Literature DB >> 10811171

Auditory spatial attention using interaural time differences.

A J Sach1, N I Hill, P J Bailey.   

Abstract

Previous probe-signal studies of auditory spatial attention have shown faster responses to sounds at an expected versus an unexpected location, making no distinction between the use of interaural time difference (ITD) cues and interaural-level difference cues. In 5 experiments, performance on a same-different spatial discrimination task was used in place of the reaction time metric, and sounds, presented over headphones, were lateralized only by an ITD. In all experiments, performance was better for signals lateralized on the expected side of the head, supporting the conclusion that ITDs can be used as a basis for covert orienting. The performance advantage generalized to all sounds within the spatial focus and was not dissipated by a trial-by-trial rove in frequency or by a rove in spectral profile. Successful use by the listeners of a cross-modal, centrally positioned visual cue provided evidence for top-down attentional control.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10811171     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  12 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptive coding is constrained to midline locations in a spatial listening task.

Authors:  J K Maier; P Hehrmann; N S Harper; G M Klump; D Pressnitzer; D McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Speech localization in a multitalker mixture.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Virginia Best; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Context effects in the discriminability of spatial cues.

Authors:  Julia Kerstin Maier; David McAlpine; Georg M Klump; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

6.  Adaptation to stimulus statistics in the perception and neural representation of auditory space.

Authors:  Johannes C Dahmen; Peter Keating; Fernando R Nodal; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The effect of exogenous spatial attention on auditory information processing.

Authors:  Kenichi Kanai; Kazuo Ikeda; Tadayuki Tayama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-11-15

Review 9.  Neural circuits underlying adaptation and learning in the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Johannes C Dahmen; Peter Keating; Nicholas D Leach; Fernando R Nodal; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  A Collection of Pseudo-Words to Study Multi-Talker Speech Intelligibility without Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.