Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Measuring the quality of endoscopy.

Literature DB >> 16564905

Measuring the quality of endoscopy.

David J Bjorkman¹, John W Popp.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2006 PMID： 16564905 DOI： 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.022

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastrointest Endosc ISSN： 0016-5107 Impact factor: 9.427

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

20 in total

1. Quality measurements in endoscopy.

Authors: David J Bjorkman
Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) Date: 2008-11

2. Assessing colonoscopy training outcomes using quality indicators.

Authors: Leigh D Eckert; Matthew W Short; Jason E Domagalski; Khalid A Jaboori; Patricia A Short
Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2009-09

3. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: Relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population.

Authors: Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Thibaud Koessler; Jeanin E van Hooft; Paul Fockens
Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 5.742

4. Improving Endoscopic Adherence to Quality Metrics in Colonoscopy.

Authors: Jonathan J Lu; Christopher H Decker; Sean E Connolly
Journal: Ochsner J Date: 2015

Review 5. Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic privileges: an overview.

Authors: D Armstrong; R Enns; T Ponich; J Romagnuolo; J Springer; A N Barkun
Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.522

6. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.

Authors: Rajesh N Keswani; Rena Yadlapati; Kristine M Gleason; Jody D Ciolino; Michael Manka; Kevin J O'Leary; Cynthia Barnard; John E Pandolfino
Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 10.864

Measuring the quality of endoscopy.

1. Quality measurements in endoscopy.

2. Assessing colonoscopy training outcomes using quality indicators.

3. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration: Relatively low sensitivity in the endosonographer population.

4. Improving Endoscopic Adherence to Quality Metrics in Colonoscopy.

Review 5. Canadian credentialing guidelines for endoscopic privileges: an overview.

6. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.

7. Defining and measuring quality in endoscopy.

8. Endoscopic training in gastroenterology fellowship: adherence to core curriculum guidelines.

Review 9. How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.

10. Quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy: the preface.