-ray multicontrast imaging.

Authors:  Xu Ji; Yongshuai Ge; Ran Zhang; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Spatial resolution characterization of differential phase contrast CT systems via modulation transfer function (MTF) measurements.

Authors:  Ke Li; Joseph Zambelli; Nicholas Bevins; Yongshuai Ge; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).

Authors:  Xiangyang Tang; Yi Yang; Shaojie Tang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Investigation of discrete imaging models and iterative image reconstruction in differential X-ray phase-contrast tomography.

Authors:  Qiaofeng Xu; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan; Marco Stampanoni; Peter Modregger; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  X-ray phase-contrast CT of a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma mouse model.

Authors:  Arne Tapfer; Rickmer Braren; Martin Bech; Marian Willner; Irene Zanette; Timm Weitkamp; Marija Trajkovic-Arsic; Jens T Siveke; Marcus Settles; Michaela Aichler; Axel Walch; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.