PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to examine the effects of mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire stent in patients with thromboembolic occlusions of the intracranial carotid artery bifurcation (carotid T) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) and to compare the results with a historical cohort treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis using urokinase. METHODS: The time intervals from stroke onset to treatment, recanalization rates, occlusion sites, recanalization times and functional outcomes on the modified Rankin scale at 3 months in 25 patients treated with the Solitaire stent between 2010 and 2011 were evaluated. The data were compared with those of a historical cohort of 62 patients treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis between 1992 and 2001. RESULTS: A total of 15 out of 25 (60%) patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy and 25 out of 62 (40%) treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis achieved a modified Rankin score of ≤2 (p = 0.07). Occlusion sites, intervals from stroke onset to treatment and rates of parenchymal hematomas, 3 out of 25 (12%) versus 8 out of 62 (13%), were similar in both cohorts while the recanalization rate was significantly higher, 22 out of 25 (88%) versus 33 of 62 (53%), in the mechanical thrombectomy group (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: The data show that mechanical thrombectomy is superior to local intraarterial thrombolysis with respect to the recanalization rate in patients with thrombeoembolic carotid T or MCA occlusions.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to examine the effects of mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire stent in patients with thromboembolic occlusions of the intracranial carotid artery bifurcation (carotid T) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) and to compare the results with a historical cohort treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis using urokinase. METHODS: The time intervals from stroke onset to treatment, recanalization rates, occlusion sites, recanalization times and functional outcomes on the modified Rankin scale at 3 months in 25 patients treated with the Solitaire stent between 2010 and 2011 were evaluated. The data were compared with those of a historical cohort of 62 patients treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis between 1992 and 2001. RESULTS: A total of 15 out of 25 (60%) patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy and 25 out of 62 (40%) treated with local intraarterial thrombolysis achieved a modified Rankin score of ≤2 (p = 0.07). Occlusion sites, intervals from stroke onset to treatment and rates of parenchymal hematomas, 3 out of 25 (12%) versus 8 out of 62 (13%), were similar in both cohorts while the recanalization rate was significantly higher, 22 out of 25 (88%) versus 33 of 62 (53%), in the mechanical thrombectomy group (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: The data show that mechanical thrombectomy is superior to local intraarterial thrombolysis with respect to the recanalization rate in patients with thrombeoembolic carotid T or MCA occlusions.
Authors: Panagiotis Papanagiotou; Christian Roth; Silke Walter; Stefanie Behnke; Maria Politi; Klaus Fassbender; Anton Haass; Wolfgang Reith Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Furlan; R Higashida; L Wechsler; M Gent; H Rowley; C Kase; M Pessin; A Ahuja; F Callahan; W M Clark; F Silver; F Rivera Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eric Sauvageau; Rodney M Samuelson; Elad I Levy; Alison M Jeziorski; Ricky A Mehta; L Nelson Hopkins Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Werner Hacke; Geoffrey Donnan; Cesare Fieschi; Markku Kaste; Rüdiger von Kummer; Joseph P Broderick; Thomas Brott; Michael Frankel; James C Grotta; E Clarke Haley; Thomas Kwiatkowski; Steven R Levine; Chris Lewandowski; Mei Lu; Patrick Lyden; John R Marler; Suresh Patel; Barbara C Tilley; Gregory Albers; Erich Bluhmki; Manfred Wilhelm; Scott Hamilton Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-03-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H Urbach; A Hartmann; C Pohl; H Omran; K Wilhelm; S Flacke; H H Schild; T Klockgether Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2002-06-29 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: M Möhlenbruch; S Stampfl; L Behrens; C Herweh; S Rohde; M Bendszus; C Hametner; S Nagel; P A Ringleb; M Pham Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jens Fiehler; Michael Söderman; Francis Turjman; Philip M White; Søren Jacob Bakke; Salvatore Mangiafico; Rüdiger von Kummer; Mario Muto; Christophe Cognard; Jan Gralla Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: J Klisch; V Sychra; C Strasilla; C A Taschner; M Reinhard; H Urbach; S Meckel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Brian P Walcott; Kevin M Boehm; Christopher J Stapleton; Brijesh P Mehta; Brian V Nahed; Christopher S Ogilvy Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: J Pfaff; C Herweh; M Pham; S Schieber; P A Ringleb; M Bendszus; M Möhlenbruch Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 3.825