Literature DB >> 12842643

Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review.

C C de Cock1, M C Giudici, J W Twisk.   

Abstract

The right ventricular apex has been used for cardiac stimulation because this position is easily accessible and is associated with a stable position of the electrode with a low dislodgement rate. This position, however, is associated with a dyssynchronous left ventricular contraction with subsequent deleterious haemodynamic effects. Alternative stimulation sites have been studied extensively because of a potentially better haemodynamic effect compared with right ventricular apex pacing. Using a Cochrane search strategy, nine studies were selected to analyze the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing. The results of these studies (n=217) were pooled and indicated a significantly better haemodynamic effect (odds ratio 0.34, confidence interval 0.15-0.53) compared with right ventricular apex pacing. Therefore, these data suggest that right ventricular outflow-tract pacing may offer a modest but significant benefit over right ventricular apex pacing in patients selected for pacemaker implantation on the basis of symptomatic bradyarrhythmias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12842643     DOI: 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00031-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  37 in total

1.  Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  Strategic choices to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related morbidity.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Comparison of the acute hemodynamic effect of right ventricular apex, outflow tract, and dual-site right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Andrzej Rubaj; Piotr Rucinski; Tomasz Sodolski; Andrzej Bilan; Marcin Gulaj; Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: not ready for prime-time.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Future easy and physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-26

Review 6.  New concepts in physiologic cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Dwight W Reynolds; Christina M Murray
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

8.  Chronic left ventricular pacing preserves left ventricular function in children.

Authors:  Irene E van Geldorp; Ward Y Vanagt; Urs Bauersfeld; Maren Tomaske; Frits W Prinzen; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Fifty years of cardiac pacing: the dark side of the moon?

Authors:  C C de Cock
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  Controversies in pacing: indications and programming.

Authors:  Anne M Gillis; Rik Willems
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.