Literature DB >> 21977152

Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu1, Mircea Cinteza, Dragos Vinereanu.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID： 21977152      PMCID： PMC3177543     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)        ISSN： 1841-9038


× No keyword cloud information.
  51 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review.

Authors:  C C de Cock; M C Giudici; J W Twisk
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Native QRS complex duration predicts paced QRS width in patients with normal left ventricular function and right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Róbert Pap; Péter Fürge; Gábor Bencsik; Attila Makai; László Sághy; Tamás Forster
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 1.438

3.  Comparative left ventricular function following atrial, septal, and apical single chamber heart pacing in the young.

Authors:  P P Karpawich; S Mital
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results.

Authors:  Frederic Victor; Philippe Mabo; Hassan Mansour; Dominique Pavin; Guillaume Kabalu; Christian de Place; Christophe Leclercq; J Claude Daubert
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03

5.  Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacing: effect of underlying heart disease.

Authors:  J A Vassallo; D M Cassidy; J M Miller; A E Buxton; F E Marchlinski; M E Josephson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: practical and beneficial. A 9-year experience of 460 consecutive implants.

Authors:  Stephen C Vlay
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II.

Authors:  Jonathan S Steinberg; Avi Fischer; Paul Wang; Claudio Schuger; James Daubert; Scott McNitt; Mark Andrews; Mary Brown; W Jackson Hall; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04

8.  Heart failure hospitalization is more common in pacemaker patients with sinus node dysfunction and a prolonged paced QRS duration.

Authors:  Himanshu H Shukla; Anne S Hellkamp; Erskine A James; Greg C Flaker; Kerry L Lee; Michael O Sweeney; Gervasio A Lamas
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing.

Authors:  J C Nielsen; H R Andersen; P E Thomsen; L Thuesen; P T Mortensen; T Vesterlund; A K Pedersen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-03-17       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Right ventricular apical pacing acutely impairs left ventricular function and induces mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic study.

Authors:  Wen-Hao Liu; Mien-Cheng Chen; Yung-Lung Chen; Bih-Fang Guo; Kuo-Li Pan; Cheng-Hsu Yang; Hsueh-Wen Chang
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.251
View more
  1 in total

1.  Left ventricular strain analysis reveals better synchrony and diastolic function for septal versus apical right ventricular permanent pacing.

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas; Andrei Dumitru Margulescu; Calin Siliste; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.