Literature DB >> 21976154

Need and potential value of the Pig-ain vivo mutation assay-a HESI perspective.

Maik Schuler1, B Bhaskar Gollapudi, Véronique Thybaud, James H Kim.   

Abstract

The Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI), a global branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), initiated a project committee entitled "Relevance and Follow-up of Positive Results from In Vitro Genetic Toxicity Testing (IVGT)" with the overall objective of improving the scientific basis for the interpretation of results from genetic toxicology testing. The IVGT committee has also recognized the need to develop follow-up strategies for determining the relevance of in vitro test results to human health, and moving genetic toxicology testing from the sole purpose of hazard identification toward a more quantitative risk assessment approach. In this context, a group of experts evaluated the potential utility of the emerging in vivo mutational assessment model commonly known as the Pig-a gene mutation assay to follow-up positive in vitro genetic toxicology findings and to generate robust dose-response data for quantitative assessment of the in vivo mutagenicity. The IVGT experts participating in this effort represented academia, industry, and government agencies from across the globe and addressed such issues as the optimal sample size and experimental design for generating robust dose-response data. This expert group concluded that the emerging Pig-a gene mutation assay holds great promise as an in vivo mutagenicity assay, either as a stand-alone study or integrated into repeat-dose toxicology studies, and therefore supports further validation of the model.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21976154     DOI: 10.1002/em.20687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of male versus female responses in the Pig-a mutation assay.

Authors:  Carson Labash; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Kristine Carlson; Dorothea K Torous; Ariel Berg; Jeffrey C Bemis; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Integration of Pig-a, micronucleus, chromosome aberration and comet assay endpoints in a 28-day rodent toxicity study with urethane.

Authors:  Leon F Stankowski; Marilyn J Aardema; Timothy E Lawlor; Kamala Pant; Shambhu Roy; Yong Xu; Reem Elbekai
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Pig-a gene mutation assay study design: critical assessment of 3- versus 28-day repeat-dose treatment schedules.

Authors:  Azeddine Elhajouji; Tamsanqa Tafara Hove; Oliver O'Connell; Hansjoerg Martus; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  In vivo pig-a and micronucleus study of the prototypical aneugen vinblastine sulfate.

Authors:  Svetlana L Avlasevich; Carson Labash; Dorothea K Torous; Jeffrey C Bemis; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Human erythrocyte PIG-A assay: an easily monitored index of gene mutation requiring low volume blood samples.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Yuhchyau Chen; James T MacGregor
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored protein deficiency serves as a reliable reporter of Pig-a gene Mutation: Support from an in vitro assay based on L5178Y/Tk+/- cells and the CD90.2 antigen.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Carson Labash; Page McKinzie; Javier Revollo; Vasily N Dobrovolsky; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Sensitivity of the Pig-a assay for detecting gene mutation in rats exposed acutely to strong clastogens.

Authors:  Javed A Bhalli; Joseph G Shaddock; Mason G Pearce; Vasily N Dobrovolsky
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) and Pig-a mutation assay in vivo-tools for genotoxicity testing from a regulatory perspective: a study of benzo[a]pyrene in Ogg1(-/-) mice.

Authors:  Anne Graupner; Christine Instanes; Stephen D Dertinger; Jill Mari Andersen; Birgitte Lindeman; Tonje Danielsen Rongved; Gunnar Brunborg; Ann-Karin Olsen
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 9.  Recommendations for conducting the rodent erythrocyte Pig-a assay: A report from the HESI GTTC Pig-a Workgroup.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Javed A Bhalli; Daniel J Roberts; Leon F Stankowski; B Bhaskar Gollapudi; David P Lovell; Leslie Recio; Takafumi Kimoto; Daishiro Miura; Robert H Heflich
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Testing of acetaminophen in support of the international multilaboratory in vivo rat Pig-a assay validation trial.

Authors:  Bas-Jan van der Leede; Sandy Weiner; Terry Van Doninck; Kathleen De Vlieger; Ann Schuermans; Fetene Tekle; Helena Geys; Marjolein van Heerden; Sandra De Jonghe; Jacky Van Gompel
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.216

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.