Literature DB >> 19204205

Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial.

Judith Hugh1, John Hanson, Maggie Chon U Cheang, Torsten O Nielsen, Charles M Perou, Charles Dumontet, John Reed, Maryla Krajewska, Isabelle Treilleux, Matthieu Rupin, Emmanuelle Magherini, John Mackey, Miguel Martin, Charles Vogel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic and predictive significance of subtyping node-positive early breast cancer by immunohistochemistry in a clinical trial of a docetaxel-containing regimen.
METHODS: Pathologic data from a central laboratory were available for 1,350 patients (91%) from the BCIRG 001 trial of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) for operable node-positive breast cancer. Patients were classified by tumor characteristics as (1) triple negative (estrogen receptor [ER]-negative, progesterone receptor [PR]-negative, HER2/neu [HER2]-negative), (2) HER2 (HER2-positive, ER-negative, PR-negative), (3) luminal B (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and either HER2-positive and/or Ki67(high)), and (4) luminal A (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and not HER2-positive or Ki67(high)), and assessed for prognostic significance and response to adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Patients were subdivided into triple negative (14.5%), HER2 (8.5%), luminal B (61.1%), and luminal A (15.9%). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (P values with luminal B as referent) were 67% (P < .0001), 68% (P = .0008), 82% (referent luminal B), and 91% (P = .0027), respectively, with hazard ratios of 2.22, 2.12, and 0.46. Improved 3-year DFS with TAC was found in the luminal B group (P = .025) and a combined ER-positive/HER2-negative group treated with tamoxifen (P = .041), with a marginal trend in the triple negatives (P = .051) and HER2 (P = .068) subtypes. No DFS advantage was seen in the luminal A population.
CONCLUSION: A simple immunopanel can divide breast cancers into biologic subtypes with strong prognostic effects. TAC significantly complements endocrine therapy in patients with luminal B subtype and, in the absence of targeted therapy, is effective in the triple-negative population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204205      PMCID: PMC2667821          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  46 in total

1.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Genetic relation of lobular carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ, and associated invasive carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  H Buerger; R Simon; K L Schäfer; R Diallo; R Littmann; C Poremba; P J van Diest; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; W Böcker
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2000-06

3.  Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns.

Authors:  S Gruvberger; M Ringnér; Y Chen; S Panavally; L H Saal; M Fernö; C Peterson; P S Meltzer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routine practice: interlaboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems.

Authors:  A Rhodes; B Jasani; D M Barnes; L G Bobrow; K D Miller
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Chemistry and chemical biology of taxane anticancer agents.

Authors:  M L Miller; I Ojima
Journal:  Chem Rec       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.771

7.  Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study.

Authors:  Christos Sotiriou; Soek-Ying Neo; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn; Philip M Long; Amir Jazaeri; Philippe Martiat; Steve B Fox; Adrian L Harris; Edison T Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets.

Authors:  Therese Sorlie; Robert Tibshirani; Joel Parker; Trevor Hastie; J S Marron; Andrew Nobel; Shibing Deng; Hilde Johnsen; Robert Pesich; Stephanie Geisler; Janos Demeter; Charles M Perou; Per E Lønning; Patrick O Brown; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Molecular cytogenetic identification of subgroups of grade III invasive ductal breast carcinomas with different clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Chris Jones; Emily Ford; Cheryl Gillett; Ken Ryder; Samantha Merrett; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Laura G Fulford; Andrew Hanby; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  176 in total

1.  Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Marco Colleoni; Bernard F Cole; Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Karen N Price; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Diana Crivellari; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Barry A Gusterson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Breast cancer and fertility preservation.

Authors:  S Samuel Kim; Jennifer Klemp; Carol Fabian
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  How do I treat "triple-negative" disease.

Authors:  Christos Vaklavas; Andres Forero-Torres
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Participation of older patients with prostate cancer in Medicare eligible trials.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Scott M Gilbert; Jill Boylston Herndon; Bruce Vogel; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Molecular therapy of breast cancer: progress and future directions.

Authors:  Sheng-Xiang Lin; Jiong Chen; Mausumi Mazumdar; Donald Poirier; Cheng Wang; Arezki Azzi; Ming Zhou
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive or/and T3 or T4 breast cancer: clinical outcome (Mansoura University).

Authors:  H Sakr; R H Hamed; A H Anter; T Yossef
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer correlates with immunohistochemically defined subtypes.

Authors:  Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong Seon Park; Keon Wook Kang; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Won Hwa Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Mi Young Kim; Jin You Kim; Mirinae Seo; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Genomic profiling in luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Daniel Hofmann; Rachel Würstlein; Cornelia Liedtke; Ulrike Nitz; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Molecular Markers as Prognostic Factors in DCIS and Small Invasive Breast Cancers.

Authors:  N Sänger; K Engels; A Graf; E Ruckhäberle; K E Effenberger; T Fehm; U Holtrich; S Becker; T Karn
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.