Literature DB >> 21974612

Comparison between pulsed laser and frequency-domain photoacoustic modalities: signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, resolution, and maximum depth detectivity.

Bahman Lashkari1, Andreas Mandelis.   

Abstract

In this work, a detailed theoretical and experimental comparison between various key parameters of the pulsed and frequency-domain (FD) photoacoustic (PA) imaging modalities is developed. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of these methods are theoretically calculated in terms of transducer bandwidth, PA signal generation physics, and laser pulse or chirp parameters. Large differences between maximum (peak) SNRs were predicted. However, it is shown that in practice the SNR differences are much smaller. Typical experimental SNRs were 23.2 dB and 26.1 dB for FD-PA and time-domain (TD)-PA peak responses, respectively, from a subsurface black absorber. The SNR of the pulsed PA can be significantly improved with proper high-pass filtering of the signal, which minimizes but does not eliminate baseline oscillations. On the other hand, the SNR of the FD method can be enhanced substantially by increasing laser power and decreasing chirp duration (exposure) correspondingly, so as to remain within the maximum permissible exposure guidelines. The SNR crossover chirp duration is calculated as a function of transducer bandwidth and the conditions yielding higher SNR for the FD mode are established. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the FD axial resolution is affected by both signal amplitude and limited chirp bandwidth. The axial resolution of the pulse is, in principle, superior due to its larger bandwidth; however, the bipolar shape of the signal is a drawback in this regard. Along with the absence of baseline oscillation in cross-correlation FD-PA, the FD phase signal can be combined with the amplitude signal to yield better axial resolution than pulsed PA, and without artifacts. The contrast of both methods is compared both in depth-wise (delay-time) and fixed delay time images. It was shown that the FD method possesses higher contrast, even after contrast enhancement of the pulsed response through filtering.
© 2011 American Institute of Physics

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21974612     DOI: 10.1063/1.3632117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum        ISSN: 0034-6748            Impact factor:   1.523


  14 in total

1.  Performance characterization of low-cost, high-speed, portable pulsed laser diode photoacoustic tomography (PLD-PAT) system.

Authors:  Paul Kumar Upputuri; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Biologically relevant photoacoustic imaging phantoms with tunable optical and acoustic properties.

Authors:  William C Vogt; Congxian Jia; Keith A Wear; Brian S Garra; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Photoacoustic tomography: principles and advances.

Authors:  Jun Xia; Junjie Yao; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Electromagn Waves (Camb)       Date:  2014

4.  The application of backscattered ultrasound and photoacoustic signals for assessment of bone collagen and mineral contents.

Authors:  Bahman Lashkari; Lifeng Yang; Andreas Mandelis
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-02

5.  Photoacoustic radar phase-filtered spatial resolution and co-registered ultrasound image enhancement for tumor detection.

Authors:  Edem Dovlo; Bahman Lashkari; Andreas Mandelis; Wei Shi; Fei-Fei Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Wavelength-modulated differential photoacoustic radar imager (WM-DPARI): accurate monitoring of absolute hemoglobin oxygen saturation.

Authors:  Sung Soo Sean Choi; Bahman Lashkari; Edem Dovlo; Andreas Mandelis
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Thermally enhanced signal strength and SNR improvement of photoacoustic radar module.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Andreas Mandelis
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 8.  Photoacoustic imaging with low-cost sources; A review.

Authors:  Mohsen Erfanzadeh; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-02-19

9.  Waveform engineering analysis of photoacoustic radar chirp parameters for spatial resolution and SNR optimization.

Authors:  Zuwen Sun; Natalie Baddour; Andreas Mandelis
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-05-02

10.  Interference-free Detection of Lipid-laden Atherosclerotic Plaques by 3D Co-registration of Frequency-Domain Differential Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Radar Imaging.

Authors:  Sung Soo Sean Choi; Bahman Lashkari; Andreas Mandelis; Jill J Weyers; Aaron Boyes; Stuart F Foster; Natasha Alves-Kotzev; Brian Courtney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.