Literature DB >> 21975712

Assessing colonoscopy training outcomes using quality indicators.

Leigh D Eckert, Matthew W Short, Jason E Domagalski, Khalid A Jaboori, Patricia A Short.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Training numbers for colonoscopy vary among specialties. Tracking colonoscopy quality indicators for program graduates may provide reliable outcome data to improve educational programs and establish training requirements. The purpose of this study was to measure specific colonoscopy quality indicators for a family medicine graduate to determine if outcome can be used to assess the quality of procedure training and contribute to more objective means of establishing training numbers.
METHODS: We present a case series of the first 800 colonoscopies performed by a newly credentialed family physician who had performed 101 procedures during residency training. Procedure reports and medical records were reviewed for all patients receiving a colonoscopy by this physician from September 2003 to September 2007. Selected quality indicators were compared to recommended colonoscopy standards.
RESULTS: The overall reach-the-cecum rate was 98.6%. Adenomas were detected in 21.6% of females and 33.7% of males. All polyps measuring less than 2 cm were removed. Epinephrine was used for 3 patients with hemostasis after polypectomy. There were no perforations.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality indicators for colonoscopy were met after 101 supervised procedures. Postgraduate tracking of nationally recognized colonoscopy quality indicators can provide valuable outcome data to improve residency training and assist in establishing uniform training requirements among specialties.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21975712      PMCID: PMC2931191          DOI: 10.4300/01.01.0014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  14 in total

1.  Training the gastroenterologist of the future: the Gastroenterology Core Curriculum.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Measuring the quality of endoscopy.

Authors:  David J Bjorkman; John W Popp
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates.

Authors:  G Dafnis; F Granath; L Påhlman; H Hannuksela; A Ekbom; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Objective evaluation of endoscopy skills during training.

Authors:  O W Cass; M L Freeman; C J Peine; R T Zera; G R Onstad
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.

Authors:  J B Marshall
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong-Min Ko; Young Hwangbo; Won Ho Kim; Dong Hun Park; Sang Kil Lee; Cheol Hee Park; Il-Hyun Baek; Dong Il Park; Seun-Ja Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Ik Jang; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Jeong Eun Shin; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chang-Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital.

Authors:  Florence Aslinia; Lance Uradomo; Allison Steele; Bruce D Greenwald; Jean-Pierre Raufman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Screening colonoscopies by primary care physicians: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Bruce LeClair; Mark Smolkin; Kathy Davies; Andria Thomas; Marcia L Taylor; Scott Strayer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  2 in total

1.  Water exchange method for colonoscopy: learning curve of an experienced colonoscopist in a U.S. community practice setting.

Authors:  Leonard S Fischer; Antoinette Lumsden; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

2.  Prospective Study of the Quality of Colonoscopies Performed by Primary Care Physicians: The Alberta Primary Care Endoscopy (APC-Endo) Study.

Authors:  Michael R Kolber; Clarence K W Wong; Richard N Fedorak; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.