Ellen A Lipstein1,2,3, William B Brinkman2,4,3, Maria T Britto1,2,5,3. 1. Division of Adolescent Medicine (EAL, MTB) Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 2. Center for Innovation in Chronic Disease Care (EAL, WBB, MTB) Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 3. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH (EAL, WBB, MTB) 4. Division of General and Community Pediatrics (WBB) Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 5. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence (MTB) Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increasing complexity of decisions in pediatric medicine, there is a growing need to understand the pediatric decision-making process. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a narrative review of the current research on parent decision making about pediatric treatments and identify areas in need of further investigation. METHODS: Articles presenting original research on parent decision making were identified from MEDLINE (1966-6/2011), using the terms "decision making," "parent," and "child." We included papers focused on treatment decisions but excluded those focused on information disclosure to children, vaccination, and research participation decisions. RESULTS: We found 55 papers describing 52 distinct studies, the majority being descriptive, qualitative studies of the decision-making process, with very limited assessment of decision outcomes. Although parents' preferences for degree of participation in pediatric decision making vary, most are interested in sharing the decision with the provider. In addition to the provider, parents are influenced in their decision making by changes in their child's health status, other community members, prior knowledge, and personal factors, such as emotions and faith. Parents struggle to balance these influences as well as to know when to include their child in decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Current research demonstrates a diversity of influences on parent decision making and parent decision preferences; however, little is known about decision outcomes or interventions to improve outcomes. Further investigation, using prospective methods, is needed in order to understand how to support parents through the difficult treatment decisions.
BACKGROUND: With the increasing complexity of decisions in pediatric medicine, there is a growing need to understand the pediatric decision-making process. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a narrative review of the current research on parent decision making about pediatric treatments and identify areas in need of further investigation. METHODS: Articles presenting original research on parent decision making were identified from MEDLINE (1966-6/2011), using the terms "decision making," "parent," and "child." We included papers focused on treatment decisions but excluded those focused on information disclosure to children, vaccination, and research participation decisions. RESULTS: We found 55 papers describing 52 distinct studies, the majority being descriptive, qualitative studies of the decision-making process, with very limited assessment of decision outcomes. Although parents' preferences for degree of participation in pediatric decision making vary, most are interested in sharing the decision with the provider. In addition to the provider, parents are influenced in their decision making by changes in their child's health status, other community members, prior knowledge, and personal factors, such as emotions and faith. Parents struggle to balance these influences as well as to know when to include their child in decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Current research demonstrates a diversity of influences on parent decision making and parent decision preferences; however, little is known about decision outcomes or interventions to improve outcomes. Further investigation, using prospective methods, is needed in order to understand how to support parents through the difficult treatment decisions.
Authors: Michael H Hsieh; Ramiro J Madden-Fuentes; Aaron Bayne; Erika Munch; Patience Wildenfels; Sandra J Alexander; Edmond T Gonzales; Lars J Cisek; Eric A Jones; David R Roth Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Elizabeth K Vig; Helene Starks; Janelle S Taylor; Elizabeth K Hopley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tessie W October; Pamela S Hinds; Jichuan Wang; Zoelle B Dizon; Yao I Cheng; Debra L Roter Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Eden G Robertson; Claire E Wakefield; Joanne Shaw; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Brittany C McGill; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ellen A Lipstein; William B Brinkman; Alexander G Fiks; Kristin S Hendrix; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Victoria A Miller; Lisa A Prosser; Wendy J Ungar; David Fox Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Adrian D Zurca; Kiondra R Fisher; Remigio J Flor; Catalina D Gonzalez-Marques; Jichuan Wang; Yao I Cheng; Tessie W October Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2016-12-15
Authors: Leila C Sahni; Julie A Boom; Sarah S Mire; Leandra N Berry; Lauren R Dowell; Charles G Minard; Rachel M Cunningham; Robin P Goin-Kochel Journal: Child Health Care Date: 2020-03-17