Literature DB >> 9529267

Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing.

J C Nielsen1, H R Andersen, P E Thomsen, L Thuesen, P T Mortensen, T Vesterlund, A K Pedersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with sick sinus syndrome, choice of pacing mode has been implicated in the development of congestive heart failure. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 225 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome and intact atrioventricular conduction were randomized to either single-chamber atrial pacing (n = 110) or single-chamber ventricular pacing (n = 115). Clinical assessment included New York Heart Association classification, medication, and M-mode echocardiography before pacemaker implantation, after 3 months, and subsequently once every year. At long-term follow-up (mean, 5.5+/-2.4 years), NYHA class was higher in the ventricular group than in the atrial group (NYHA class I/II/III/IV: 65/44/4/0 versus 84/22/2/1 patients, P=.010). Increase in NYHA class during follow-up was observed in 35 of 113 patients in the ventricular group versus 10 of 109 in the atrial group (P<.0005). Increase in dose of diuretics from randomization to last follow-up was significantly higher in the ventricular group than in the atrial group (21+/-49 versus 8+/-42 mg furosemide/d, P=.033). The left ventricular fractional shortening decreased significantly in the ventricular group (from 0.36+/-0.12 to 0.31+/-0.08, P<.0005) but not in the atrial group (from 0.35+/-0.13 to 0.33+/-0.09, P=.087). The left atrial diameter increased significantly in both treatment groups (ventricular group: from 34+/-7 to 41+/-7 mm, P<.0005; atrial group: from 34+/-6 to 37+/-7 mm, P=.002), but the increase was significantly higher in the ventricular group than in the atrial group (P<.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: During long-term follow-up, ventricular pacing is associated with a higher incidence of congestive heart failure and consumption of diuretics than atrial pacing. This is accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular fractional shortening and an increased dilatation of the left atrium in the ventricular paced patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9529267     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.10.987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

Review 1.  Developing clinical indication for multisite pacing.

Authors:  L Kappenberger; X Lyon; N Cox; G Girod; J Schlaepfer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-07

3.  Incidence and predictors of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy with comparison between apical and non-apical right ventricular pacing sites.

Authors:  Raghav Bansal; Neeraj Parakh; Anunay Gupta; Rajnish Juneja; Nitish Naik; Rakesh Yadav; Gautam Sharma; Ambuj Roy; Sunil Kumar Verma; Vinay Kumar Bahl
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves left ventricular remodeling and function compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Dasheng Lu; Hao Zhang; Hongxiang Zhang
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Arterial thromboembolism in patients with sick sinus syndrome: prediction from pacing mode, atrial fibrillation, and echocardiographic findings.

Authors:  H R Andersen; J C Nielsen; P E Thomsen; L Thuesen; A K Pedersen; P T Mortensen; T Vesterlund
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Comparison of the Influence of Right Atrial Septal Pacing and Appendage Pacing on an Atrial Function and Atrial Fibrillation in the Clinical Situation.

Authors:  Mariko Tanaka; Su Kanae; Maki Maki-Oi; Yasuyo Motohashi; Kousuke Takahashi; Ko Euihong; Koji Hanazawa; Mamoru Toyofuku; Masahiko Kitada; Yousuke Yuzuki; Takashi Tamura
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Left ventricular strain analysis reveals better synchrony and diastolic function for septal versus apical right ventricular permanent pacing.

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas; Andrei Dumitru Margulescu; Calin Siliste; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-09

8.  Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  L Kristensen; J C Nielsen; P T Mortensen; O L Pedersen; A K Pedersen; H R Andersen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Potential prevention of pacing-induced heart failure using simple pacemaker programming algorithm.

Authors:  Tomasz Chwyczko; Rafał Dąbrowski; Aleksander Maciąg; Maciej Sterliński; Edyta Smolis-Bąk; Anna Borowiec; Ilona Kowalik; Andrada Łabęcka; Agnieszka Jankowska; Marek Kośmicki; Jadwiga Janas; Mariusz Pytkowski; Hanna Szwed
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  Efficacy of optimal medical therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade in patients with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Marius Schwerg; Henryk Dreger; Wolfram C Poller; Benjamin Dust; Christoph Melzer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.