Literature DB >> 16522583

Spending on postapproval drug safety.

David B Ridley1, Judith M Kramer, Hugh H Tilson, Henry G Grabowski, Kevin A Schulman.   

Abstract

Withdrawals of high-profile pharmaceuticals have focused attention on post-approval safety surveillance. There have been no systematic assessments of spending on postapproval safety. We surveyed drug manufacturers regarding safety efforts. Mean spending on postapproval safety per company in 2003 was 56 million dollars (0.3 percent of sales). Assuming a constant safety-to-sales ratio, we estimated that total spending on postapproval safety by the top twenty drug manufacturers was 800 million dollars in 2003. We also examined, using regression analysis, the relationship between the number of safety personnel and the number of initial adverse-event reports. This study offers information for the debate on proposed changes to safety surveillance.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16522583     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  2 in total

1.  Pharmacy student perceptions of adverse event reporting.

Authors:  Sirisha Kalari; Matthew Dormarunno; Oleg Zvenigorodsky; Aparna Mohan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  The role of Periodic Safety Update Reports in the safety management of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Hans C Ebbers; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Fakhredin A Sayed-Tabatabaei; Ellen H M Moors; Huub Schellekens; Hubert G M Leufkens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.